Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
Syngenta Participations AG & Anr. v. GSP Crop Science Private Limited
The Delhi High Court disposed of the civil suit filed by Syngenta Participations AG as withdrawn on the plaintiffs' request.
M/S OM SHIVA TRADERS PVT. LTD. v. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 13(4)
The Delhi High Court set aside the ITAT's non-speaking order reversing the CIT(A)'s reasoned decision under Section 68 and remanded the matter for a fresh hearing with proper reasons.
Parmeshwari Devi v. Ram Kishan & Ors.
The High Court allowed the petition under Article 227, set aside the Trial Court's dismissal of the amendment application, held that objections on non-inclusion of properties and non-joinder raised at final arguments are untenable, and directed expeditious disposal of the partition suit.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -6 v. Minda SM Technocast Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision deleting an addition to income based on incorrect retrospective application of amended share valuation rules for AY 2014-15.
MS Greentech Environ Management Pvt Ltd v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a penalty under a municipal contract, holding that contractual disputes with disputed facts require civil adjudication and are not amenable to writ jurisdiction.
Deptt. of Health, Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Kamla Mehndiratta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application for condonation of a 691-day delay in restoring a dismissed writ petition, holding that government departments must demonstrate sufficient cause and act diligently, and that inordinate delay without plausible explanation cannot be condoned.
Amir Singh Aggarwal v. Arun Goel
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition holding that the allotment of a reduced 60 sq. mtrs. plot to the petitioner was lawful under Central Government directions relaxing the DDA Nazul Land Rules.
Piyush Verma v. Food Corporation of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging cancellation of candidature for non-appearance in document verification, holding that the respondent had afforded sufficient opportunity and was not obligated to communicate through both email and SMS.
Nisha & Anr. v. Vikram Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that territorial jurisdiction in motor accident claims must be determined on the basis of pleadings and documents at the initial stage, disallowing summary dismissal without evidence, and remanded the claim for fresh adjudication.
AB Grain Spirits Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted a 12-month extension for conclusion of arbitration proceedings under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, considering case complexity and pandemic delays with no objection from the respondent.
SH GANESH v. SH FARJANDA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court modified the monthly release of compensation from Rs.30,000/- to Rs.1,00,000/- per month for a permanently disabled motor accident victim to prevent the compensation from becoming illusory due to prolonged disbursement.
Pramod Kumar Singh v. Subodh Kumar Khandelwal
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to set aside the striking off of defence for procedural non-compliance upon payment of costs and restoration of the defence to decide the suit on merits.
Bharatiya Pratiraksha Mazdoor Sangh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the Government's decision to corporatize the Ordnance Factory Board, ruling that policy decisions in national interest are beyond judicial interference absent arbitrariness or illegality.
Blackberry India Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise and CGST Division, Malaviya Nagar, New Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed refund of unutilised Cenvat Credit is payable from the date after three months from the original refund application date, not from subsequent follow-up letters or appellate orders.
Dinesh Jain v. Dhanesh Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw trademark appeals with liberty to challenge rectification under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Foodlink F and B Holdings India Private Limited v. Wow Momo Foods Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction against the defendant's use of "WOW CHINA BISTRO" holding it deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered trademark "CHINA BISTRO", affirming that disclaimers on individual words do not bar infringement claims on the composite mark.
Mohammad Ali v. Manisha Dhawan
The High Court allowed the petition to set aside the trial court's order refusing to take the belated written statement on record, subject to costs and compliance with directions, to ensure fair trial and expeditious disposal.
Sh. Parmod Kumar Jain v. Mr. Satish Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit challenging ownership of property purchased in the wife's name but paid by the husband is maintainable and cannot be summarily dismissed on grounds of benami transaction or limitation without trial.
Sudhir Kr. Gupta & Anr. v. Rahul Gupta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Company Law Board’s order on valuation and corporate changes is not binding on the civil court where the land sale dispute is pending, and dismissed the appeal accordingly.
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited & Anr. v. The Controller of Patents & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a revocation petition under Section 64 of the Patents Act is not a 'suit' under Section 10 CPC and refused to stay revocation proceedings pending a patent infringement suit.