Delhi High Court
64,086 judgments
A. Priya Chandela v. Shashi Talwar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's order directing piecemeal amendment of an election petition, holding that jurisdictional bars must be decided after evidence and that partial rejection under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC is impermissible.
Bennett Coleman and Company Limited v. E Entertainment Television LLC and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that Order XI Rule 1(10) CPC applies to rectification petitions under the Trade Marks Act, allowing Respondent 1 to place a YouTube video on record after pleadings to ensure substantial justice.
Radheyshyam Mauriya v. SBI General Insurance Co Ltd & Ors.
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including future prospects of income and correcting multiplier based on actual age, while upholding disability assessment and attendant charges.
SUPREME COURT BAR CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD & ANR. v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that the MCD's minimum five-meter width requirement for gates applies only to main access points, allowing gates in narrower internal lanes subject to police recommendation, and directed reconsideration of the petitioners' application accordingly.
Faiyaz @ Payazi v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a man for aggravated penetrative sexual assault of a 5-year-old child based on credible victim testimony and presumption of guilt under POCSO, dismissing the appeal.
Ram Sahay Meena Kalky & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions under Section 482 CrPC challenging framing of charges under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, holding that the petitioners failed to show illegality in concurrent findings and that a panchayat divorce decree does not negate the validity of marriage for criminal proceedings.
Dipak Bhattacharyya v. National Board of Accreditation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging non-empanelment with NBA, holding that no error apparent on record justified review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.
Invent Assets Securitization and Reconstruction Private Limited v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 21 of the RDB Act, a pre-deposit for an appeal must be 50% of the debt amount adjudicated against the appellant specifically, not the total debt, and directed the DRAT to consider the petitioner’s appeal on this basis.
Citibank N.A. & Anr. v. Kuldeep Singh Dabas
The Delhi High Court disposed of cross appeals by enforcing a mutually agreed Settlement Agreement resolving all disputes between Citibank N.A. (now Axis Bank Limited) and Kuldeep Singh Dabas.
Shabana Praveen v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking production of a missing minor, directing police to continue investigation and file quarterly status reports, finding that adequate search efforts were underway.
Umesh Kumar v. The N.C.T/Govt. of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the habeas corpus petition regarding a missing wife directing continued police investigation with quarterly status reports to the magistrate.
Shivdevi v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking production of a missing girl, directing continued police investigation with periodic status reports but declined to issue a Habeas Corpus order due to lack of conclusive evidence.
Sumangli Gupta v. L.R. Gupta, HUF & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a partition suit with liberty to pursue claims for refund of interest-free security and property tax outside the suit, holding that claims not included in a settlement cannot be agitated in the same suit.
Reindodegracia Consultant Pvt Ltd v. Diasys Diagnostics India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a defendant's application seeking return of plaint for non-compliance with mandatory pre-institution mediation, holding that suits filed before 20.08.2022 with an application for urgent interim relief are exempt from Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Narender Kumar & Anr v. Rameshwar Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed modification of an arbitral award in terms of a lawful family settlement executed by the parties and permitted substitution of legal heirs following the respondent's death.
Surinder Kaur v. Ashok Kumar Bhakri
The Delhi High Court directed the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal to expeditiously dispose of a pending appeal, emphasizing the petitioner's age and undertaking to avoid unnecessary adjournments.
Shri Colonizers and Developers Pvt. Ltd v. Abha Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for challenging an arbitral award begins only upon delivery of the signed award copy to the party itself, not merely to its counsel or in allied proceedings.
Bhawna Kalra & Ors. v. Swati Choudhary
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the dismissal of an application to bring on record the landlord's son's employment status in an eviction proceeding, holding no interference was warranted at the interlocutory stage.
Tejinder Khosla & Anr v. Sukhwant Kaur & Anr
The Delhi High Court granted a preliminary decree of partition only for admitted movable assets, rejecting partition of the disputed terrace pending trial to determine the Will's intent and ownership.
Chandra Prakash Tiwari & Anr. v. M S Padmini Technologies Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging denial of reinstatement and upheld enhanced compensation where the employer company had closed down and the appeal was grossly delayed without sufficient cause.