Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
Ritu Johari v. Vineet Taneja
The Delhi High Court set aside a Family Court order granting visitation rights without considering Child Counsellor reports and remitted the matter for fresh consideration with the reports on record.
Kama Ayurveda Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that voluntary disclosure and payment of excise duty before the cut-off date constitute quantification of tax dues under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, directing acceptance of the petitioner’s application and issuance of discharge certificate.
Dr. Ravindra Narayan Mishra v. Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Khalsa College and Ors.
Employees appointed temporarily before 01.01.2004 and regularized thereafter are entitled to pension under the Old Pension Scheme, not the New Pension Scheme.
Shiv Kumar Sharma v. Phool Chand Om Prakash & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld a lawful Settlement Agreement between parties, modified the decree accordingly, and disposed of the appeals as settled.
Nishan Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that age eligibility for remusteration as Constable (Driver) is to be determined at the time of joining the training course, and possession of a heavy vehicle license is not mandatory prior to remusteration, thereby allowing the petitioners' remusteration.
Mange Ram Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 36 (1), Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for failure to consider the petitioner's attempt to respond due to portal closure and remanded the matter for a fresh hearing.
Ramashray Private ITI v. Directorate General of Training Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship Government of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of an ITI's affiliation application for failure to submit documents without hearing, directing fresh consideration with due opportunity to the petitioner.
Pratyaksh Apparels Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside assessment orders and demand notices under the Income Tax Act for breach of natural justice, directing fresh proceedings with adequate opportunity and personal hearing.
Rizawan Ali v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner’s representation in accordance with the Street Vendors Act, 2014, providing interim protection pending survey completion.
Jagat Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal partly, holding that the plaintiff was entitled to fees for 4845 hearings at prescribed rates with interest, drawing adverse inference against the defendant for non-production of documents.
Delhi Development Authority v. Merta Investment Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the allotment of a plot to the Respondent with a pro-rata price reduction despite DDA's cancellation, affirming writ jurisdiction against arbitrary State action even in presence of an arbitration clause.
Union of India v. Ashwani Kumar Soni
The Delhi High Court modified the Tribunal's order allowing LTC reimbursement for tickets purchased from unauthorized agents but permitted recovery of the excess amount claimed by the employee.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi -7 v. Unitech Reliable Projects Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that a penalty notice under Section 271(1)(c) must specify the limb of penalty proceedings, and failure to do so invalidates the penalty.
Ramakant v. Income Tax Officer, Ward Int Tax 3(1)(2) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition holding that reassessment notices under Sections 148 and 142(1) of the Income Tax Act were valid despite the petitioner having filed his return, as the AO had reason to believe income had escaped assessment.
Dhananjay Singh Rathore & Anr. v. M/S Parviom Technologies Pvt Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitrator's order striking off petitioners' witness affidavits, holding that denying the right to lead evidence violates natural justice and is impermissible.
Atul Agarwal v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the statutory powers of SEBI and stock exchanges to suspend and delist securities under the existing regulatory framework, dismissing the petition challenging investor protection mechanisms.
Hari Chand and Ors. v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi through Divisional Commissioner and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of a pending land dispute by the revenue authority and ordered maintenance of status quo in possession during the proceedings.
Avinash Jain v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court held that filing an incomplete chargesheet to defeat statutory bail rights under Section 167(2) CrPC violates Article 21, and granted default bail to the petitioner where investigation under the Prevention of Corruption Act was pending due to lack of sanction.
GOVIND PRASAD TODI & ANR. v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that prosecution under Section 138 NI Act against directors is barred during the moratorium period under the IBC when control vests in the Interim Resolution Professional.
Shruti Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Sports Authority of India to constitute a selection committee for karate team selection for the 19th Asian Games in absence of a recognized national federation, ensuring adherence to IOA rules and transparency.