Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
SI Sahil v. Om Prakash
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's acquittal of respondents under Sections 506 and 384 IPC, dismissing the State's appeal for lack of proof of criminal intimidation and extortion.
Prabhu Dayal v. State, NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court set aside the charge of gang rape under Section 376D IPC against the petitioner due to lack of material implicating him in the offence at the charge framing stage.
Bharat Mohan Kohli v. State & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone a 636-day delay in challenging an order rejecting impleadment of a claimant alleging marriage to the deceased, emphasizing the duty of litigants to be vigilant and provide satisfactory explanations for delay.
Vikash Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that it can recall its quashing order passed per incuriam due to overruling of relied Supreme Court precedent, as the bar under Section 362 Cr.P.C. does not apply to such recall under inherent powers.
Tanisha Rani Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi
The High Court held that summoning a person not named in the charge-sheet under Section 319 Cr.P.C. requires strong evidence adduced before the court and set aside the summoning order against the petitioner for lack of such evidence.
Santosh Kumar Yadav @ Ranjan v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a juvenile in conflict with law is not required to disclose juvenile offences in service verification forms, and termination on such grounds is unsustainable, directing reinstatement of the petitioner.
Makhdum Ali Haidar v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed the adverse APAR grading of a BSF officer for lack of justifiable reasons and procedural fairness, holding that regularized Over Stay Leave cannot justify adverse remarks and no second representation lies after the first is decided.
JAGWANT KAUR v. UNION OF INDIA
The Supreme Court upheld the allotment of LPG distributorship to the 4th respondent, ruling that the land offered complied with guidelines and rejecting the appellant's challenge of duplication and invalid alternate land.
Somdatt Builders –NCC – NEC(JV) v. National Highways Authority of India
The Supreme Court restored an arbitral award holding that increase in contract quantities without instructed variation does not entitle rate revision, emphasizing limited judicial interference under the Arbitration Act.
Ramesh Baghel v. State of Chhattisgarh
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal directing burial of the deceased in the appellant's private land within the native village, emphasizing the State's duty to prevent religious discrimination and to formally designate Christian burial grounds.
Arif Md. Yeasin Jwadder v. State of Assam
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal challenging alleged fake police encounters in Assam, directing independent inquiry by the State Human Rights Commission with victim participation and legal safeguards to ensure compliance with constitutional and PUCL procedural safeguards.
Anil Shivajirao Bhosale v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Bombay High Court granted bail to the accused under PMLA after he completed half the maximum sentence, emphasizing the constitutional right to speedy trial over statutory bail restrictions.
M/s.N.K Proteins Limited v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to the MPID Act and the court has discretion to condone delay beyond 30 days under Section 5(3), dismissing the appellant's challenge to the condonation order.
Ashok Kumar v. Sitara & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a belated amendment application in an eviction suit, emphasizing the requirement of due diligence under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC as amended in 2022.
Kishan Lal Bhandula v. Sushil Bhandula
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging possession recovery as barred by limitation, holding that a 1327-day delay was not sufficiently explained to condone under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Porter Buildcon Private Ltd & Ors v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that aggrieved parties must exhaust statutory appeals under the Benami Act against adjudication orders, condoned delay in filing appeals due to pending writ petition, and declined interim relief against confiscation proceedings.
Usha International Limited v. The Sub Divisional Magistrate (Vasant Vihar) and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the revenue authorities to update the mutation entry in the revenue records in favor of the petitioner upon filing of the application and compliance with statutory requirements.
SI Kriti Singh v. Saiyama @ Saiba
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discharge of the accused from charges of trafficking and conspiracy, holding that mere passive knowledge without overt acts is insufficient to frame charges at the prima facie stage.
Sanjeev Sharma v. The State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition after finding the missing person voluntarily residing in a rehabilitation centre and mentally stable, negating unlawful detention.
Sham It Kumar v. Ms Shilpa Ghosh & Anr.
Delhi High Court fixed use and occupation charges at Rs. 15,000 per month for a tenant using residential premises for commercial purposes, subject to payment for interim protection.