Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
Bhargava Commercial Pvt. Ltd. v. Kunal Advertising Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of a complaint dismissed in default under Section 138 NI Act, holding that non-appearance due to pandemic-related confusion was accidental and not wilful.
Mohd Airaf alias Mohd. Airaf Sabri alias Shanu and Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage by Talaq.
Tarun Sharma v. Ali Zulfikar Ahmed & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's order allowing amendment of the plaint after trial commencement due to procedural deficiencies and granted liberty to file a proper amendment application.
M/S BAL PHARMA LIMITED v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER AND ADDITIONAL SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that procedural lapses like non-submission of ARE-2 do not automatically bar rebate claims under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules if substantive conditions are met, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Amit Sharma v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld the DDA's discretionary rejection of the highest bid in an e-auction, holding no contract arose without formal acceptance and refusing judicial interference in commercial evaluation absent arbitrariness.
Harveer Giri v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the petitioner in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that procedural discrepancies and delayed FSL reports do not entitle default bail absent satisfaction of statutory conditions.
Dolby International AB v. The Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court quashed a poorly reasoned patent rejection order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with a proper hearing.
Sanjay Malik @ Sant Sevak Das v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a sexual assault case, emphasizing nuanced assessment of consent and the risk of witness interference.
Mohit @ Mohit Attri and Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled and obtained a mutual consent divorce.
Shiv and Sons v. Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld IRCTC's decision to enforce distinct tender conditions without relaxation of licence fees for post-COVID contracts, ruling that bidders cannot challenge tender terms after participating with full knowledge and that such differentiation does not violate Article 14.
Vijaykant Jagannath Kulkarni v. Disciplinary Committee The ICAI and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the ICAI disciplinary order, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Manju Rani & Ors. v. Boxing Federation of India and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the selection process for the Women’s World Boxing Championship 2023, refusing interim relief to petitioners challenging their non-selection, holding that the process was fair, reasonable, and non-arbitrary.
Ankur Kohli v. Vinita Kohli
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to restore and amend a dismissed divorce petition to one under Section 13B for mutual consent divorce based on a settlement, directing the Family Court to waive the statutory waiting period.
Om Prakash Saini & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court directed revenue authorities to expeditiously decide petitioners' pending representation for correction of land records following liberty granted in an earlier writ petition.
Supertech Urban Home Buyers Association Foundation v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions by homebuyers against banks and builder, holding writ jurisdiction is not maintainable over private contractual disputes where alternative statutory remedies exist.
Dr. A.P. Singh v. Dr. Kamal Mitra Chenoy & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition challenging partial disallowance of recalling witnesses by consent, directing recording of defendant's evidence with strict compliance.
Simi Nanda v. Delhi Development Authority
Writ petitions challenging show cause notices under Section 4 of the Public Premises Act are not maintainable; occupants must file replies and be heard by the Estate Officer before eviction proceedings proceed.
Mamta v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a dowry harassment and attempt to murder case, holding that no custodial interrogation was necessary and there was no prima facie material to deny bail.
Raj Kumar v. The State, National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of dowry harassment and attempt to murder, holding that no prima facie case was made out against him and no material supported threat or evidence tampering.
Sanjeev Kumar and Anr v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the revocation of Section 308 IPC charge, holding that simple injuries without intention or knowledge to cause death do not attract that offence.