Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ram Babu Pateriya v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation for Non-Functional Financial Upgradation within ten weeks, holding that an award of displeasure alone cannot bar the grant of such benefits.
Gaurav Dhama v. Director General Central Industrial Security Force
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a minor disciplinary penalty imposed on a CISF constable, holding that admission of charge negated the need for a formal inquiry and no violation of natural justice occurred.
Hanuman Ram & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioners' delayed representation against recovery of alleged inadmissible Training Allowance and stay recovery pending decision.
Brajendra Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging CRPF orders outside its jurisdiction, holding that territorial jurisdiction is determined by cause of action and parties' location, and interim relief cannot exceed main prayers.
Nongthombam Herojit Meitei v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that height relaxation granted at initial recruitment must be extended for promotion through LDCE, and denied arbitrary higher standards violating equality under Article 14.
Union of India v. M/S Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award allowing a contractor's claim for additional payment for water used in curing concrete, directed by the Engineer-in-Charge, holding that such claims are payable when outside the contract scope and not barred by general contract clauses.
Hitabhilashini Sharma v. OJ Kumar Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendants' application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and that issues regarding mutation cancellation and gift deed validity require trial.
Prabhat Kamal Gupta v. Ashok Kamal Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that a post-decree memorandum partitioning property by metes and bounds is not a mere family settlement exempt from stamp duty and must be registered accordingly.
Shri Inderjeet Singh Bindra v. Smt Ramesh Kumari and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint to challenge a 1987 Power of Attorney as forged, holding that such amendment would revive a claim barred by limitation and cause prejudice to defendants.
Shri Ram Gopal Mongia v. Capt Preetinder Singh Thapar & Ors
The High Court held that orders dismissing applications under Order VI Rule 17 CPC affecting rights under the Delhi Rent Control Act are appealable under Section 38, and thus petitions under Article 227 are not maintainable if alternate remedy is available.
Anil Khattar v. Capt Preetinder Singh Thapar & Ors
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging a Rent Controller's order refusing amendment, holding that such orders are appealable under Section 38 of the Delhi Rent Control Act and must be challenged via statutory appeal rather than Article 227 jurisdiction.
Vijay Kumar Setia v. Capt Preetinder Singh Thapar & Ors
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging an order refusing amendment in eviction proceedings, holding that the order is appealable under Section 38 of the Delhi Rent Control Act and the petitioner must exhaust that remedy before invoking Article 227 jurisdiction.
Sandeep Puri v. Sharda Ahuja
The High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition as infructuous after possession was restored to the landlord, affirming the validity of eviction based on bona fide need of a married daughter and the limited scope of revision under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Suresh Kumar v. Sharda Ahuja
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition as infructuous after possession was restored to the landlord, affirming bona fide need for eviction including for a married daughter and tenant's liability to pay mesne profits post eviction.
T.K. Roy v. Delhi University
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking retrospective promotion to Technical Officer, holding that the petitioner was not eligible as per service rules and had accepted promotion from a later date, barring reopening of the issue.
Vikas Kumar Jain v. Rishi Vashishtha & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a property sale agreement containing an arbitration clause.
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SHAGUN SURBHI ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes, holding that sufficient service attempts and existence of an arbitration clause mandate such appointment despite respondents' non-appearance.
MS TERRESTRIAL FOODS LIMITED v. SANSKRITI FOOD EQUIPMENTS EXIM PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a Purchase Order, allowing jurisdictional objections to be raised before the arbitrator.
Sanjeevani Ayurveda v. The Director General Directorate General of Health Services Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a healthcare services agreement, affirming the mandatory nature of arbitration agreement enforcement.
Muzaffar Ahmad and Anr v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to re-approach after the Tribunal decides on revival of an Original Application following dismissal of a related Supreme Court SLP.