Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
Naresh Pal v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the petitioner failed to prove violation of Section 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and upheld the termination as neither illegal nor unjustified.
Maj Pankaj Rai v. NIIT Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking termination of an arbitrator's mandate under Section 14(1)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the petitioner failed to establish grounds of ineligibility or inability to perform functions.
Yogesh Bansal alias Kake v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal, upholding his conviction for murder based on reliable ocular, medical, and ballistic evidence despite challenges to witness credibility and recovery of weapon.
Sudip Singh @ Sudeep Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal for compensation for injuries sustained in a railway accident, condoned delay in filing the appeal, and remanded the matter for compensation award despite absence of contemporaneous railway records.
Rajesh Shukla & Anr. v. UCO Bank & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition directing the parties to seek expeditious disposal of the pending review application before the DRT and maintained status quo in the interim.
Sidhivinayak Chemtech Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner, CGST, Meerut & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a provisional attachment order under Section 83 of the CGST Act for lack of territorial jurisdiction and absence of tangible material justifying attachment to protect government revenue.
Mukesh Rajora v. Pension Trust & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Pension Trust is liable to pay pension and terminal benefits to employees who opted for voluntary retirement under Rule 48A after transfer from DVB to DISCOMs, directing release of dues withheld since 2020.
Harmeet Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that simultaneous disciplinary proceedings and inquiry for the same allegations are impermissible and directed termination of the inquiry while allowing continuation of disciplinary proceedings with amended charge-sheet if necessary.
Ashok & Ors. v. Khyali Ram & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Executing Court's order issuing warrants of possession in execution of a permanent injunction decree, affirming that such execution under Order XXI Rule 32(5) CPC applies to both prohibitory and mandatory injunctions and rejecting fraud allegations lacking particulars.
Suresh Kumar Rathee v. The Registrar Co Operative Group Housing Societies Parliament Street Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that in absence of an appeal under the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, a speaking order by the Registrar can be challenged by filing a revision petition under Section 116 before the Financial Commissioner, and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
MANOJ KUMAR MANN v. DR SHAMBHUJI
The Delhi High Court held that the Trial Court erred in refusing to take on record a written statement filed within the Supreme Court’s extended limitation period and directed the Trial Court to proceed accordingly.
Rita Saxena v. Center for Railway Information Systems
The Delhi High Court reviewed and set aside the reduction of performance appraisal marks due to arbitrariness and lack of communication, directing reconsideration of grading in favor of the petitioner.
Mohsin Akhtar and Anr. v. ICICI Bank and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recovery proceedings must first be pursued against the property developer and landowner before proceeding against allottees, dismissing the petition challenging premature recovery action.
Vineet Gupta v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition concerning double allotment of a flat, directing parties to seek remedies before the NCLT as per the DRT recovery order.
Nirmal Chandra Mandal v. DG CISF
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF to decide the petitioner's pending representation against his transfer within a stipulated time, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Department of Transport, GNCTD v. Star Bus Services Pvt Ltd
Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award against the Department of Transport, GNCTD, dismissing challenges of fraud and delay, affirming limited court interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Hridesh Kumar Pathak v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recovery proceedings against the petitioner cannot proceed until recovery against other defendants is exhausted, and refused to stay the proceedings but protected the petitioner's rights pending further remedies.
M/S MN AUTOMOBILE PRIVATE LIMITED v. GURIQBAL SINGH & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to condone delay in filing the written statement under the Commercial Courts Act, emphasizing adjudication on merits over procedural technicalities.
Mohit Bhanot v. Anupam Batura
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to examine witnesses as per an amended list despite non-payment of costs due to COVID-19 delays, imposing compensatory costs on the petitioner to protect the respondent's interests.
Meet Malhotra v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that members of rifle clubs may only temporarily use a third firearm for target practice under license and must not possess more than two firearms, dismissing a review petition challenging this interpretation.