Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
Ajit Kumar and Others v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to allow duly licensed street vendors to vend peacefully within their zones strictly in accordance with their Certificates of Vending and applicable laws.
Subhash Mendiratta v. Sureshb Mendiratta
The Delhi High Court held that a suit cannot be dismissed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC solely on the basis of a DNA report without formal expert evidence and trial, emphasizing the need for clear admissions before summary judgment.
Verizon Trademark Services LLC & Ors. v. Vikash Kumar
The Delhi High Court declared the trademark VERIZON as a well-known trademark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, granting it protection in relation to telecommunication services.
Omansh Thakur v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the 75% Class XII marks eligibility criterion for NIT admissions and dismissed the petition of a candidate who failed to meet this criterion and complete admission formalities.
Kanwal Nain Singh & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a private neighbor dispute based on a mutual settlement, subject to conditions including tree plantation to promote social good.
Rajiv Kumar & Ors. v. The State Govt NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled and obtained a mutual consent divorce.
Ravinder Dabas v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging land mutation due to inordinate delay and held that non-substitution of legal representatives of a deceased respondent led to abatement of the appeal in toto.
Union of India v. M/S Parishudh Machines Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed release of the entire deposited arbitral Award amount to the MSME respondent under its inherent powers after dismissal of the challenge petition, subject to security, to prevent undue hardship and ensure justice.
Pradeep Kumar Verma & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Ragini Sharma v. NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a theft FIR under Section 380 IPC on the ground of an amicable family settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Raju Ranjan v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory typing speed requirement for SSA post must be relaxed for candidates with one arm disability, granting exemption and directing appointment of the petitioner.
Anup Kumar @ Anoop & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs under Sections 308, 341, 506, and 34 IPC on the basis of a bona fide compromise between neighbors, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and promote social harmony.
Capt. Amit Kumar Yadav v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the DGCA's suspension of a pilot's license based on positive pre-flight breath analyzer tests, rejecting reliance on subsequent blood and urine tests and affirming the regulatory procedure's validity.
Dr. Yatin Malhotra v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a candidate for Armed Forces Medical Services on medical grounds, refusing to interfere with prescribed dental fitness standards applied uniformly to all candidates.
Sanjay Kalra v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed a civil contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of a 2014 order, holding that subsequent court permissions and compelling circumstances negated any wilful contempt.
Iftikhar Saifi v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of theft and criminal trespass, subject to conditions ensuring cooperation with investigation and compliance with court directions.
Gurupreet Sangla v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside assessment orders passed without granting personal hearings under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the necessity of natural justice and procedural compliance.
Vijay v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder, holding that inconclusive evidence and inadmissible co-accused statements do not justify continued custody pending trial.
Ashish Gupta v. State Govt NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a large-scale economic offence case under section 406 IPC, emphasizing parity with co-accused, adequacy of alternative security, and completion of investigation.
DR RAMESH CHANDER MUNJAL & ORS. v. DR SURAJ MUNJAL & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a review petition challenging the direction to list two suits together, holding that an erroneous submission by counsel without consequential error is not a ground for review.