Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Gaurav Trehan v. Gurvinder Singh Brar
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the trial court's refusal to reopen evidence after a long delay, emphasizing the need for procedural finality and sparing exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227.
Sunil Bailwal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of an FIR under Section 498A IPC, holding that disputed matrimonial facts and territorial jurisdiction issues require trial and cannot be decided at the quashing stage.
Daulat Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that deposit of auction proceeds in court pending entitlement adjudication does not discharge debt or stop contractual interest from running until actual payment is made.
Sagar Alias Sachin Rajendra Kusekar v. District Magistrate, Pune & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed a detention order under the MPDA Act due to unexplained delay in considering the petitioner's representation, violating his constitutional right under Article 22(5).
Maqsood Ahmed Jamaluddin Khan & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Casa Bella Realty LLP
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal challenging municipal notices against alleged unauthorized structures, holding that appellants failed to prove authorization or protection under slum laws and upholding the trial court's refusal of interim relief.
Ravi Raj Soulanki v. M/S KRY FOREVER LLP & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified an interim injunction restraining use of the mark 'The Crush Coffee', allowing the appellant to use it and seek vacation of injunction on the label mark, emphasizing prior litigation and expeditious adjudication.
Basanti Lata Jena & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider petitioners' claims for notional pay scale benefits as a representation and decide within twelve weeks, limiting retrospective relief to three years prior to petition filing.
Hemant Kumar Goyal @ Harish Goyal v. Yashwant Jain & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expedite the hearing of the appellant's proposed application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC against a restraint order in a trademark dispute, disposing of the appeal accordingly.
Rahul Kumar v. Central Reserve Police Force
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging medical disqualification in CAPF recruitment for lack of territorial jurisdiction as per the recruitment advertisement's jurisdiction clause.
Alemla Jamir v. National Investigation Agency
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's bail plea under the UA(P) Act, holding that prima facie evidence and framing of charges justify denial of bail despite prolonged incarceration and trial delays.
Ishita v. Union of India Ministry of Home Affairs
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the CRPF to consider the petitioner’s confirmation and seniority by awarding marks for partial jungle training completed and advanced training undergone, setting aside the requirement to repeat basic jungle training with junior batches.
Nafis-Ul-Afiin v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the enemy property declaration and rent notice for non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards under the Enemy Property Rules, 2015.
Shaukat Ali v. Smt. Kailash Rani and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the dismissal of a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act as barred by limitation, holding that dispossession occurred on the date the petitioner lost peaceful possession and the suit was filed beyond six months thereafter.
International Research Park Laboratories Ltd v. Directorate General of Foreign Trade
The Delhi High Court set aside penalty and debarment orders against an export unit and directed fresh adjudication of the petitioner's representation with opportunity to be heard and produce evidence.
N. Vijaya Kumar v. Technology Development Board
A director not responsible for the company's affairs at the time of cheque dishonour cannot be held liable under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and personal guarantees create only civil liability.
Vineet Kumar Sharma v. Northern Railways and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking restoration of a surrendered railway milk stall and compensation, holding that expired licenses and disputed factual claims are not amenable to writ relief under Article 226.
Sonu Bhati & Anr. v. Archana Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld that sale deeds executed in violation of court-ordered status quo are void ab initio and confer no rights on the transferee.
Kanwaljeet Dhami v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside charges against the petitioner for alleged historical rape due to unexplained delay and lack of prima facie evidence, emphasizing cautious exercise of revisional jurisdiction at the charge framing stage.
KBS Industries Ltd v. The Customs Central Excise and Service Tax Settlement Commission Principal Bench New Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Settlement Commission's order imposing interest on delayed customs duty payment under a conditional exemption scheme, affirming the validity of Notification No. 18/2015-Cus and rejecting the petitioners' challenge.
Union of India v. Sh. Chandru Dec Thr. Lrs. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal challenging the compensation of Rs. 16,750 per bigha for land in village Mamurpur, affirming the Supreme Court's prior valuation as binding.