Delhi High Court

63,783 judgments

Year:

Neelam v. Parmod Kumar Yadav

20 Sep 2023 · Navin Chawla

The High Court held that negligence was attributable to a broken-down vehicle parked without warning signals, apportioned contributory negligence to the deceased, and remanded the claim for fresh compensation determination under Section 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

civil remanded Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163A Section 166 Section 168

Deepak Kapoor & Ors. v. State GNCT & Anr.

20 Sep 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:7065

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Ajay Kumar v. Municipal Corporation and Others

20 Sep 2023 · Siddharth Mridul; Anish Dayal · 2023:DHC:6995-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to allow the petitioner to vend peacefully within his designated zone strictly in accordance with his Certificate of Vending under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.

administrative appeal_allowed Street Vendors Act 2014 Certificate of Vending Town Vending Committee Municipal Corporation of Delhi

State v. Arjun Ekka & Anr.

20 Sep 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:7200-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder case due to failure of prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and unreliable extra-judicial confession.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence extra-judicial confession benefit of doubt recovery of articles

Karan Kapoor v. Madhuri Kumar

20 Sep 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:6900

The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of a landlord-tenant suit involving disputed Agreements to Sell to be heard alongside the petitioner’s suit, emphasizing the need for full trial on ownership and tenancy issues rather than summary dismissal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant transfer of suit Agreement to Sell landlord-tenant dispute Order XII Rule 6 CPC

Rakhi Verma v. State

20 Sep 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:7066

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial offence FIR and related proceedings under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC based on the parties' amicable settlement and reconciliation, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Anuradha Jain v. Rajesh Kumar Jain

20 Sep 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:7291-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's grant of divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion, emphasizing that false criminal complaints and prolonged separation constitute mental cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_dismissed Significant cruelty desertion divorce Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Sonia Singh v. Harpal Singh

20 Sep 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:7977-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld divorce granted on the ground of cruelty where the wife filed false criminal complaints and abandoned the matrimonial home without justifiable cause shortly after marriage.

family appeal_dismissed Significant cruelty divorce Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 false criminal complaints

State NCT of Delhi v. Pawan Ram

20 Sep 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:6816-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the State's petition for leave to appeal against the acquittal of an accused in a sexual assault case involving a minor, emphasizing proper appreciation of age evidence and forensic reports.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant minor age determination sexual assault POCSO Act DNA evidence

M/S Ajit Motors v. Nem Singh

20 Sep 2023 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023:DHC:7009
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's order of illegal retrenchment, directing reinstatement with back wages, and refused to interfere under its supervisory jurisdiction absent jurisdictional error.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant illegal retrenchment Section 25F Industrial Disputes Act reinstatement back wages

Atul Tyagi & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi & Anr.

20 Sep 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:7404

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Prakash Chand v. State

20 Sep 2023 · Amit Bansal · 2023:DHC:6973

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of the closure report, direction to seek sanction, and framing of charges against the petitioner under the Prevention of Corruption Act, emphasizing that at the charge framing stage, only a prima facie case is required.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant closure report sanction for prosecution Prevention of Corruption Act charge framing

Karan alias Raj Karan alias Bittoo v. State

19 Sep 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:6791

The Delhi High Court granted interim bail for 10 days on humanitarian grounds of the petitioner’s mother’s serious illness, imposing conditions to prevent misuse of bail.

criminal appeal_allowed interim bail humanitarian grounds serious illness degenerative disc disease

State v. Ram Kishan

19 Sep 2023 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2023:DHC:7767

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rash and negligent driving case, holding that prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rash and negligent driving section 279 IPC section 338 IPC burden of proof

Unitech Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-IX, New Delhi & Ors.

19 Sep 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:7562-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the Income Tax Settlement Commission’s rejection of the petitioner’s application and remanded the matter for re-examination on merits, including transfer pricing and cessation of business issues.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Settlement Commission transfer pricing Section 245D(2C) Section 245C(1)(ia)(B)(ii)

Gold Croft Properties Pvt Ltd v. Directorate of Enforcement

19 Sep 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:6887-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a single-member Adjudicating Authority bench under the PMLA and dismissed the writ petition for lack of maintainability due to availability of an alternative remedy.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Adjudicating Authority Single-member bench Provisional Attachment Order

Basic Clothing Private Limited v. ITO, Ward 4 (1), Delhi & Ors.

19 Sep 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:7561-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices and orders reopening assessment on the same issues already adjudicated, reaffirming that reassessment cannot be based on a change of opinion under the amended Income Tax Act provisions.

tax petition_allowed Significant reassessment change of opinion Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148

Dilip Maity & Ors. v. Sh. Shaukat Ali & Ors.

19 Sep 2023 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023:DHC:7080

The Delhi High Court upheld an ex-parte compensation award under the Employees Compensation Act, holding the petitioners jointly and severally liable as principal employers and affirming the presumption of service of summons sent by speed post.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Employees Compensation Act, 1923 ex-parte award presumption of service principal employer liability

Union of India and Anr. v. Bishan Dass

19 Sep 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:6782-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order granting notional promotion with consequential benefits to a retired employee who was in the zone of consideration at the time of vacancy, rejecting the Union of India's challenge based on service regulations.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant notional promotion retired employee Departmental Promotion Committee Central Administrative Tribunal

Pratibha v. Union of India & Anr.

19 Sep 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:7208
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful termination of a probationary Development Officer for failure to meet performance targets, rejecting claims of discrimination and COVID-19 related relief.

labor petition_dismissed Significant probationary employee termination during probation performance targets COVID-19 relaxation