Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Abhijit Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide the petitioner’s disability benefits claim within a specified time, without adjudicating the merits.
Saif Ali @ Sohan v. The State GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside guidelines delegating victim compensation determination under Section 357 CrPC to DSLSA, affirming that only Trial Courts have this discretion and protecting accused rights against undue delays and self-incrimination.
Shri Ramchander Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed disbursement of compensation with interest to petitioners recognized as legal heirs with interest in land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, despite acquisition lapse claims being negated by the Supreme Court.
AET Laboratories Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Helsinn Healthcare SA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an ad interim ex-parte injunction restraining the commercial launch of an allegedly infringing product, allowing the appellants to seek vacation of the injunction before the Single Judge.
Sahil Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking bonus marks for an NCC-A Certificate not claimed in the application form, holding that declarations in the application are binding and technical glitches do not justify granting unclaimed benefits.
Wasim v. Mumtaz Begum
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate premises subject to payment of user charges and an undertaking, staying the eviction order until 31.12.2025.
Rina Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking compensation for electrocution death on the ground that disputed questions of fact regarding negligence require adjudication by a civil court, not under Article 226 writ jurisdiction.
Pradeep Kumar v. Election Commission of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions under Article 226 challenging election matters during the election process are barred by Article 329(b) and the Representation of People Act, 1951, and the exclusive remedy lies in filing an election petition after the election.
Munni Devi v. M/S Olive Exim Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition, affirming that companies can file eviction petitions under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act and that pendency of similar matters before larger benches does not bar adjudication on merits.
Mohd Iqbal v. Azmmuddin & Anr
The High Court upheld the eviction order against the tenant, holding that the landlord proved a better title and the tenant's ownership claim based on unregistered documents and continued rent payments was insufficient to warrant a trial.
Chitra Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed a medical re-examination of the petitioner for appointment as Constable, holding that disqualification without further diagnostic evaluation was unjustified.
Radhey Shyam v. Parmeshwari Das & Anr.
The High Court held that suits pending before courts lacking jurisdiction due to administrative changes should be transferred under Section 24 CPC rather than returned under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC to preserve prior proceedings.
G. Balasubramanian v. C.B.I.
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges against a retired bank official, ruling that the amended sanction requirement under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not apply to offences registered before the amendment.
Vijender Gupta v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that while laying CAG Reports before the Legislative Assembly is a mandatory constitutional duty, the power to summon the Assembly rests solely with the Speaker and is immune from judicial review, thus refusing to direct a special sitting for tabling delayed reports.
Bhagwan Malik v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted furlough to a long-term convict despite prior late surrender during furlough, emphasizing the rehabilitative purpose of furlough under prison rules and subject to strict conditions.
Nandan Singh v. Pratap Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s finding of a valid oral partition of joint family properties based on conduct and evidence, dismissing the appellant’s suit for partition and rendition of accounts.
Badrinarayana Jaganathan v. State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against employees accused of harassment and intimidation, holding that the allegations did not prima facie disclose offences under the IPC and constituted an abuse of process.
Harshit Harish Jain & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the pre-amendment two-year limitation period applies to stamp duty refund claims based on cancellation deeds executed before amendment, and that the revenue authority cannot review its own refund order without statutory power.
M. Venkateswaran v. The State
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act but reduced the sentence to the period already served and directed payment of compensation to the complainant.
T. Rajamoni v. The Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited
The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal to award a reasonable lump sum compensation for loss of income to a seriously injured mason, refining the application of the multiplier method and disability assessment in motor accident claims.