Delhi High Court

30,483 judgments

Year:

Rakesh v. Babita Tyagi

04 Aug 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:5517
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing the written statement in a partition suit at an early stage, emphasizing adjudication on merits over technicalities, subject to costs and conditions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay written statement partition suit Article 227 Constitution of India

Ambica Pharmacy v. Surma Kanwal Nain Pharmacy

04 Aug 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:5532

The High Court of Delhi dismissed the commercial intellectual property petition for default due to the petitioner’s failure to appear and prosecute the case.

civil petition_dismissed dismissal for default non-prosecution withdrawal of petition appearance

Ajay Singh v. Roop Singh & Anr.

04 Aug 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:5559
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a written statement after ex-parte proceedings on payment of costs, emphasizing adjudication on merits over procedural defaults.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex-parte proceedings written statement compensatory costs Order 47 Rule 1 CPC

Vipin v. The State

04 Aug 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:5476

Bail was granted to the husband accused under Sections 498A and 304B IPC due to lack of specific dowry demand allegations and absence of alternate charges, despite the presumption under Section 113B Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC

V. R. Holdings v. Hero Investocorp Limited & Anr.

04 Aug 2023 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma · 2023:DHC:5458-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a Letters Patent Appeal is maintainable against orders under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act despite Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act restricting appeals to orders passed in exercise of ordinary original civil jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Letters Patent Appeal Trade Marks Act Section 57 Commercial Courts Act Section 13 Commercial Division jurisdiction

Delhi Development Authority v. Sanjay Kumar

04 Aug 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:5438-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of disciplinary penalty against a DDA Senior Law Officer who acted under superior's direction without substantive evidence of misconduct.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings Delhi Development Authority Senior Law Officer lease deed

Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

04 Aug 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:5466-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Circulars mandating transparent online admissions under Management Quota seats with modifications allowing offline applications, emphasizing statutory authority and fundamental rights balance.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Management Quota Delhi Professional Colleges Act 2007 Article 19(1)(g) Admission procedure

Syngenta Participations AG & Anr. v. GSP Crop Science Private Limited

04 Aug 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:5535

The Delhi High Court disposed of the civil suit filed by Syngenta Participations AG as withdrawn on the plaintiffs' request.

civil other withdrawal of suit disposal of suit plaintiff's right civil procedure

M/S OM SHIVA TRADERS PVT. LTD. v. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 13(4)

04 Aug 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:5973-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the ITAT's non-speaking order reversing the CIT(A)'s reasoned decision under Section 68 and remanded the matter for a fresh hearing with proper reasons.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Section 68 triple test non-speaking order

Parmeshwari Devi v. Ram Kishan & Ors.

04 Aug 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:5682

The High Court allowed the petition under Article 227, set aside the Trial Court's dismissal of the amendment application, held that objections on non-inclusion of properties and non-joinder raised at final arguments are untenable, and directed expeditious disposal of the partition suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India Order VI Rule 17 CPC Order I Rule 10 CPC Section 151 CPC

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -6 v. Minda SM Technocast Pvt. Ltd.

04 Aug 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:5998-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision deleting an addition to income based on incorrect retrospective application of amended share valuation rules for AY 2014-15.

tax appeal_dismissed Rule 11UA Income Tax Rules 1962 fair market value unquoted shares valuation

MS Greentech Environ Management Pvt Ltd v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

04 Aug 2023 · Prateek Jalan · 2023:DHC:5573

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a penalty under a municipal contract, holding that contractual disputes with disputed facts require civil adjudication and are not amenable to writ jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction contractual dispute Article 226 penalty

Deptt. of Health, Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Kamla Mehndiratta & Ors.

04 Aug 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:5598

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application for condonation of a 691-day delay in restoring a dismissed writ petition, holding that government departments must demonstrate sufficient cause and act diligently, and that inordinate delay without plausible explanation cannot be condoned.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act 1963 government department liability sufficient cause

Amir Singh Aggarwal v. Arun Goel

04 Aug 2023 · Jasmeet Singh · 2023:DHC:5645

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition holding that the allotment of a reduced 60 sq. mtrs. plot to the petitioner was lawful under Central Government directions relaxing the DDA Nazul Land Rules.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant DDA Nazul Land Rules 1981 Rule 18 Rule 45 Central Government directions

Piyush Verma v. Food Corporation of India & Ors.

04 Aug 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:5819

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging cancellation of candidature for non-appearance in document verification, holding that the respondent had afforded sufficient opportunity and was not obligated to communicate through both email and SMS.

administrative petition_dismissed document verification cancellation of candidature recruitment process communication by email and SMS

Nisha & Anr. v. Vikram Singh & Anr.

03 Aug 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:5491

The Delhi High Court held that territorial jurisdiction in motor accident claims must be determined on the basis of pleadings and documents at the initial stage, disallowing summary dismissal without evidence, and remanded the claim for fresh adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction motor accident claim Section 166(2) Motor Vehicles Act Order VII Rule 10 CPC

AB Grain Spirits Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Government of NCT of Delhi

03 Aug 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:5557

The Delhi High Court granted a 12-month extension for conclusion of arbitration proceedings under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, considering case complexity and pandemic delays with no objection from the respondent.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A extension of time arbitration proceedings

SH GANESH v. SH FARJANDA & ORS.

03 Aug 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:5489

The Delhi High Court modified the monthly release of compensation from Rs.30,000/- to Rs.1,00,000/- per month for a permanently disabled motor accident victim to prevent the compensation from becoming illusory due to prolonged disbursement.

civil petition_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation release fixed deposit receipts monthly installment

Pramod Kumar Singh v. Subodh Kumar Khandelwal

03 Aug 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:5504

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to set aside the striking off of defence for procedural non-compliance upon payment of costs and restoration of the defence to decide the suit on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Order 11 Rule 4(2) CPC affidavit of admission and denial of documents striking off defence condonation of delay

Bharatiya Pratiraksha Mazdoor Sangh v. Union of India

03 Aug 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Sanjeev Narula · 2023:DHC:5495-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Government's decision to corporatize the Ordnance Factory Board, ruling that policy decisions in national interest are beyond judicial interference absent arbitrariness or illegality.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Ordnance Factory Board Corporatization Article 14 Policy decision