Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Banashri Guha Neogi and Others v. Union of India and Others

10 Jul 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:4593

The Delhi High Court upheld the exclusion of 'special allowance' from pay fixation on deputation to Debts Recovery Tribunals, ruling that pay fixation is governed by DoPT O.M. 17.06.2010 which does not include special allowance as part of basic pay.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant pay fixation special allowance deputation DoPT O.M. 17.06.2010

Ultratech Cement Ltd. v. Maxout Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.

10 Jul 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:4703

The Delhi High Court clarified that winding up petitions transferred to the NCLT must be treated as applications for initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under the IBC before liquidation.

corporate petition_allowed Significant winding up petition Section 434 Companies Act 2013 Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016

Yogesh Kumar v. Union of India and Others

10 Jul 2023 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain · 2023:DHC:4733-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the medical board's rejection of the petitioner on hypertension grounds for non-compliance with mandatory medical examination guidelines and directed a fresh examination.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Review Medical Board hypertension medical examination guidelines hospitalization

Master Arnesh Shaw v. Union of India & Anr.

10 Jul 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh

Delhi High Court directs expedited clinical trials and medicine procurement for rare disease patients, emphasizing continuous treatment and effective use of government funds despite lack of formal drug approvals.

constitutional other Significant rare diseases clinical trials medicine procurement marketing approval

Ria Raj v. Commissioner of Police & Ors.

10 Jul 2023 · Siddharth Mridul; Gaurang Kanth · 2023:DHC:4605-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a habeas corpus petition by making a mediated settlement on custody and visitation rights of minor children an order of the Court, emphasizing the enforceability of such agreements under Article 226.

family petition_allowed habeas corpus custody minor children settlement agreement

Shakeel Ahmad v. Jamia Millia Islamia

10 Jul 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:4594

The Delhi High Court held that a Research Assistant performing teaching duties at Jamia Millia Islamia qualifies as a "teacher" under the university's statute and regulations, entitling him to retire at 65 years instead of 60.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant age of superannuation Research Assistant teacher definition Jamia Millia Islamia Act 1988

Capital Land Builders Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. M/s Shaheed Memorial Society & Ors.

10 Jul 2023 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:4606

The Delhi High Court held that a suit alleging fraudulent shareholding cannot be dismissed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC without clear admissions, emphasizing that share transfer proof extends beyond transfer deeds to statutory company records.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC share transfer deeds Companies Act 1956 Register of Members

Surpreet Singh Alias Rishu v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.)

10 Jul 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:4823

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under IPC sections 285, 336, and 337 following an amicable settlement between the parties and exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement inherent powers of High Court

Vikash Mathur v. Kotak Mahindra Bank and Anr.

10 Jul 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:4821

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the DRT's order under SARFAESI Act, holding that statutory remedies must be exhausted before invoking writ jurisdiction.

civil petition_dismissed SARFAESI Act, 2002 Debt Recovery Tribunal Article 227 Ministry of Finance notification

Kundan Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation

10 Jul 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:4737

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to recall witnesses under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for further cross-examination, emphasizing the court's duty to ensure a just decision by exercising wide discretion to summon witnesses at any stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 311 Cr.P.C. recall of witnesses just decision of case cross-examination

Dr Kumar Alok v. Anish Dayal Singh DG ITBP and Ors

10 Jul 2023 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain · 2023:DHC:4713-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging violation of a no-coercive-action order, holding that actions taken without knowledge of the order and subsequently withdrawn do not constitute contempt.

civil petition_dismissed Contempt of Court Act, 1971 contempt of court willful disobedience court order violation

Anil Kumar Sanwaria & Anr. v. The Speaker, Lok Sabha & Ors.

10 Jul 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:4592
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the 2003 Lok Sabha Secretariat Executive Officer selection process, holding no illegality or mala fide was established and emphasizing limited judicial interference in recruitment matters.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial review selection process Lok Sabha Secretariat departmental examination

The State (NCT of Delhi) v. Kirpal

10 Jul 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:4644-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's Criminal Leave Petition due to a 392-day unexplained delay in filing beyond the statutory limitation period, refusing to condone the delay.

criminal appeal_dismissed condonation of delay limitation period Criminal Leave Petition POCSO Act

M/S RANJIT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. GUJARAT STATE ROAD & BUILDING DEPARTMENT

10 Jul 2023 · Sachin Datta · 2023 SCC OnLine Del 2177

The Delhi High Court held that pre-arbitral conciliation under the contract is directory, not mandatory, and appointed a sole arbitrator despite the respondents' objection of non-exhaustion of conciliation.

other petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 petition Conciliation Mandatory vs directory pre-arbitral steps

Sh. Naresh Jain v. M/S Shaurya Housing Limited & Anr.

10 Jul 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:4704
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a concluded public auction sale by the Official Liquidator cannot be reopened merely due to a higher bid received post-auction, absent fraud or irregularity, and confirmed the highest bidder's sale at Rs.13 crores.

civil appeal_allowed Significant public auction company liquidation Official Liquidator auction sale finality

Debarati Bhunia Chakraborty v. Suman Sankar Bhunia

10 Jul 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:4622

The Delhi High Court held that permission to relocate abroad with minor children requires full disclosure and welfare consideration by the Family Court, allowing the petitioner to file a fresh application for such permission while permitting interim travel alone.

family other Significant relocation abroad minor children custody welfare of children

Handicraft and Handlooms Exports Co of India v. SMC Comtrade Limited

10 Jul 2023 · Jyoti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral interim order directing preservation of Rs. 5 Crores under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, limiting judicial interference to cases of patent illegality or perversity.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 interim relief Section 37 appeal interim measures

Gaurav Bhardwaj v. Bhumika Arora

10 Jul 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:4627-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw US divorce proceedings and upheld Indian court jurisdiction over matrimonial disputes involving Indian citizens married under Hindu law.

family appeal_allowed jurisdiction family court divorce proceedings stay order

Margo Networks Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Railtel Corporation of India Ltd

10 Jul 2023 · Sachin Datta · 2023:DHC:4596
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a restrictive panel of arbitrators consisting solely of former employees of one party is invalid, and appointed an independent three-member arbitral tribunal to ensure impartiality and counterbalancing in arbitration proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Appointment of arbitrators Broad-based panel

Sulphur Mills Limited v. Sulphur Crop Care Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

10 Jul 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:4629

The Delhi High Court decreed the suit against Defendant 1 in terms of a lawful settlement acknowledging the plaintiff's patent rights and payment of royalties, thereby resolving the patent infringement dispute amicably.

civil appeal_allowed settlement patent infringement consent decree Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC