Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
State v. Lokesh
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused under Section 324 IPC due to insufficient and contradictory circumstantial evidence and the possibility of self-inflicted injury.
Joseph Tanoh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for a foreign national accused of trafficking commercial quantity heroin, holding that procedural irregularities did not warrant bail given the seriousness of the offence and flight risk.
New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr v. Subhash Chandra Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions challenging interim orders as infructuous following withdrawal of the underlying Original Applications before the Tribunal.
Sh. Gulzar Ahmed v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that under Mohammadan Law, a Gift Deed of immovable property need not be registered or stamped to be valid, and municipal authorities cannot reject mutation applications on this ground alone.
Subhan Ali v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with sexual assault of a minor, emphasizing the victim's credibility and the serious nature of the offences under BNSS and POCSO Act.
Abhinav Jindal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 52(1)
The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices issued beyond limitation and without mandatory approval under the amended Income Tax Act, affirming strict compliance with limitation and approval requirements.
Subhash v. Directorate General Border Security Force
The Delhi High Court held that a higher-level certificate satisfies the eligibility criteria requiring a lower-level certificate in BSF recruitment and directed reconsideration of the petitioner's candidature.
Kaushal Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld medical disqualification of a candidate with Coronal Hypospadias for appointment through LDCE to CAPF, affirming that medical fitness criteria must be independently satisfied regardless of prior appointments.
7 Roppen Transportation Services Private Limited v. Nipun Gupta & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed rectification petitions to cancel the respondents' identical 'RAPIDO' trademark registrations due to prior adoption and use by the petitioner, finding a likelihood of confusion and dishonest registration.
Mandeep Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to constitute an Integrated Medical Board within four weeks to assess the petitioner's medical fitness following a disability injury, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Amit Kumar Yadav v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court remanded a fitness determination back to the medical board for fresh expert examination where medical reports were inconclusive on disqualification under recruitment medical guidelines.
Sumit Sangwan v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful dismissal of a BSF officer under Section 10 of the BSF Act and Rule 20 of the BSF Rules after the Confirming Authority refused to confirm Security Force Court findings, rendering further trial impracticable.
Raju Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to provide reasons for applying the sealed cover procedure in the petitioner's promotion case, emphasizing adherence to the Supreme Court precedent in K. V. Janakiraman.
Arbind Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination from SSB service on the ground that it was not the appropriate forum under the doctrine of forum non conveniens.
Rajendera Prasad Verma v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to provide reasons for applying the sealed cover procedure in the petitioner's promotion case, emphasizing compliance with the Supreme Court precedent in K. V. Janakiraman.
Tapan Chetry v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to provide reasons for using the sealed cover procedure in the petitioner's promotion case, emphasizing adherence to Supreme Court guidelines and allowing the petitioner to challenge such reasons.
Dharmendra Kumar Singh & Ors. v. High Court of Jharkhand & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that judicial officers qualifying the suitability test under the 65% promotion quota are entitled to promotion based on individual merit without comparative ranking, granting appellants notional promotion and consequential benefits.
RajeeB Kalita v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that access to safe, clean, and separate toilet facilities in courts is a fundamental right under Article 21 and directed all High Courts and States to ensure their construction, maintenance, and accessibility for all genders including transgender persons and persons with disabilities.
CUDDALORE POWERGEN CORPORATION LTD v. M/S CHEMPLAST CUDDALORE VINYLS LIMITED
The Supreme Court held that a second suit for specific performance is not barred under Order II Rule 2 CPC when it arises from a different cause of action than a prior suit for injunction, restoring the plaint and directing trial on merits.
Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement v. The Branch Manager, The Goa State Co-op Bank Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that it has no power to condone delay beyond 120 days for appeals under Section 42 of the PMLA, 2002, dismissing the appeal filed after such delay.