Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mal Chand Ajit Kumar v. Poonam Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order on bona fide requirement grounds, holding that landlords need not specify the precise business and prior sale of other properties does not negate bona fide need under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Kanta Rani & Anr. v. Poonam Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order on bona fide need grounds, holding that landlords need not specify the precise business and that sale of other properties does not negate bona fide need under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Madan Lal Bhatia v. Poonam Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order on bona fide requirement grounds, holding that landlords need not specify the precise business and prior sales do not negate bona fide need under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Kundan Lal v. Poonam Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order based on the landlord's bona fide requirement under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that specifying the precise business is not necessary and prior sale of other properties does not negate bona fide need.
Om Prakash & Ors. v. Poonam Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of tenants on bona fide requirement grounds under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that specifying the precise nature of business is not necessary and limiting its revisionary jurisdiction.
Om Prakash Since Deceased & Ors. v. Poonam Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order on landlord’s bona fide requirement under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that specification of business nature is not mandatory and prior sale of other properties does not negate bona fide need.
M/S VOESTALPINE SCHIENEN GMBH v. DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. & ANR
The Delhi High Court set aside DMRC's suspension of business dealings with the petitioner for lack of prior approval from JICA as mandated by contract terms.
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Standard Chartered Grindlays Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld ITAT's order allowing deductions for NRI deposit solicitation expenses and full pension fund contributions beyond prescribed limits under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Kuldeep Singh v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a husband accused of brutally murdering his wife in a dowry death case, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and legislative intent behind Section 304B IPC.
Ujjair Ahmad @ Ozair Ahmed v. National Investigation Agency
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused under UAPA after 11 years of incarceration, balancing statutory bail restrictions with constitutional rights under Article 21 in light of prolonged trial delays.
Union of India & Anr v. Sangeeta Wahi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that security guards deployed at COVID-19 hospitals fall within the ambit of the government’s COVID-19 health workers insurance scheme, entitling their families to benefits under the welfare scheme.
M/S Hemogenomics Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a tender bid for non-compliance with land border restrictions under procurement rules, holding the petitioner to be an unregistered agent of a manufacturer from a country sharing a land border with India.
Vishal Verma v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court emphasized the paramount welfare of the child by enforcing visitation rights, addressing parental alienation, and granting interim custody to the father and paternal grandparents with supervised arrangements.
Ashok Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's claim for continuity of service from 2001 due to lack of formal appointment or salary evidence, affirming the Tribunal's order.
Nitish Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a candidate’s appointment due to moderate hydrocele under the Medical Guidelines, dismissing the petition challenging the medical fitness reports.
SI Arvind Verma v. Rinku @ Cholan
The Delhi High Court held that conviction under section 397 IPC is valid even without recovery of the weapon if the deadly weapon was used or brandished causing grievous hurt during robbery.
Tirupati Narashima Murari v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld AIMIM's registration as a political party, ruling that the Election Commission lacks power to deregister a party except on limited grounds such as fraud or constitutional non-compliance.
Sh Sri Chand Yadav & Ors. v. Ajay Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court stayed the execution of an eviction order until 30.06.2025 on condition of payment of user charges and filing an undertaking by tenants to vacate the premises.
Ms Aastha Agrawal v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 against a student for possession of a single live cartridge, holding that absence of conscious possession and criminal intent negates the offence.
Tarzan (India) Chemical Industries v. O.P Jindal
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant an extension to vacate premises by 30.04.2025 on payment of user charges and stayed the eviction order conditionally, subject to an undertaking.