Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
K Murugan v. Delhi Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Board & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that pension benefits cannot be denied to a construction worker based on Aadhaar card date of birth discrepancies when the Board's registration records show valid membership at retirement, directing release of pension.
Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld an injunction restraining HUL from publishing advertisements disparaging Reckitt's Harpic product and using its registered bottle shape without truthful factual basis.
M/S Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs v. Delhi Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a delayed appeal under the CGST Act, holding that limitation periods with capped condonation cannot be extended beyond statutory limits, and ignorance of notification is not sufficient cause.
Umang Sahai Aggarwal v. Jai Prakash and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking to set aside a 13-year-old ex-parte decree, holding that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause for prolonged non-appearance under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.
Ajay Mahajan v. Mridula Mukherjee & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the parties' joint application to record their amicable settlement regarding the estate dispute, decreed the suit and appeal accordingly, and ordered refund of court fees.
Indo Silicon Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Trade & Taxes
The Delhi High Court held that a selling dealer is entitled to rely on genuine C Forms issued by a registered purchasing dealer and that retrospective cancellation of such forms by outside authorities cannot deny tax benefits already availed.
Siddharth Bajaj v. Ravi Kumar Bajaj
The Delhi High Court's order directing conversion of jointly owned leasehold property to freehold and appointing a Local Commissioner was upheld, and writ petitions challenging these orders post-Supreme Court dismissal of SLPs were dismissed as not maintainable and an abuse of process.
Jagdish v. Delhi Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Board & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a construction worker is entitled to pension benefits despite renewal of membership beyond superannuation age due to Board's error, clarifying the interplay between Section 14 of the Act and Rule 272 of the Rules and emphasizing natural justice.
Isan Corporation v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld NHAI's one-year debarment of petitioners for deficiencies in consultancy services, emphasizing procedural fairness and relegating technical disputes to contractual resolution.
Shree Kirtee v. Commissioner of Police & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enforced a mutual consent divorce custody agreement by directing restoration of the minor child's custody to the mother and allowing the father to seek custody through proper legal channels.
TTK Prestige Ltd v. Arjun Ram & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted an interlocutory injunction restraining defendants from infringing the plaintiff's registered pressure cooker design and trade dress, finding prima facie design piracy and passing off.
M/S KAMLADITYYA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD v. RAIL LAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause permitting unilateral appointment of arbitrators by one party is invalid and appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act.
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council
The Delhi High Court corrected its earlier order to accurately record the petitioner's submission on the nature of contracts and held that the arbitrator shall independently decide whether the contracts are works contracts involving services without being influenced by the Court's observations.
Unic Healthcare & Ors. v. Pneumo Care Health Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi High Court held that filing a written statement by email directly to the court, acknowledged by the court and followed by filing hard copies within time, constitutes valid filing under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Dabur India Ltd v. The Registrar of Trade Marks Trade Marks Registry & Anr.
The Delhi High Court approved and enforced a settlement agreement resolving trademark disputes between Dabur India Ltd. and other parties concerning the use of the word 'SUPER', resulting in disposal of all connected proceedings.
KKH Finvest Private Limited & Anr. v. Sharad Arora & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a Memorandum of Settlement containing an arbitration clause, directing all related claims to arbitration and disposing of interim relief petitions accordingly.
M/S SPACE 4 BUSINESS SOLUTION PVT v. DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER NORTH WEST & ANR.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate a payment dispute arising from a tender agreement, following the parties' consent to arbitration.
RAMA CIVIL INDIA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD v. DELHI TRANSCO LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve contractual payment disputes where the respondent failed to appoint an arbitrator.
Vineet Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending leave application within 10 days, emphasizing timely administrative action.
Meeta Chakraborty and Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' claim for interest on delayed 7th CPC arrears, balancing employees' rights with the school's financial hardship and Court-directed compliance.