Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
Amarjeet Singh v. The Principal Happy Hours School & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that strict neighbourhood criteria need not be enforced for EWS/DG admissions, directing the school to admit the petitioner despite his residence being 8 km away.
Ramesh Chandra Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide the petitioner's grievance regarding the transfer order and transfer allowance within a stipulated time, without quashing the impugned order.
Bhagoli v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner’s representation expeditiously under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, ensuring protection of his livelihood as a street vendor.
Vijay v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to allow the petitioner to vend at the allotted site strictly in accordance with the Certificate of Vending and its terms, restraining arbitrary interference.
Forum of Indian Legists v. Union of India, Ministry of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a belated and frivolous PIL challenging university appointments, reaffirming that PILs in service matters with delay and lacking genuine public interest are not maintainable.
Sistema Asia Fund Pte Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment orders and notices for deviating from original allegations in the income tax notice, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural requirements under the Income Tax Act.
S. Mamman v. UOI Thr. Labour Enforcement Officer
The Delhi High Court held that officers of public sector undertakings are not public servants requiring sanction under Section 197 CrPC, and refused to quash complaint proceedings against the petitioner, leaving factual disputes for trial.
Narendra Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's absorption case as per the applicable policy within two weeks, disposing of the writ petition without granting interim relief.
Jagdish Rai & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the grant of one annual increment to petitioners and similarly situated retirees, following the Supreme Court's ruling affirming entitlement to such increments before retirement.
MS ANANYA TIWARI v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDRY EDUCATION
The Delhi High Court directed CBSE to declare the petitioner's examination results for subjects appeared in despite non-appearance in compulsory Hindi, allowing compartment exam for Hindi and consolidated result thereafter.
Deeksha & Anr. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Education to allot admission under the Freeship category to eligible children denied admission under the EWS/DG category in schools near their residences.
Sanjeev Srivastava and Another v. State of NCT of Delhi and Other
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a commercial dispute after the parties amicably settled, applying its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Anil Kumar Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the BSF to treat the petition as a representation seeking MACP benefits and decide it within eight weeks by a reasoned order.
Tarun Kumar & Anr. v. The Principal Happy Hours School & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that schools cannot deny admission under the EWS/DG category solely for non-fulfillment of neighbourhood criteria and directed admission of petitioners despite their residence being 4 km away.
Deep Chand Kumar v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a courier service proprietor accused under the NDPS Act, holding that procedural lapses in sampling and delay in trial justify bail, while conscious possession and sampling issues are to be decided at trial.
Masibur Khan v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
Delhi High Court dismissed bail application in a commercial quantity NDPS case holding that alleged procedural lapses in sampling do not vitiate trial absent demonstrated prejudice, and such issues are to be examined during trial.
Panna Impex v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration due to a vague show cause notice and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with an opportunity of hearing.
Sunder Singh v. The Director General & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation against transfer orders within three weeks, restraining transfer till then.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Rajdeep Harrison & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's compensation award for personal injury, dismissing the insurer's appeal against the quantum of future loss of income and disability assessment.
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Priyanka Sen & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal to reduce compensation by applying the correct one-third deduction for the deceased's personal expenses in a motor accident claim.