Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rina Sanjiv Kamdar v. Mr. Murlidhar T. Tilwani
The Bombay High Court upheld issuance of process against a HUF member under Section 138/141 NI Act, holding that a HUF is not an "association of individuals" under Section 141 but specific averments of active involvement justify process.
Rongali Naidu v. Indian Coast Guard
The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions of candidates wrongly rejected in Indian Coast Guard recruitment due to minor inadvertent discrepancies, directing their reinstatement subject to verification and completion of formalities.
National Highways Authority of India v. Oriental Pathways (Agra) Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed NHAI's challenge to an arbitral award denying recovery of damages, holding that the award was not patently illegal or perverse and that courts cannot reappreciate evidence under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Rahul Kesarwani v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a petition seeking initiation of perjury proceedings under Section 340 CrPC, holding that mere discrepancies in evidence without deliberate obstruction of justice do not warrant such action.
Kanohar Electricals Limited v. Delhi Transco Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from delay and liquidated damages in a transformer supply contract.
Chief Electoral Officer and Ors. v. Rakesh Chaudhary
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing release of pensionary benefits and leave encashment to a retired government servant, holding that pension cannot be withheld without cognizance by the criminal court and leave encashment cannot be withheld without a specific decision by the competent authority.
D.C. Engineers v. Irrigation and Flood Control Department and Another
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contract disputes after the respondents failed to appoint an arbitrator despite valid requests.
D.C. Engineers v. Irrigation and Flood Control Department and Another
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the petitioner exhausted the contractual dispute resolution mechanism and the respondents failed to respond to arbitration appointment requests.
TATA CAPITAL LIMITED v. M/S NELKO BATTERY AND ELECTRONICS & ANR.
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a loan agreement containing a valid arbitration clause, with parties consenting to arbitration.
M/S CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SURBHI CHAWLA PROPRIETOR OF M/S SURBHI MOTORS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a credit facility agreement, despite non-appearance of respondents.
CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. HARDEEP SINGH & ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following a valid arbitration clause and sufficient service of notice despite respondents' non-appearance.
D.C. Engineers v. Irrigation and Flood Control Department and Another
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a construction contract after the respondents failed to act on the petitioner’s arbitration request.
M. M. Dhonchak v. Union of India
The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn on the appellant's request for leave to withdraw the appeal.
Mr. Puneet Jain; Ms. Kiffi Aggarwal; Mr. Vijay Kumar Dubey v. M/S RKMT BUILDCON PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award as barred by the mandatory three-month limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, refusing to condone delay beyond that period.
CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. JATIN WALIA & ANR
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate disputes arising from a credit facility agreement due to respondents' default and non-response.
Iqbal Singh v. State
Delhi High Court upheld conviction for possession of fake currency under Section 489C IPC but modified sentence to the period already served considering appellant's personal circumstances.
KALAMKARI LIFESTYLE TECH PVT LTD v. MSME FACILIATION COUNCIL, MUMBAI
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 18(4) of the MSMED Act, affirming exclusive jurisdiction at the supplier’s location and dismissing the petitioner’s challenge.
ADM CORPORATION v. REDINGTON INDIA LTD & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that Defendant No. 2 is a necessary and proper party to the suit for recovery of commission and injunctions despite no direct contract, dismissing its application for deletion from the suit.
M/S SAGAR RATNA RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. HILL VIEW HOTEL AND RESTAURANT
The Delhi High Court held that suits seeking urgent interim relief under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 are exempt from mandatory pre-institution mediation under Section 12A, and remanded the suit for merits consideration.
M/S Indra Singh and Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court held that property tax assessments under the ultra vires 2009 NDMC Bye-laws using the Unit Area Method are invalid and set aside the impugned tax demand, directing reassessment consistent with judicial rulings.