Delhi High Court
63,002 judgments
Riyazuddin v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that filing a charge-sheet within the statutory period for known offences bars the accused from claiming statutory bail even if further investigation leads to supplementary charge-sheets for additional offences.
Ramesh Kumar Singla and Anr. v. Satwant Kaur
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against a trial court's restraint order on suit property, holding that the appellants were given sufficient opportunity to be heard before the interim order was passed.
Gujarat State Export Corporation Ltd. v. Mukesh Tyagi
The Delhi High Court upheld the illegality of termination without compliance with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act but denied regularization, awarding monetary compensation in lieu of reinstatement.
Kulveer Singh and Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Rangoli International Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the demand for refund of duty drawback where export proceeds were not realised within the prescribed time, rejecting the petitioner’s claim of exemption under RBI Circular and Drawback Rules.
Chander Bhan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness and ballistic evidence linking the appellant's licensed firearm to the fatal shooting.
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Bimlesh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying the Pranay Sethi principles retrospectively, recognizing the deceased as skilled labour, and adjusting future prospects and deductions accordingly.
Smt. Ganga Devi v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of the court process.
Ravi Handa & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Manjit Singh Kochhar v. Harjit Singh Kochhar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that leasing property without Court permission violates an interim restraining order and imposed costs on the defendant for such breach.
Anushka Sharma v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking re-evaluation of CBSE Class X mathematics answer sheet, holding that prescribed procedural timelines for verification and re-evaluation are mandatory and must be strictly followed.
Jyoti Singh v. Nand Kishore & Ors.
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a 14-year-old girl with 100% permanent disability from a motor accident, applying Kajal precedent and awarding comprehensive lifelong damages.
Munish Gautam v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that the petitioner had not served half the minimum sentence and factual disputes must be resolved at trial.
Desh Dinkar Jain v. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit alleging fraud involving bank officials is maintainable in civil court despite statutory bars conferring exclusive jurisdiction on Debt Recovery Tribunals, and dismissed the application to reject the plaint.
M/S SDREEN INDIA LTD v. SMT. MEENA CHAWLA
Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file belated Statement of Defence in arbitration proceedings, holding that limitation period starts from delivery of documents and extended time granted by Arbitral Tribunal must be respected.
Rangoli International Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the recovery of duty drawback from an exporter who failed to realise export proceeds within the prescribed time, rejecting claims based on RBI write-off circular and non-application of refund rules.
Mandal and Associates v. Hero Fincorp Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award, holding that the award was not patently illegal or against public policy and that courts must limit interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Khushi Ram v. Radha Kishan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging execution of a decree based on a settlement agreement partitioning property by metes and bounds, holding that such agreements are binding unless properly challenged and that belated objections to execution constitute abuse of process.
Ritu Rani and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation against the transfer order, stay the transfer pending decision, and decide the representation within two weeks.
Birendra Kumar Paswan & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to conduct a review Departmental Promotion Committee to revise the petitioners' seniority and grant consequential benefits, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.