Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
D D Joshi v. The Registrar Cooperative Societies and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that once cooperative society elections commence, only the Returning Officer can decide candidate eligibility, directing the RCS to appoint a new Returning Officer to conduct the November 19, 2023 elections and consider disqualification objections independently.
Anjali Vaid v. Adarsh World School
The Delhi High Court directed private unaided recognized schools to implement the 7th CPC recommendations fully and pay arrears with interest, holding non-compliance violates constitutional and statutory rights of employees.
Aashish Gupta v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that while final answer keys must be published before result declaration for transparency, a one-time post-result re-examination of CUET answer keys was permissible under exceptional circumstances, and dismissed the petitioner’s prayers for further reconsideration and investigation.
Court on Its Own Motion v. Vicky Aggarwal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court discharged respondents from contempt for filing a forged IPAB order due to unintentional conduct and unconditional apology, directing disciplinary action against the responsible advocate.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. Trinity Insurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal and upheld the deletion of supervisory and risk management expenses claimed as business deductions by the insurance broker, emphasizing consistency in tax treatment and the legitimacy of expenses incurred for prospective clients.
Kirti v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited
The High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of the Order 7 Rule 11 CPC application but allowed the belated written statement to be taken on record subject to costs.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. Verizone Communications India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order allowing tax holiday deductions under Section 80IA, holding that expansion of services by the same undertaking post cut-off date does not create a new undertaking.
Pratima Anand v. Urmila Gangwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's order directing piecemeal amendment of an election petition, holding that jurisdictional and maintainability issues must be decided after evidence at final disposal.
LAC R N Bijarniya v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court transferred writ petitions challenging Armed Forces service policy decisions to the Armed Forces Tribunal and allowed a petitioner to withdraw his willingness for re-mustering under extended service conditions.
Kazi Bashir Rahaman v. Raminder Singh
The Delhi High Court held that suits cannot be filed by or against sole proprietorship firms as they lack legal status and set aside trial court orders for failing to grant the defendant an opportunity to reply before allowing amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.
Dr Praveen Singh v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the termination of a contractual Assistant Professor by an incompetent authority, holding that only the Governing Council had power to terminate his service under the hospital’s MOA.
Inspector TD Cyril Mimin Zou v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging height disqualification, holding that selection must be merit-based and vacancies filled by senior candidates in the category.
A. Priya Chandela v. Shashi Talwar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's order directing piecemeal amendment of an election petition, holding that jurisdictional bars must be decided after evidence and that partial rejection under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC is impermissible.
Bennett Coleman and Company Limited v. E Entertainment Television LLC and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that Order XI Rule 1(10) CPC applies to rectification petitions under the Trade Marks Act, allowing Respondent 1 to place a YouTube video on record after pleadings to ensure substantial justice.
Radheyshyam Mauriya v. SBI General Insurance Co Ltd & Ors.
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including future prospects of income and correcting multiplier based on actual age, while upholding disability assessment and attendant charges.
SUPREME COURT BAR CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD & ANR. v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that the MCD's minimum five-meter width requirement for gates applies only to main access points, allowing gates in narrower internal lanes subject to police recommendation, and directed reconsideration of the petitioners' application accordingly.
Faiyaz @ Payazi v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a man for aggravated penetrative sexual assault of a 5-year-old child based on credible victim testimony and presumption of guilt under POCSO, dismissing the appeal.
Ram Sahay Meena Kalky & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions under Section 482 CrPC challenging framing of charges under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, holding that the petitioners failed to show illegality in concurrent findings and that a panchayat divorce decree does not negate the validity of marriage for criminal proceedings.
Dipak Bhattacharyya v. National Board of Accreditation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging non-empanelment with NBA, holding that no error apparent on record justified review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.
Invent Assets Securitization and Reconstruction Private Limited v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 21 of the RDB Act, a pre-deposit for an appeal must be 50% of the debt amount adjudicated against the appellant specifically, not the total debt, and directed the DRAT to consider the petitioner’s appeal on this basis.