Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S M.H. ONE TV NETWORK PVT. LTD. v. M/S MH 7 NEWS AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's trademark registration for 'MH7' due to deceptive similarity with the petitioner's prior registered trademark 'MH1/MH ONE', affirming protection against infringement and unfair competition.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Abhishek
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for Delhi Police Constable recruitment in light of tattoo restrictions, dismissing the petition challenging it.
Apollo Supply Chain Pvt. Ltd v. M/S Jalan Transolutions (India) Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, only the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement is to be examined and appointed a sole arbitrator despite respondent's claim of accord and satisfaction.
VCARE TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD v. MR NIKHIL RAI
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upon confirming the existence of a valid arbitration agreement, leaving all substantive disputes to arbitration.
M/S SOMA NEW TOWNS PVT LTD v. M/S VIKAS BUILDMART PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a share purchase agreement, directing arbitration as per the contract and Arbitration Act provisions.
SNAP ON TOOLS PRIVATE LIMITED v. MS METRICS APPLICATIONS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a reseller agreement where parties failed to agree on arbitrator appointment.
Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India through General Manager Northern Railways and Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate disputes arising from termination of a railway parcel leasing contract, following the Supreme Court's ruling invalidating the contract's arbitration appointment procedure.
Ashish Kochar v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a murder case, holding that the serious nature of the offence and likelihood of evidence tampering outweigh the petitioner’s liberty interests.
Malkhan Singh & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction but modified the sentence of appellants to the period already undergone due to prolonged trial and their personal circumstances.
Prakash Pipes Limited v. Jai Ambay Industries and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to cancel the respondent's trademark 'KIRANPARKASH' for fraudulent registration and deceptive similarity with the petitioner's prior mark 'PRAKASH'.
Dhan Prakash Gupta v. Income Tax Department
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the jurisdiction and merits of reassessment notices issued under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, holding that the Assessing Officer validly initiated proceedings based on information suggesting income escaping assessment.
Sunny @ Santosh Dharmu Bhosale v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court altered the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 IPC, sentencing him to the period already undergone.
M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE
The Supreme Court held that mobile towers and prefabricated buildings used by telecom service providers qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, entitling them to claim CENVAT credit on excise duties paid.
M.R. Ajayan v. State of Kerala & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing criminal proceedings for tampering with court evidence under Section 195(1)(b) CrPC and restored the trial, affirming liberal locus standi for third parties and the High Court's power to direct investigation.
Hetram @ Babli v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that power under Section 319 CrPC to summon an additional accused must be exercised only if the evidence, including cross-examination, prima facie implicates the person, and set aside the High Court order summoning the appellant.
Prashant v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 IPC, holding the relationship was consensual and continuation of prosecution would be an abuse of process.
Lakhani Housing Corporation Private Limited v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging MHADA's lawful tender-based redevelopment of dilapidated cooperative housing societies under Regulation 33(9) of the DCPR, affirming the State's authority and the petitioners' lack of locus to restrain the process.
Pawar Satya Prakash Tiwari v. Solutionsline Softtech Pvt. Ltd
The Bombay High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to discard additional affidavit and allowed production of documents with conditions, directing framing of limited additional issues and emphasizing procedural fairness in a software development recovery suit.
Anurag Vijaykumar Goel v. The State of Maharashtra
The High Court held that withdrawal of consent to mutual divorce under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act is a statutory right and does not constitute abuse of process to quash criminal proceedings alleging cruelty and dowry demands.
Sandeep Pandurang Patil v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court directed coordinated digital verification of real estate project documents under the RERA Act to prevent fraudulent registrations, while refusing a broad re-scrutiny absent specific evidence.