Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
ATUL CHAWLA ..... Appellant
For the Appellant: Mr. Anand with Mr.Rajeshwari Niruratirao Reddy, Advocates with appellant in person.
For the Respondent: Ms. Shreya Singal and Mr. Sarthak Bhardwaj, Advocates with respondent in person.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
1. Appellant, who is present in person and also represented through counsel seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal.
2. Parties are present in person. We have interacted with the parties. Parties have produced the following Identity proof:
3. Appellant submits that he accepts and acknowledges the decree of divorce granted by the Court on 24.09.2022 and henceforth does not wish to impugn the same. He undertakes that he shall not challenge or impugn the decree of divorce dated 24.09.2022 under any circumstances in future.
4. The undertaking is accepted.
5. In view of the above undertaking given by the appellant, the respondent, who is present in person, submits that she shall withdraw, compound and give ‘no objection’ to the quashing of the FIR No.209/2019 under Sections 498A/406 IPC, Police Station C.R. Park.
6. Respondent submits that in view of the fact that the appellant had impugned the order, she has also filed a petition seeking divorce and she undertakes to withdraw the said petition.
7. Both the parties undertake that they have no claim against each other of any nature inter alia maintenance/alimony past, present or future, dowry, streedhan. Both the parties agree that all their inter se disputes of every nature are fully and finally settled and they shall not file any claim or petition against each other in future.
8. The undertakings are accepted. Parties are bound down to the undertakings given to Court.
9. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J MANOJ JAIN, J MAY 18, 2023