Delhi High Court

93,877 judgments

Year:

Rishikesh Meena v. Union of India

19 Oct 2023 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain · 2023:DHC:7710-DB

The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of the petitioner's pending representations against orders stopping training allowance and recovery, without quashing the impugned orders.

administrative other training allowance quashing order administrative representation recovery order

Rashmi Sharma v. Deepak Sharma

19 Oct 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:7680-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's decree dissolving marriage on grounds of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, emphasizing the flexible nature of mental cruelty and rejecting the appellant's challenge.

family appeal_dismissed Significant cruelty divorce Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 mental cruelty

INTER IKEA SYSTEMS BV v. QUESS CORP LIMITED

19 Oct 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:7702

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's partial rejection of the Defendant's belated document production application in a trademark suit, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines and preventing trial delays.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VIII Rule 1A CPC production of documents leave of court commercial suit

Anil Kumar Mokharia v. Union of India and Others

19 Oct 2023 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain · 2023:DHC:7704-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the medical unfitness declaration based on diminished visual acuity and LASIK surgery disqualification under BSF standards.

administrative petition_dismissed Medical Examination Report Visual Acuity LASIK Surgery BSF Medical Standards

Aidem Ventures Pvt Ltd v. B.A.G Glamour Pvt Ltd

19 Oct 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:7721

The Delhi High Court ordered transfer of nascent winding up petitions pending before it to the NCLT under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, following Supreme Court precedent.

corporate other Significant winding up petition Companies Act 2013 Section 434 transfer to NCLT

Jamahir @ Jawahar Paswan v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

19 Oct 2023 · Amit Bansal
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that convicts of murder after rape may be granted parole on showing special circumstances such as filing an SLP, emphasizing that seriousness of offence alone cannot bar parole.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant parole heinous offence murder after rape Delhi Prisons Rules 2018

Dr. Neena Raizada v. Medical Council of India

19 Oct 2023 · Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:7792

The Delhi High Court upheld the Medical Council of India's authority to issue warnings as valid disciplinary action for professional misconduct under its regulations, dismissing the petition challenging such warning.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Indian Medical Council Regulations 2002 professional misconduct disciplinary action Regulation 7.[7]

Vinay Jaikumar v. State

19 Oct 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:7777

The Delhi High Court confirmed interim protection and granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a rape case, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and imposing conditions to prevent misuse.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC Section 376 IPC interim protection

Mohd. Arman v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

19 Oct 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:7769-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking production of a missing person, holding that the police have undertaken all reasonable efforts to trace him and the investigation is ongoing.

criminal petition_dismissed missing person police investigation Section 365 IPC FIR registration

Ashish Mittal v. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.

19 Oct 2023 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2023:DHC:7656

The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition to quash an ECIR based on summons under section 50 PMLA is premature and not maintainable when the petitioner is not named as an accused, and anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C. remains the appropriate remedy.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section 50 PMLA Section 19 PMLA Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Revalsys Technologies India Private Limited v. Land Ports Authority of India

19 Oct 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Sanjeev Narula · 2023:DHC:7948-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking acceptance of a late tender bid, holding that no technical glitches on the e-tender portal prevented timely submission and emphasizing limited judicial interference in tender processes.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender process technical glitch e-tendering portal Government E-Marketplace

Anuradha Bakshi v. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Central

19 Oct 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Sanjeev Narula · 2023:DHC:7814-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the last panchnama dated 29th April 2021 marked the conclusion of search, rendering the assessment order dated 31st March 2023 within limitation under Section 153B, and dismissed the petition challenging the revisional notice under Section 263.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 132 search and seizure Section 153A assessment Section 153B limitation

Shiv Prasad v. Manju

19 Oct 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:7672-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the delayed appeal against a maintenance order and stayed execution of Non-Bailable Warrants pending the appellant's appearance in family court.

family appeal_dismissed maintenance pendente lite Hindu Marriage Act Section 24 condonation of delay Non-Bailable Warrants

Priya Jain v. Usha Jain

19 Oct 2023 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain · 2023:DHC:7703-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of appeals by directing production and admission of specified balance sheets in a probate suit, with parties agreeing to no further evidence or applications to ensure expeditious disposal.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural Order XI Rule 12 CPC Order XVI Rule 1 CPC Probate Petition production of documents

Bhagwat Singh v. Delhi Transport Corporation

19 Oct 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:7681-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Transport Corporation to dispose of the petitioner's pending departmental appeal within six weeks, emphasizing timely compliance with Tribunal orders and allowing further legal remedies if aggrieved.

administrative appeal_allowed departmental appeal Delhi Transport Corporation Central Administrative Tribunal non-compliance

Sh. Jai Pal v. Central Administrative Tribunal

19 Oct 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:7679-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition to set aside the CAT's dismissal of the review petition and directed reconsideration in light of similarly placed employees' exoneration following a fresh inquiry.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Central Administrative Tribunal Review Petition Disciplinary Authority Inquiry Officer Report

Smt. Tersi & Ors. v. Bharti Axa General Life Insurance Co. Ltd & Ors.

19 Oct 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:7708

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone the delay, holding that the Tribunal lacked territorial jurisdiction and the appeal was barred by limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed condonation of delay territorial jurisdiction motor accident claim limitation

Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Naushad Naz

19 Oct 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:7759

The Delhi High Court held that the claimants proved rash and negligent driving causing death, set aside the no-fault compensation award, and remanded the matter for proper determination of compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163A Section 166 motor accident claim

Sh. A.K. Buddhist v. Union of India

19 Oct 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:7770-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order and directed the Union of India to grant ad-hoc and regular promotions to eligible junior wireless officers within one week.

administrative appeal_allowed ad-hoc promotion regular promotion Central Administrative Tribunal promotion eligibility

Chandeep Singh S Awhney v. Ravinder Kumar Ahuja & Ors.

19 Oct 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:7706

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an impleadment application, holding that the petitioner was neither a necessary nor proper party to a suit for mandatory injunction concerning property possession.

civil petition_dismissed Significant impleadment Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC necessary party proper party