Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Yassh Deep Builders LLP v. Sushil Kumar Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking specific performance and interim relief over a terminated collaboration agreement, holding that determinable contracts are not specifically enforceable and interim protection under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act cannot restore terminated contracts.
Sunil Kumar Rai v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that engineers in BRO who have completed four years at Level 8 Grade Pay Rs.4,800 are entitled to Non Functional Upgradation to Level 9 Grade Pay Rs.5,400, directing uniform application of Seventh Pay Commission recommendations.
Manjit Kaur v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against a petitioner who was found with a single live cartridge in her bag but lacked conscious possession or knowledge of it.
Soumya Ghosh & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce decree, emphasizing the court's power to encourage voluntary resolution.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Ravinder Kaur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commissioner’s award of compensation for death during employment, holding that appeals under Section 30 of the Employees’ Compensation Act are limited to substantial questions of law and do not permit reappraisal of factual findings.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Babita & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal under Section 30 of the Employees’ Compensation Act, holding that the insurer is liable to pay compensation as the deceased held a valid driving licence and factual findings cannot be reappraised on appeal.
D. C. Murmu v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recovery of excess pension payments from a retired Class III/IV employee is impermissible under settled Supreme Court law and directed refund of the recovered amount with interest.
Bhargava Commercial Pvt. Ltd. v. Kunal Advertising Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of a complaint dismissed in default under Section 138 NI Act, holding that non-appearance due to pandemic-related confusion was accidental and not wilful.
Mohd Airaf alias Mohd. Airaf Sabri alias Shanu and Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage by Talaq.
Tarun Sharma v. Ali Zulfikar Ahmed & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's order allowing amendment of the plaint after trial commencement due to procedural deficiencies and granted liberty to file a proper amendment application.
M/S BAL PHARMA LIMITED v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER AND ADDITIONAL SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that procedural lapses like non-submission of ARE-2 do not automatically bar rebate claims under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules if substantive conditions are met, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Amit Sharma v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld the DDA's discretionary rejection of the highest bid in an e-auction, holding no contract arose without formal acceptance and refusing judicial interference in commercial evaluation absent arbitrariness.
Harveer Giri v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the petitioner in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that procedural discrepancies and delayed FSL reports do not entitle default bail absent satisfaction of statutory conditions.
Dolby International AB v. The Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court quashed a poorly reasoned patent rejection order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with a proper hearing.
Sanjay Malik @ Sant Sevak Das v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a sexual assault case, emphasizing nuanced assessment of consent and the risk of witness interference.
Mohit @ Mohit Attri and Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled and obtained a mutual consent divorce.
Shiv and Sons v. Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld IRCTC's decision to enforce distinct tender conditions without relaxation of licence fees for post-COVID contracts, ruling that bidders cannot challenge tender terms after participating with full knowledge and that such differentiation does not violate Article 14.
Vijaykant Jagannath Kulkarni v. Disciplinary Committee The ICAI and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the ICAI disciplinary order, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Manju Rani & Ors. v. Boxing Federation of India and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the selection process for the Women’s World Boxing Championship 2023, refusing interim relief to petitioners challenging their non-selection, holding that the process was fair, reasonable, and non-arbitrary.
Ankur Kohli v. Vinita Kohli
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to restore and amend a dismissed divorce petition to one under Section 13B for mutual consent divorce based on a settlement, directing the Family Court to waive the statutory waiting period.