Delhi High Court
63,782 judgments
Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. v. Windlas Biotech Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court decreed the suit in terms of a lawful settlement between Sun Pharma and Windlas Biotech regarding the trademark 'PANTRACID', ending the dispute amicably under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
Jagdish Prasad v. Govt. of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to permit the petitioner to vend within the specified zone strictly in accordance with his Certificate of Vending under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
Rajib Saha v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 10(1) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax Officer to provide a personal hearing and stay enforcement of a recovery notice against a director pending adjudication of a long-pending appeal.
Shri Pankaj Asthana v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others
The Delhi High Court directed the authorities to adjudicate the petitioner's pending representation regarding forged sale deeds and unauthorized construction within six months.
IMPRESARIO ENTERTAINMENT & HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. v. S & D HOSPITALITY
The Delhi High Court held that it lacked territorial jurisdiction under Section 134(2) of the Trade Marks Act as the plaintiff did not plead Delhi as its principal place of business and the cause of action did not arise there, dismissing the review petition.
Mohd. Kashif Khan and Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage by mutual consent.
Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited v. E! Entertainment Television LLC
The Delhi High Court upheld its jurisdiction and interim injunction restraining the defendant from using marks deceptively similar to the plaintiff's 'NOW' family of trademarks, recognizing cause of action arising in Delhi and maintaining the suit as a quia timet action.
Gauri Shankar Jaiswal v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail in an NDPS case holding that alleged procedural lapses in sampling contraband do not warrant bail without showing prejudice, emphasizing that such issues are to be examined during trial.
Kanchan v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner’s representation expeditiously under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, protecting her right to livelihood pending formal certification.
Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the DG BSF to treat the petition as a representation and decide the petitioners' claims for pay benefits and arrears within eight weeks by a reasoned order.
TATA SIA AIRLINES LIMITED v. VISTARA HOME APPLIANCES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the Trial Court's order dismissing interim injunction, holding that the appellant's prior adoption and well-known trademark 'VISTARA' was infringed by respondents' mala fide use despite different class registrations.
Pradeep Kumar @ Sandeep Sharma v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of cheating and forgery after recovery of substantial amount and forged documents, considering his custodial period and clean antecedents.
Swadesh Pal Gupta v. Late Smt. Shakuntala Harit through LR Amrit Prakash Harit
The Delhi High Court fixed interim use and occupation charges at Rs. 25,000 per month and stayed eviction pending revision petition, balancing tenant's rights and landlord's entitlement based on market rent and premises condition.
Bishamber Singh and Anr v. Sanjay Bhardwaj
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expeditiously dispose of a civil suit pending since 2010, due to delays caused by the respondent's frivolous applications.
Securities & Exchange Board of India v. Arihant Jain & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of summons against a director in a SEBI securities violation case, holding that mere directorship without specific allegations of control or responsibility does not attract liability under Section 27 of the SEBI Act.
Vikram Ruhal v. Delhi Police & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that mere pendency of a criminal case and placement in Column 12 of the charge-sheet without summons cannot justify indefinite withholding of police appointment, directing immediate appointment of the petitioner.
Maj Gen. V.K. Singh (Retd.) v. C.B.I.
The Delhi High Court upheld the FIR and proceedings against Maj Gen. V.K. Singh (Retd.) under the Official Secrets Act, ruling that investigation and cognizance were lawful despite absence of prior sanction, and that procedural requirements were properly followed.
Rajesh v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner’s representation and conduct the survey in accordance with the Street Vendors Act, protecting the petitioner’s right to livelihood as a street vendor.
Dushyant Kumar @ Dushyant Nagar v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323/341/506/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Vishal Mehta & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.