New Delhi Municipal Council v. Mahabir Parsad

Delhi High Court · 24 Jan 2025 · 2025:DHC:416-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul
W.P.(C) 13581/2024
2023 (3) LLJ 404
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as not pressed in view of binding precedents and directed implementation of the Tribunal's judgment.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 13581/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 13581/2024, CM APPLs. 56735/2024 & 56737/2024
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sunder Khatri, ASC
WITH
Mr. Ravi Grover and Mr. Naman Khatri, Advs.
WITH
Ms. Reena Singh, Asstt.
Accounts Officer (Medical Services)
Dr. Madan Narain, CMO (Medical)
VERSUS
MAHABIR PARSAD .....Respondent
Through: Ms. Sonika Gill, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
ORDER (ORAL)
24.01.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
JUDGMENT

1. As the issue in question stands covered in favour of the respondent by the judgments of this Court in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v Pardeep Singh[1], NDMC v Sudha Sharma[2], UOI v S.P. Mediratta[3], Suresh Khanna v UOI[4], Hira Lal Bhat v BSNL[5], Shiva Kant Jha v UOI[6], UOI v Joginder Singh[7], UOI v Surender Kumar

2023 (3) LLJ 404 W.P.(C) 13581/2024 Kaur[8], Jasbir Singh v UOI[9], Jagir Kaur v UOI10, Chhotu Ram Yadav v State of Haryana11 and Manish Kumar v UOI12, Mr. Sunder Khatri, learned ASC appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, does not press this writ petition.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. Let the judgment of the Tribunal be implemented within a period of four weeks from today.

3. There shall be no orders as to costs.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.