Delhi High Court

32,551 judgments

Year:

Sultan Ansari v. DRI

04 Sep 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:6359
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a manager-cum-chemist accused of conspiracy and falsification of records in illegal trade of controlled and psychotropic substances, holding that the statutory embargo under Section 37 of the NDPS Act bars bail absent reasonable grounds to believe innocence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act bail under NDPS Act commercial quantity

Quari Mohammed Hanif Samadi v. The State

04 Sep 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:6333

The Delhi High Court granted bail to a foreign national accused of trafficking commercial quantity heroin after he served more than half the minimum sentence, emphasizing the right to liberty and imposing strict bail conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail NDPS Act commercial quantity foreign national

Sohrab v. State GNCT of Delhi

04 Sep 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:6329

The Delhi High Court allowed parole to a life-convict prisoner to file a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, holding that parole cannot be denied solely on the basis of the nature of offence without considering special circumstances and the prisoner’s right to legal remedies.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant parole prisoner rights access to legal remedies special leave petition

Mohd Hasan @Nanhe v. State

04 Sep 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:6331

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the refusal to recall a witness under Section 311 Cr.P.C., holding that such interlocutory orders are not revisable and recalling witnesses after long delay without bona fide reasons is impermissible.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 311 Cr.P.C. interlocutory order revision petition maintainability recall of witness

National Insurance Co. Ltd v. Sh. Subhash & Ors.

04 Sep 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:6330

The Delhi High Court upheld compensation awarded to siblings of a deceased in a motor vehicle accident, endorsing a liberal interpretation of 'legal representative' under the Motor Vehicles Act to include brothers and sisters even without strict proof of dependency.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act compensation loss of consortium legal representative

Dinesh v. State of NCT of Delhi

04 Sep 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:6395

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Arms Act, 1959, holding that mere custody without conscious possession of ammunition does not constitute an offence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant conscious possession Arms Act 1959 Section 30 Arms Act quashing of FIR

Monster Energy Company v. Vineet Deshwal Trading as Radha Krishna Enterprises

04 Sep 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:6403

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions against the defendant for trademark infringement and passing off of the 'MONSTER' mark, ordered delivery of seized goods, and imposed punitive costs for dishonest conduct.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Permanent injunction Trade Marks Act, 1999

Harsh Vardhan v. Alna Biotech Pvt Limited & Anr.

04 Sep 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:6397

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act directing cancellation of the GLAMROOT trademark registration by the Registrar of Trademarks upon joint request of the parties.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 57 trademark cancellation rectification of trademark register

Sanjeev Batra and Another v. Simranjeet Kaur and Another

04 Sep 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:6355

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging summoning orders under the DV Act, holding that prima facie allegations and DNA evidence justified trial and disputed facts must be decided by the trial court.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12 DV Act summoning order domestic violence

Vishwa Pratap @ Bopy v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

04 Sep 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:6345
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that mere change of counsel does not justify recalling witnesses for further cross-examination in POCSO cases, balancing the accused's fair trial rights with the victim's protection from repeated trauma.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 311 Cr.P.C. recall of witnesses change of counsel POCSO Act

Ashok Garg v. State of NCT Delhi

04 Sep 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:6351

The Delhi High Court made absolute the interim anticipatory bail of the petitioner in a case under Sections 323 and 341 IPC, subject to conditions ensuring cooperation and non-interference with the victim.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail interim bail cooperation with investigation conditions of bail

State v. Shamshad

04 Sep 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:6326-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of the accused in a kidnapping and rape case due to failure to prove the prosecutrix's minority and absence of evidence of non-consensual intercourse.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant kidnapping rape minor prosecutrix

Shakti Datt Sharma & Ors. v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Ors.

04 Sep 2023 · Mini Pushkarna · 2023:DHC:6431

Delhi High Court dismissed writ petition seeking Equated Teaching Designation of Professor, holding petitioners lacked requisite experience in a qualifying non-teaching district hospital as per statutory regulations.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Equated Teaching Designation Minimum Qualifications For Teachers in Medical Institutions Regulations, 1998 Non-teaching district hospital Teaching hospital experience

W R GRACE AND CO CONN v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS

04 Sep 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:6371

The Delhi High Court remanded a patent application for fresh examination after the appellant restricted claims to the method of preparation, holding that product claims were rightly rejected but method claims merit reconsideration.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant patent application inventive step therapeutic efficacy Section 3(d)

Ashish Gupta v. State & Anr.

04 Sep 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:6360

The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning and charge framing orders against the petitioner, dismissing his plea to quash the complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for lack of a rare case warranting interference.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of complaint prima facie case framing of charges

PHARMACYCLICS LLC & ANR v. LUCIUS PHARMACEUTICALS & ORS

04 Sep 2023 · C. HARI SHANKAR · 2023:DHC:6401

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and summary judgment in favor of the patent holder against defendants infringing the patent for Ibrutinib, awarding costs and dismissing defenses denying involvement.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Patent infringement Ibrutinib Indian Patent No. 262968 Permanent injunction

Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB v. Union of India

04 Sep 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:6396

The Delhi High Court set aside a patent rejection order lacking proper reasoning and remanded the application for fresh examination with an opportunity of hearing.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant patent application patent rejection reasoned order opportunity of hearing

M/S COBRA INSTALACIONES Y SERVICIOS, S.A & M/S SHYAM INDUS POWER SOLUTION PVT. LTD. v. HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD.

04 Sep 2023 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2023:DHC:6367
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that deposit of an arbitral award amount in court with notice to the decree holder discharges the judgment debtor’s liability to pay interest from the date of deposit, and the decree holder cannot claim interest for the period between deposit and withdrawal.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Order XXI Rule 1 CPC Deposit of award amount Interest liability

Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited v. Fast Cure Pharma and Anr.

04 Sep 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:6324

The Delhi High Court held that trademark rectification petitions under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, can be filed before any High Court where the petitioner suffers the dynamic effect of the registration, not only before the High Court having jurisdiction over the Registry office where the mark was registered.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 47 Section 57 Section 124

K.V. Brahmaji Rao v. Union of India and Others

04 Sep 2023 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2023:DHC:6379

Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging prosecution sanction in PNB LoU fraud case for lack of territorial jurisdiction, upholding the sanction as validly granted after due application of mind.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sanction for prosecution Prevention of Corruption Act section 197 CrPC territorial jurisdiction