Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
Subhra Kabasi v. Ranjeet
The Delhi High Court upheld the landlord's decree for possession against the tenant, holding that a tenant cannot deny the landlord's title during tenancy under Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act, and dismissed the second appeal for lack of substantial question of law.
GAIL INDIA LTD v. UCO BANK & ANR
The Delhi High Court rejected GAIL India's suit against UCO Bank for recovery under a performance bank guarantee, holding that the invocation letter was defective and did not comply with the guarantee's terms, thus no cause of action arose.
Rajeev Gupta v. Hazarilal Gupta
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of an application to set aside an ex-parte decree, holding that summons service by affixation was valid and the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 cannot be used to reappreciate evidence.
Babu Lal and Anr. v. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a unilateral appointment of an arbitrator without following Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, renders the arbitral award a nullity and set aside the award accordingly.
Dalip Kumar Saluja & Anr. v. Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of petitioners' challenge to possession proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, holding that an unregistered Agreement to Sell executed after mortgage creation does not confer title against the secured lender.
Chhotu Ram v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court declared the petitioner medically fit following re-examination and directed the Staff Selection Commission to proceed with his recruitment as Sub Inspector.
Ved Kumari Batra v. Jugal Batra & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging issue framing and held an interlocutory application for possession infructuous after the tenant vacated, leaving pending applications for trial court's decision.
Sumit v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the review petition and declared the petitioner medically fit for recruitment as Sub Inspector based on fresh unaided vision medical evidence, directing expeditious recruitment.
Nem Singh & Anr. v. Usha
The Delhi High Court held that for uninsured offending vehicles, the prescribed remedy is sale by public auction and deposit of proceeds with the Claims Tribunal, setting aside the Tribunal's order demanding a security deposit.
Union of India & Anr. v. Bharat Serums and Vaccines Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld that Paragraph 20 of the 2013 Drugs Price Control Order permits a 10% annual MRP increase for non-scheduled drugs with prescribed rollback and penalty consequences for overcharging, rejecting the Union's broader price control interpretation.
Sonia v. United India Insurance Company Ltd
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including all family-beneficial allowances in deceased's income, granting 50% future prospects, awarding loss of consortium to each claimant, and upholding 9% interest.
U P State Road Transport Corporation v. Jitender Kumar Rana
Delhi High Court upheld UPSRTC's liability for rash and negligent driving causing grievous injury to passenger, affirmed 85% disability, allowed future prospects addition, and upheld compensation for prosthetic limb and related expenses with modifications.
Nitika Talwar v. Dinesh Talwar
The High Court held that impleading a new party in a divorce petition requires prior amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and set aside the Family Court's order allowing impleadment under Order I Rule 10 CPC without such amendment.
Anupama Khanna v. Indrajit Seth
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against the School Chairman for non-compliance of Court and Directorate orders on sexual harassment allegations, holding no wilful disobedience and noting the contemnors' death and retirement.
Amar Holidays Pvt. Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the tender conditions for CPV services in UAE, holding that the eligibility criteria and tender terms were not arbitrary and courts should exercise restraint in interfering with tender processes.
Environics Trust v. The Dept Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 149(1) of the Income Tax Act for escaped income exceeding INR 50 lakh, dismissing the petitioner’s writ challenge for lack of tangible material and suppression of facts.
M/S Danial Transport Company v. Land Ports Authority of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the award of a cargo handling contract, holding that judicial interference in tender decisions is limited to cases of arbitrariness or mala fide, and the tendering authority’s evaluation and relaxation of technical criteria were lawful.
Vijay Kumar Pandey v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed a PIL directing Special Olympics Bharat to comply strictly with the National Sports Development Code 2011 regarding athlete selection and office-bearer appointments, resolving alleged irregularities in its functioning.
Raghunath Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Anant Raj Limited
The Delhi High Court restored an arbitral award upholding the appellant's valid termination of a development agreement, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and the arbitrator's commercial interpretation of contract terms.
Air India Limited v. All India Aircraft Engineers Association
The Delhi High Court upheld arbitral awards directing Air India to pay wage arrears from 1997 to 2006 to employees, rejecting the petitioner's challenge based on presidential directives and affirming the tribunal's jurisdiction and interest award.