Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 7635/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Decision delivered on: 02.08.2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Decision delivered on: 02.08.2023
W.P.(C) 7635/2023
SARITA SAGAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms Mitika Choudhary, Adv.
SARITA SAGAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms Mitika Choudhary, Adv.
VERSUS
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 70 1 & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Aseem Chawla, Sr Standing Counsel with Ms Pratishtha
Choudhary and Mr Aditya Gupta, Advs. Mr Ashish Batra, Sr. Panel Counsel for Respondent/U.O.I.
Through: Mr Aseem Chawla, Sr Standing Counsel with Ms Pratishtha
Choudhary and Mr Aditya Gupta, Advs. Mr Ashish Batra, Sr. Panel Counsel for Respondent/U.O.I.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):
CM No.39133/2023
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):
CM No.39133/2023
JUDGMENT
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM No. 39132/2023
2. This is an application filed seeking recall of order dated 30.05.2023.
3. A perusal of the order would show that the petitioner’s counsel, i.e., Ms Mitika Choudhary, had made a submission before the Court that she has instruction to withdraw the writ petition, as the assessment order has been W.P.(C) 7635/2023 passed.
4. Since liberty was sought to take recourse to an appropriate remedy as per law, leeway in that behalf was granted.
5. It is not disputed by Ms Choudhary that since the order dated 30.05.2023 being passed, a statutory appeal has been preferred.
6. In our view, this application is completely without merit.
7. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.