Delhi High Court
64,371 judgments
Rahul Shah v. Anubhav Gupta
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Sessions Court order setting aside summons against a partner not shown to be responsible for the firm's business under Section 138 read with Section 141 NI Act.
Manmohan Singh v. Arjun Uppal & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that landlords' bona fide requirement for running a restaurant was genuine and no triable issue was raised by the tenant.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4 v. Klaxon Trading Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision setting aside the PCIT's revisionary order under Section 263, holding that the AO had conducted adequate enquiry into unexplained cash deposits before passing the original assessment order.
Sarina v. Koshlinder Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging visitation rights granted to the respondent, upholding supervised visitation without physical contact to protect the child's welfare amid POCSO allegations.
Dr Harvinder Singh v. Manjeet Kaur Sahni & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the appointment of the maternal grandmother as guardian of a minor in succession proceedings, upholding the trial court's order and allowing the petitioner to contest natural guardianship rights separately.
Trikkur Venkatachalam Radhakrishnan v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an elderly accused in a serious property fraud case, emphasizing that bail is the norm and custody the exception when investigation is complete and there is no risk of evidence tampering.
Kuldeep Singh v. CBI & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a multi-crore EPFO fraud case after considering the completion of investigation, lack of direct evidence, and bail granted to the main accused.
Reliable Tyre Market v. Arjun Uppal & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act, ruling that no permission under the Slums Act is required and bald tenant denials do not raise triable issues.
Raj Singh v. Satya Pal Singh
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to admit additional evidence under Section 391 Cr.P.C., affirming that the petitioner failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and that the application was a belated attempt to delay justice.
Narinder Arora through Legal Heirs v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a legal heir authorized by others through a valid General Power of Attorney can maintain an application under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC without individual affidavits, setting aside the dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution and restoring the appeal.
Sunanda Ayare v. Principle Secretary-Cum-Commissioner, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that removal of vehicles over 15 years old complies with pollution control orders but must follow scrapping procedures; unauthorized removal from private parking without procedure is impermissible, directing release of vehicle if not scrapped.
Beena Gupta v. S. Vipin Singh Chadha
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing the written statement in a commercial suit subject to costs and strict compliance to ensure expeditious trial, setting aside the Trial Court's order dismissing the application.
Naresh Aggarwal & Ors. v. Virender Dhaka & Ors.
The High Court granted a final opportunity to the defendants to cross examine a witness subject to costs and strict conditions, emphasizing timely conduct and expeditious disposal of the suit.
Shri Chintan Bindra v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an assessee cannot be held liable for tax deducted at source but not deposited by the employer, setting aside demands and refund adjustments raised on that basis.
Satish Mohan Agarwal v. Sanjeev Kumar Arora & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and transferred the suit back to itself from the Trial Court, holding that the suit could proceed from the stage of return despite pecuniary jurisdiction issues, subject to payment of proper court fees.
Chand Suraj v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the review petition directing the petitioner to be considered under the general category for recruitment despite EWS certificate timing issues, emphasizing merit-based selection.
Hitesh Chhabra & Anr. v. Sandeep Chhabra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals to direct an interim arrangement for cheque signing in a family partnership dispute under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to maintain business operations pending arbitration.
Burger King Company LLC v. Ranjan Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court declared 'BURGER KING' a well-known trademark, confirmed injunction against defendants' use of the mark, and approved a settlement permitting defendants' use of 'BURGER EMPEROR' marks.
Burger King Company LLC v. Virendra Kumar Gupta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court declared 'BURGER KING' a well-known trademark, confirmed injunction against infringing use by defendants, and approved a settlement restricting defendants from using the mark while permitting use of 'BURGER EMPEROR'.
Avtar Singh Kochar @ Dolly v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused under MCOCA, holding that reasonable grounds must exist to deny bail and that retracted confessions are to be examined at trial, balancing statutory provisions with fundamental rights.