Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Tirupati Narashima Murari v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Election Commission has no power to deregister a political party for alleged violation of secularism once registered under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, dismissing the petition challenging AIMIM's registration.
Dr. R.N. Gupta Technical Educational Society v. M/s Intec Capital Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award on a loan dispute, upholding the award's factual findings and interest rate while correcting a minor arithmetical error.
Gillanders Arbuthnot and Co. Limited v. Steel Authority of India Limited
The Delhi High Court restored an arbitral award holding SAIL's claims barred by limitation, ruling that post-termination contractual clauses do not extend limitation and arbitration claims must be filed within the prescribed period.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. M/S Agroha Fincap Ltd.
The High Court held that reassessment under Section 147/148 is valid in absence of jurisdictional satisfaction under Section 153C, allowing the Revenue's appeal and restoring the matter to ITAT.
Daisy Distributors Pvt. Ltd. v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 7(1) New Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that in absence of material handed over from a searched person, the Assessing Officer can validly reopen assessments under Section 148 and is not restricted to proceedings under Section 153C.
Sukhvinder Kumar Bhardwaj v. Smt Vinita
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's suo motu preliminary decree for recovery of possession in a residential tenancy dispute, rejecting the appellant's jurisdictional and procedural objections.
Mohd Amin Deceased through LRs v. Mohd Iqbal Deceased through LRs
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award directing reversion of disputed land and costs, applying Section 14 of the Limitation Act to exclude time spent in execution proceedings, but set aside compensation for demolished constructions due to lack of evidence.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Sh. Satya Pal Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld escalation claims under contract wage revision clauses but set aside damages for loss of profit due to delay for lack of evidence, limiting judicial interference in arbitral awards.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7, Delhi v. Naveen Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that Section 153C of the Income Tax Act applies only if its conditions are met and does not bar reassessment under Section 147 where those conditions are not satisfied.
Vineet Taneja v. Ritu Taneja
The Delhi High Court held that court-appointed counsellors in guardianship cases are not witnesses subject to cross-examination, but parties may cross-examine opposing party witnesses, emphasizing the child's welfare as paramount.
Aktivortho Private Limited v. Dilbagh Singh Sachdeva
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award upholding rent payment obligations under a commercial lease with a lock-in period, emphasizing limited judicial interference in arbitration awards.
Sarabjeet Singh v. Anup Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the plaintiff was not continuously ready and willing to perform the Agreements to Sell and thus not entitled to specific performance.
Harmaninder Kaur v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking allotment of a flat due to automatic cancellation for non-payment and long delay, but directed refund of the deposited amount.
MS Lion Security Guards Services; MS Aakanksha Enterprises; MS Rekart Innovations Pvt Ltd v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a joint venture's technical bid for non-compliance with essential tender conditions relating to Power of Attorney execution and inconsistent designation of lead member.
Navigators Logistics Ltd v. Kashif Qureshi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and that post-employment non-compete clauses are void under Section 27 of the Contract Act.
Pawan Chaudhry & Anr. v. Nimesh Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit involving allegations of forgery cannot be decreed under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC merely due to defendants' failure to file written statements without evidence proving the disputed facts.
M/S M.H. ONE TV NETWORK PVT. LTD. v. M/S MH 7 NEWS AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's trademark registration for 'MH7' due to deceptive similarity with the petitioner's prior registered trademark 'MH1/MH ONE', affirming protection against infringement and unfair competition.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Abhishek
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for Delhi Police Constable recruitment in light of tattoo restrictions, dismissing the petition challenging it.
Apollo Supply Chain Pvt. Ltd v. M/S Jalan Transolutions (India) Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, only the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement is to be examined and appointed a sole arbitrator despite respondent's claim of accord and satisfaction.
VCARE TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD v. MR NIKHIL RAI
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upon confirming the existence of a valid arbitration agreement, leaving all substantive disputes to arbitration.