Delhi High Court

63,571 judgments

Year:

M/S HARI CHAND SHRI GOPAL v. SHIB SAKTI GOPLA ZARDA FACTORY

15 May 2023 · Sanjeev Narula · 2023:DHC:4088

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to the Plaintiff against the Defendant for trademark infringement and passing off of the “GOPAL” mark and trade dress in tobacco products, rejecting the Defendant’s use of deceptively similar marks.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Trade dress Permanent injunction

Vivek Trivedi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

15 May 2023 · Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2023:DHC:3636-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner's case during the survey under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, and dismissed the writ petition without granting further relief.

administrative petition_dismissed Street Vendors Act 2014 Town Vending Committee Certificate of vending Interim protection

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate. v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....

15 May 2023 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO; HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANO... · 2023:DHC:3375-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's closure of a contempt petition, holding that eligibility criteria for Ayurvedic Compounder posts must be strictly met and prior orders not designated as precedent cannot be extended to others.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant eligibility criteria Ayurvedic Compounder Central Administrative Tribunal precedent

The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation – 3 v. Sumitomo Corporation

15 May 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:4201-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order granting credit for tax deducted at source on advances for offshore supplies, holding that TDS wrongly deducted under a cancelled Section 195(2) order cannot be denied credit when the income is not assessable in India.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant tax deducted at source Section 195(2) Section 199 offshore supplies

Hans Uttam Finance Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Central Excise, Goods and Service Tax, Delhi South Commissionerate & Ors.

15 May 2023 · Vibhu Bakhrhu; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:3454-DB

Delhi High Court held that tax dues admitted by the taxpayer in undisputed written communication before 30.06.2019 constitute quantification under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, entitling the petitioner to its benefits despite pending investigation.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Sabka Vishwas Scheme Finance Act (No.2), 2019 quantification of tax dues service tax

Harpreet Mehta v. Anurag Mehta

15 May 2023 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain · 2023:DHC:3399-DB

The Delhi High Court directed interim maintenance of Rs. 20,000 per month to be paid by the respondent-husband pending divorce proceedings, with arrears payable in installments, without prejudice to final family court adjudication.

family appeal_allowed interim maintenance Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act divorce proceedings family court

Deepak Aggarwal v. Mukesh Aggarwal

15 May 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:3478

The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to reconsider a non-resident petitioner’s request for rescheduling personal appearance or allowing video conferencing in a civil suit interlocutory proceeding under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

civil other Order VII Rule 11 CPC personal appearance non-resident litigant video conferencing

Naval Yadav v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

15 May 2023 · Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2023:DHC:3635-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner's case during the survey under the Street Vendors Act, protecting his right to trade pending final decision, and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.

administrative petition_dismissed Street Vendors Act 2014 Section 3(3) Town Vending Committee vending certificate

Deepak & Anr. v. State and Other

15 May 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:3355
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR involving serious offences, holding that such FIRs should not be quashed merely on compromise or alleged misunderstanding grounds.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC cognizable offence compromise

Master Arnesh Shaw v. Union of India & Anr.

15 May 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:3423

The Delhi High Court constituted a National Rare Diseases’ Committee to oversee implementation of the National Policy for Rare Diseases, ensuring funding, clinical trials, and access to affordable therapies for children suffering from rare diseases.

constitutional other Significant Rare Diseases National Policy for Rare Diseases Indigenization of Therapies Clinical Trials

Ravina Bansal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 29(1) & Anr.

15 May 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:4245-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Assessing Officer to verify the petitioner’s belated reply and provide a personal hearing before passing assessment order under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax other Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(b) Section 148A(d)

Vinod v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

15 May 2023 · Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2023:DHC:3634-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner's case during the survey under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, and dismissed the writ petition without granting further relief.

administrative petition_dismissed Street Vendors Act 2014 Section 3(3) Town Vending Committee Certificate of vending

Sh. Anil Kumar Jain & Anr. v. Bhagwan Mahavir Memorial Samiti & Ors.

15 May 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:3367

The Delhi High Court held that non-compliance with Order I Rule 8 CPC for suing in representative capacity does not mandate dismissal of the suit if plaintiffs have individual cause of action, restoring the suit for trial on merits.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant Order I Rule 8 CPC representative suit leave of court non-compliance

Sandeep Gupta v. Shri Ram Steel Traders & Anr.

15 May 2023 · Jasmeet Singh · 2023:DHC:3359
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that insolvency moratorium under the IBC does not stay criminal proceedings under Section 138/141 NI Act against a director as a natural person.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act Interim moratorium Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

Dhananjay Rathi v. Shree Vasu Steels Private Limited & Ors.

15 May 2023 · Amit Bansal · 2023:DHC:3345

The Delhi High Court vacated an ex parte interim injunction restraining use of the trademark RATHI, holding that concurrent registered proprietors and their bona fide licensees have lawful rights to use the mark under valid licenses.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement concurrent registration permitted use interim injunction

Jagdish Narayan Pandey v. New Delhi Municipal Council

15 May 2023 · Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2023:DHC:4576-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner’s case during the survey under the Street Vendors Act, allowing peaceful vending pending the survey, and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.

administrative petition_dismissed Street Vendors Act 2014 Town Vending Committee Survey of street vendors Certificate of vending

Paliwal Infrastructure Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, PCIT, Delhi - 7 & Anr.

15 May 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:4244-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that a revision petition under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act must be decided on merits if no appeal has been filed against the assessment order, setting aside the dismissal on the ground of premature filing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 264 revision petition assessment order

IJM REWA (MAURITIUS) LTD v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

15 May 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:4206-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the assessment order and notice under the Income Tax Act for non-receipt of notice and directed the Assessing Officer to provide a fresh opportunity to the petitioner to respond.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148A(b) Section 148A(d) Section 148

The Commissioner of Central Tax, Delhi North v. M/S OM Fragrances & Anr.

15 May 2023 · Vibhu BakhrU; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:3468-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the amended Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, 2008 cannot be applied retrospectively for excise duty computation in searches conducted before the amendment came into force, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, 2008 retrospective effect delegated legislation

Bharat Agarwal & Ors v. NMDC Limited

15 May 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:3479

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to hand over keys of the disputed property to the petitioners under Section 151 CPC without prejudice to the parties' substantive rights and contentions.

civil petition_allowed Section 151 CPC possession handing over keys interim relief