Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
Mamta v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a female accused in a murder case who had been in custody for eight months despite prior absconding, imposing conditions to ensure trial attendance and prevent interference.
Bijender Singh and Ors. v. The Director-General
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioners' representation seeking ACP/MACP benefits within eight weeks, ensuring timely administrative action without adjudicating entitlement.
Sumit Anand v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a minor punishment of 'Censure' expires in six months and does not bar eligibility for departmental promotion exams if followed by a clean service record.
DB CORP LTD v. WHATSAPP LLC & ORS.
The Delhi High Court decreed the suit for infringement of electronic newspaper rights against WhatsApp groups after partial compliance by WhatsApp and lack of evidence against some groups.
Lokesh Chugh v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a university order debarring a student from exams for lack of reasons and violation of natural justice, restoring his admission and directing fresh proceedings with due process.
Ankit v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to schedule witness examination reasonably and supply complete witness statements, emphasizing the need for a detailed case calendar to ensure a fair trial.
Ankit v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to transfer a criminal case, holding that the Sessions Judge's discretion was properly exercised and not liable to interference.
M/S Northern India Tiles Corporation v. Jindal Charitable Trust
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's application to recall an order denying cross-examination, emphasizing the necessity of hearing parties and considering medical grounds to uphold natural justice.
Sh. Ravinder Yadav v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction as no part of the cause of action arose within Delhi, reaffirming that Article 226 jurisdiction requires a cause of action within the court's territorial limits.
Mayank Suri & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled and obtained a mutual divorce decree.
BPI SPORTS LLC v. Saurabh Gulati & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking removal of an Indian trademark registration, holding that the foreign mark owner failed to establish sufficient trans-border reputation and goodwill in India to sustain a passing off claim or rectification under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act.
Tirupati Trading Corporation v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment proceedings against M/s Tirupati Trading Corporation for AY 2015-16 due to lack of credible material and misidentification of the assessee.
Dr Saravana Kodandapani and Dr Ladi Jeevan Sitaram v. The All India Ophthalmological Society
The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 does not extend to election disputes of a private society not performing State functions, dismissing the petition challenging AIOS election Bye-Laws and notifications.
Neha Aviation Management P Ltd v. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside tax assessment orders for breach of natural justice and directed a de novo assessment with an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Vikas Bhatnagar v. State Through SHO R.K. Puram Police Station
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute upon the parties' genuine settlement and mutual consent to withdraw the complaint.
Sita Ram v. Kuldeep Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's rejection of documents sought to be placed on record at the pre-trial stage for lack of relevance but allowed their use during trial.
Kulbir Singh & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A/406/34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following a genuine amicable settlement and the death of the complainant's husband.
Nirpender Kumar v. Director General CISF
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF to decide the petitioner's pending representation against his transfer within a stipulated time and stayed the transfer order until such decision.
Havna Bhartendu Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending leave application within ten days, emphasizing timely administrative action.
Union of India and Others v. Ex L/NK Bijender Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to an ex-serviceman suffering from stroke, affirming the presumption of sound health at entry and the employer's burden to disprove service attribution.