Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
Praveen Kumar Bhardwaj v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices under Sections 148A and 148 of the Income Tax Act, directing the Assessing Officer to provide detailed transaction break-ups and conduct a fresh hearing before proceeding.
Subrata Barman and Ors. v. Staff Selection Commission and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed re-measurement of petitioners' height by an independent medical officer and allowed them to participate in further recruitment stages if found qualified.
Kiran Thakur v. Resident Commissioner Bihar Bhawan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging dismissal from service for submitting a forged educational certificate, holding that such misconduct justifies termination even if the qualification was not a pre-requisite.
Tirth Ram Sharma v. Rajiv Babuta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that courts must consider limitation suo motu under Section 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963, setting aside orders that failed to do so, while dismissing the petition on other grounds.
Veer Bahadur v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner's representation and conduct the survey under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, dismissing the writ petition without granting further relief.
M Ehtesham Ul Haque v. Union of India Department of Higher Education
The Delhi High Court upheld the appointment of Professor Najma Akhtar as Vice Chancellor of Jamia Millia Islamia, ruling that the selection process complied with statutory provisions and that the Visitor’s discretion in appointment was lawful and not subject to interference.
Sushil Kumar Goyal & Ors. v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld that settlement applications under Section 245C(1) of the Income Tax Act are maintainable only if a 'case' is pending under Section 245A(b), and no case is pending without issuance of reassessment notice under Section 148.
Rajkumar Bukya v. Director General Coast Guard Headquarters and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Coast Guard authorities to decide the petitioner's pending resignation representation with reasons within four weeks, emphasizing the duty to provide reasoned orders and timely decisions.
Kopal Bakshi v. PR Commissioner of Income Tax 10 & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an income tax assessment order for failure to consider the petitioner’s timely reply, directing fresh proceedings in accordance with principles of natural justice.
IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. ASHIT SAHA
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award directing payment of back wages including increments to a retrenched employee reinstated with continuity of service, holding that such increments form part of full back wages and that applications under Section 33C(2) are maintainable despite delay.
Resilient Innovations Pvt. Ltd. v. PhonePe Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that intra-court appeals lie against dismissal of rectification applications under the Trademarks Act, 1999 (Amended), but upheld dismissal under Section 124 barring rectification without leave when a suit on trademark validity is pending and invalidity is pleaded.
S Khan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner’s representation and conduct the survey in accordance with the Street Vendors Act, protecting the petitioner from dispossession until such process is complete.
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Kamlesh Jha & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurance company is not liable to pay compensation if the offending vehicle was not insured with it due to a fake cover note, and upheld the award of future prospects in a permanent disability motor accident claim.
Jatinder Pahwa v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed exemption applications related to filing trial court records and directed consideration of stay applications together, disposing of the petition with no order as to costs.
OUM LAMITECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 19(1), DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court set aside the reopening order under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act against OUM Lamitech Private Limited for failure to consider relevant documents and directed the AO to furnish material linking the petitioner to alleged escaped income before proceeding further.
M/S SEVILLE PRODUCTS LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS EXPORTS, ICD-TUGHLAKABAD, NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court upheld penalties against an overseas exporter for abetting customs duty evasion through false invoicing and held that settlement by co-noticees does not absolve others from liability under the Customs Act.
Atul Chawla v. Manisha Gangahar
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of an appeal against a divorce decree upon mutual settlement and undertakings by parties to withdraw related proceedings and claims.
Neelam & Ors. v. Bajaj Allianz Insurance Company Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the claimants' appeal enhancing compensation by applying Delhi minimum wages for the deceased's loss of dependency, holding that unchallenged evidence established his livelihood in Delhi.
FYBROS ELECTRIC PVT LTD v. MUKESH SINGH & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to remove a deceptively similar trademark registered for identical goods, applying Section 11(1)(b) and Section 57(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, emphasizing phonetic similarity and likelihood of confusion.
Bishan Das Goyal HUF v. The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14
The Delhi High Court upheld the Income Tax Settlement Commission's rejection of the petitioner's settlement application for certain assessment years due to absence of pending assessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act.