Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
Sanjay v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 363 IPC on the ground of compromise and absence of malafide intent, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Shahnaz Khatoon & Ors. v. GD Goenka Public School
The Delhi High Court directed GD Goenka Public School to admit petitioners allotted seats under the EWS/DG category, holding that denial on grounds like unverifiable address or document issues violates Article 21A and the Right to Education Act.
DHIRU REALESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED v. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 7(1), DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside the income tax assessment order for relying on undisclosed allegations beyond the scope of the notice, emphasizing the requirement of natural justice under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act.
Raj Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and related proceedings under Sections 509, 354, and 34 IPC arising from a family property dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Anis Ahmed Saifi v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 324 IPC in a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Manju Vats & Ors. v. Meena Pandey
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiffs' challenge to a sale deed executed to obtain a loan is not barred by the doctrine of pari delicto or limitation, allowing the suit to proceed to trial.
Rishabh Rawat v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail in a rape case involving allegations of breach of promise to marry, holding that such issues require trial and applying the 'bail not jail' principle.
DLF Commercial Projects Corporation v. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an income tax assessment order passed without granting a requested personal hearing, directing a fresh hearing and speaking order in compliance with natural justice.
INTER IKEA SYSTEMS BV v. BR RETAIL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit in terms of a lawful settlement wherein the defendants acknowledged the plaintiff's trademark ownership and agreed to cease use of infringing marks.
Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. v. Windlas Biotech Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court decreed the suit in terms of a lawful settlement between Sun Pharma and Windlas Biotech regarding the trademark 'PANTRACID', ending the dispute amicably under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
Jagdish Prasad v. Govt. of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to permit the petitioner to vend within the specified zone strictly in accordance with his Certificate of Vending under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
Rajib Saha v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 10(1) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax Officer to provide a personal hearing and stay enforcement of a recovery notice against a director pending adjudication of a long-pending appeal.
Shri Pankaj Asthana v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others
The Delhi High Court directed the authorities to adjudicate the petitioner's pending representation regarding forged sale deeds and unauthorized construction within six months.
IMPRESARIO ENTERTAINMENT & HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. v. S & D HOSPITALITY
The Delhi High Court held that it lacked territorial jurisdiction under Section 134(2) of the Trade Marks Act as the plaintiff did not plead Delhi as its principal place of business and the cause of action did not arise there, dismissing the review petition.
Mohd. Kashif Khan and Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage by mutual consent.
Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited v. E! Entertainment Television LLC
The Delhi High Court upheld its jurisdiction and interim injunction restraining the defendant from using marks deceptively similar to the plaintiff's 'NOW' family of trademarks, recognizing cause of action arising in Delhi and maintaining the suit as a quia timet action.
Gauri Shankar Jaiswal v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail in an NDPS case holding that alleged procedural lapses in sampling contraband do not warrant bail without showing prejudice, emphasizing that such issues are to be examined during trial.
Kanchan v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner’s representation expeditiously under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, protecting her right to livelihood pending formal certification.
Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the DG BSF to treat the petition as a representation and decide the petitioners' claims for pay benefits and arrears within eight weeks by a reasoned order.
TATA SIA AIRLINES LIMITED v. VISTARA HOME APPLIANCES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the Trial Court's order dismissing interim injunction, holding that the appellant's prior adoption and well-known trademark 'VISTARA' was infringed by respondents' mala fide use despite different class registrations.