Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Om Prakash Saini & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court directed revenue authorities to expeditiously decide petitioners' pending representation for correction of land records following liberty granted in an earlier writ petition.
Supertech Urban Home Buyers Association Foundation v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions by homebuyers against banks and builder, holding writ jurisdiction is not maintainable over private contractual disputes where alternative statutory remedies exist.
Dr. A.P. Singh v. Dr. Kamal Mitra Chenoy & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition challenging partial disallowance of recalling witnesses by consent, directing recording of defendant's evidence with strict compliance.
Simi Nanda v. Delhi Development Authority
Writ petitions challenging show cause notices under Section 4 of the Public Premises Act are not maintainable; occupants must file replies and be heard by the Estate Officer before eviction proceedings proceed.
Mamta v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a dowry harassment and attempt to murder case, holding that no custodial interrogation was necessary and there was no prima facie material to deny bail.
Raj Kumar v. The State, National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of dowry harassment and attempt to murder, holding that no prima facie case was made out against him and no material supported threat or evidence tampering.
Sanjeev Kumar and Anr v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the revocation of Section 308 IPC charge, holding that simple injuries without intention or knowledge to cause death do not attract that offence.
The India Government Mint v. Alfa Security and Allied Services
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award dismissing objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, holding that judicial interference is limited and the invocation of the performance bank guarantee without proof of loss was unjustified.
Sirona Hygiene Private Limited v. Amazon Seller Services Private Limited and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction against Defendant 7 for infringing the plaintiff's registered design of a disposable female urination device, affirming the plaintiff's prima facie entitlement despite pending registration of assignment rights.
Pooran and Ors. v. Sub-Divisional Magistrate/ Revenue Assistant, South West District and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal within one year of a 34-year delayed proceeding under Section 85 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, emphasizing that administrative delays cannot indefinitely infringe legal rights.
Noor Mohammad v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that post completion of land consolidation proceedings, transfer of land including by gift within family is permissible under Section 30 of the East Punjab Holdings Act and directed authorities to consider such applications expeditiously.
Deepak Mohan & Anr. v. State NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to recall the complainant for further cross-examination, holding that sufficient opportunities had been given and the accused's conduct justified closure of cross-examination rights.
Pankaj Jain v. Parul Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld interim visitation rights in a matrimonial dispute as prima facie, directing the Family Court to reconsider after trial and maintain status quo pending final disposal.
A S Rawat v. Dawa Tashi
The Delhi High Court held that the RTI Act's right to information extends to non-citizens depending on circumstances and upheld a penalty on the PIO for mala fide denial of information to a Tibetan national employee.
Shyam Gupta & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside charges against petitioner no. 3 under the NDPS Act, holding that call detail records without corroborative evidence or admissible disclosures do not constitute sufficient prima facie evidence for framing charges.
AC IMPEX v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed GST refunds under Section 56 of the CGST Act runs from 60 days after the original refund application, not from a subsequent court order, where no adjudicatory lis exists.
Swararaj @ Raj Shrikant Thackeray v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order under Sections 153A, 295A, and 298 IPC for procedural violations but refused to quash the criminal complaint, emphasizing mandatory inquiry under Section 202 CrPC and prior sanction under Section 196 CrPC.
Management of M/s Kailash Hospital and Research Centre v. Nisha
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Commissioner’s jurisdiction to entertain a compensation claim filed by the deceased employee’s dependent residing in Delhi, rejecting the appellant hospital’s challenge on jurisdiction and duty status grounds.
Biomoneta Research Pvt Ltd v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and directed grant of the patent for an air decontamination device, holding that the invention involves an inventive step beyond prior art and is not obvious.
Amit @ Rahul v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a serious firearm injury case under Section 307 IPC and Arms Act, emphasizing judicial discretion and imposing strict conditions to prevent interference with the investigation.