Delhi High Court
63,002 judgments
Manoj Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and reconciliation between the parties.
Kapil Nehra & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce decree, emphasizing the interest of justice in such cases.
Kalpna v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an order stopping Dearness Relief and recovery from pension without issuing a Show Cause Notice, directing the respondents to follow due procedure before taking final action.
Satish Kumar Kashyap alias Sagar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for aggravated penetrative sexual assault of a minor girl under the POCSO Act, affirming that partial penetration without semen emission suffices to constitute rape.
MEGA SELFLUBE BEARINGS PVT. LTD. v. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 17(1), DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside the impugned tax reassessment order and notice due to procedural irregularities including insufficient response time and incorrect e-mail communication, directing a fresh examination with adherence to natural justice.
Manoranjan Baishya v. Central Industrial Security Force
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging removal from service, holding that the complainant's signatures on the complaints were genuine as verified in Court.
Deepak Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a 5-year-old girl, affirming reliance on credible child testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence despite absence of semen.
Bhagwan Adarsh Polytechnic College v. All India Council for Teacher Education
Delhi High Court directed AICTE to process pending applications for approval of new technical institutions for 2023-24 academic session without delay, without quashing the challenged moratorium provisions.
R.S. Dagar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of ex parte departmental enquiry and compulsory retirement of a CISF officer for wilful absence despite medical claims, emphasizing proper service efforts and limited judicial interference in disciplinary punishments.
Mamta v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a female accused in a murder case who had been in custody for eight months despite prior absconding, imposing conditions to ensure trial attendance and prevent interference.
Bijender Singh and Ors. v. The Director-General
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioners' representation seeking ACP/MACP benefits within eight weeks, ensuring timely administrative action without adjudicating entitlement.
Sumit Anand v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a minor punishment of 'Censure' expires in six months and does not bar eligibility for departmental promotion exams if followed by a clean service record.
DB CORP LTD v. WHATSAPP LLC & ORS.
The Delhi High Court decreed the suit for infringement of electronic newspaper rights against WhatsApp groups after partial compliance by WhatsApp and lack of evidence against some groups.
Lokesh Chugh v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a university order debarring a student from exams for lack of reasons and violation of natural justice, restoring his admission and directing fresh proceedings with due process.
Ankit v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to schedule witness examination reasonably and supply complete witness statements, emphasizing the need for a detailed case calendar to ensure a fair trial.
Ankit v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to transfer a criminal case, holding that the Sessions Judge's discretion was properly exercised and not liable to interference.
M/S Northern India Tiles Corporation v. Jindal Charitable Trust
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's application to recall an order denying cross-examination, emphasizing the necessity of hearing parties and considering medical grounds to uphold natural justice.
Sh. Ravinder Yadav v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction as no part of the cause of action arose within Delhi, reaffirming that Article 226 jurisdiction requires a cause of action within the court's territorial limits.
Mayank Suri & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled and obtained a mutual divorce decree.
BPI SPORTS LLC v. Saurabh Gulati & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking removal of an Indian trademark registration, holding that the foreign mark owner failed to establish sufficient trans-border reputation and goodwill in India to sustain a passing off claim or rectification under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act.