Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Paliwal Infrastructure Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, PCIT, Delhi - 7 & Anr.

15 May 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:4244-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a revision petition under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act must be decided on merits if no appeal has been filed against the assessment order, setting aside the dismissal on the ground of premature filing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 264 revision petition assessment order

IJM REWA (MAURITIUS) LTD v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

15 May 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:4206-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the assessment order and notice under the Income Tax Act for non-receipt of notice and directed the Assessing Officer to provide a fresh opportunity to the petitioner to respond.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148A(b) Section 148A(d) Section 148

The Commissioner of Central Tax, Delhi North v. M/S OM Fragrances & Anr.

15 May 2023 · Vibhu BakhrU; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:3468-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the amended Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, 2008 cannot be applied retrospectively for excise duty computation in searches conducted before the amendment came into force, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, 2008 retrospective effect delegated legislation

Bharat Agarwal & Ors v. NMDC Limited

15 May 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:3479

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to hand over keys of the disputed property to the petitioners under Section 151 CPC without prejudice to the parties' substantive rights and contentions.

civil petition_allowed Section 151 CPC possession handing over keys interim relief

IJM Dewas (Mauritius) Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

15 May 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:4207-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for non-receipt of notice under Section 148A(b), granting the assessee a fresh opportunity to respond.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148A(b) Section 148A(d) Notice non-receipt

Kallu v. State of Uttar Pradesh

15 May 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murder under Section 302 IPC, affirming the reliability of eyewitness and medical evidence despite claims of false implication.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness testimony post-mortem report

IDBI Bank Ltd. v. Power Finance Corporation Ltd. & Ors.

12 May 2023 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023:DHC:3447
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging invocation of bank guarantees, holding that contractual disputes involving State entities without public law elements are not maintainable under Article 226.

civil petition_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 bank guarantee contractual dispute

Novo Medi Sciences Pvt Ltd v. Union of India

12 May 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:3307-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a tender bid for non-submission of mandatory DPIIT registration, emphasizing deference to tendering authority's interpretation absent mala fide or perversity.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender rejection DPIIT registration certificate public procurement judicial review

Bijender Singh and Anr. v. Iqbal Singh and Ors.

12 May 2023 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2023:DHC:3286

The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's dismissal of interim injunction application in a specific performance suit and remanded the matter for fresh hearing considering additional evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural interim injunction Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC specific performance Agreement to Sell

Navin Sinha v. Naveta Sinha

12 May 2023 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain · 2023:DHC:3391-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a Family Court cannot return a matrimonial petition on forum non conveniens grounds before issuing summons when jurisdiction under Section 19 of the Hindu Marriage Act is prima facie established.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 19 jurisdiction forum non conveniens Family Court jurisdiction

Sri Ragavendra College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education

12 May 2023 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023:DHC:3395

The Delhi High Court set aside the NCTE appellate committee's order withdrawing recognition of an educational institution for insufficient reasoning and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with proper reasons.

administrative other Significant NCTE Act 1993 Recognition withdrawal Faculty list compliance Administrative orders reasoning

Azmat Ali Khan v. Union of India & Ors.

12 May 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:3278

The Delhi High Court ordered interim blocking of online videos and news items threatening the petitioner’s safety and investigation integrity in an ongoing FIR case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant online content blocking interim relief FIR investigation digital media regulation

Paramjit Singh v. Hardaman Singh & Ors.

12 May 2023 · Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2023:DHC:4971-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the interlocutory appeal as withdrawn, directing the trial court to expeditiously decide the pending injunction application in a partition suit involving a registered will.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural ad interim injunction interlocutory appeal partition suit registered will

Deepak Jain v. Income Tax Officer Ward 44(1), Delhi & Ors.

12 May 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:3904-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices for AY 2017-18 due to lack of specified authority approval and escaped income below the statutory threshold under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax petition_allowed reassessment proceedings Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 149(1)(b)

Hamdard National Foundation India v. Government of NCT Delhi

12 May 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:3347

The Delhi High Court directed that the term 'Raughan-E-Badam Shireen' is reserved for Unani medicines and that licensing authorities must ensure compliance with the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and Rules, disposing of the petition accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed Raughan-E-Badam Shireen Badam Tail Unani medicine Ayurvedic medicine

INFINITI RETAIL LIMITED v. CROMA THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR & ORS.

12 May 2023 · AMIT BANSAL · 2023:DHC:3357

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Infiniti Retail Limited, restraining unauthorized use of its well-known "CROMA" trademark in a domain name and ordering transfer of the domain to the plaintiff.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off well-known trademark domain name dispute

Union of India and Ors. v. Anjana Dutta

12 May 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:3275-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court remanded the pay scale dispute of a government employee back to the Tribunal for reconsideration of her designation and pay scale entitlement in light of relevant government orders and judicial precedents.

administrative other Significant pay scale fixation designation isolated post Central Administrative Tribunal

Dilip Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

12 May 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:3273-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the appointment to the now-abolished post of Deputy Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities as the issue was rendered academic by subsequent legislation.

administrative petition_dismissed Deputy Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities appointment abolished post Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995

M/S. DELHI MARKETING v. ZYDUS WELLNESS LIMITED

12 May 2023 · Manmohan; Saurabh Banerjee · 2023:DHC:3302-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal and granted interim injunction restraining respondent's use of deceptively similar trademark 'SugarLite' for allied goods, emphasizing likelihood of confusion and prior registration rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement interlocutory injunction likelihood of confusion cognate goods

SMT KARTARI DEVI v. SH. VINOD KUMAR AND ORS.

12 May 2023 · TUSHAR RAO GEDELA · 2023:DHC:3406

The Delhi High Court directed the Appellate Authority under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 to expedite disposal of the appeal in accordance with the statutory one-month timeline, emphasizing the protective intent of the Act.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 Section 16(6) Appellate Authority statutory timeline