Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ramesh A. Naika v. Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence but commuted his death sentence to life imprisonment after considering mitigating factors.
P. Rammohan Rao v. K. Srinivas
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a revised government order granting seniority to temporarily appointed AEEs from their initial appointment date, rejecting the High Court's quashing of the order on grounds of functus officio and natural justice.
SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & ANR v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS
The Supreme Court upheld directions restricting appearance markings to authorized Advocates physically present, emphasizing adherence to statutory Rules and rejecting claims that such directions infringe Advocates' professional rights.
Gunwant Tarachand Jain @ Nikesh Madhani v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the legality of the petitioner’s arrest and communication of grounds within four minutes, dismissing the challenge to the Sessions Court order directing his surrender.
Dr. Kishore Bisure v. The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
The Bombay High Court granted bail to the accused in a PMLA money laundering case, emphasizing the primacy of fundamental rights and the need to relax stringent bail conditions due to prolonged trial delay and lack of direct evidence.
Dheeraj Wadhawan v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Bombay High Court granted bail under Section 436-A CrPC to accused in a PMLA case after prolonged pre-trial incarceration exceeding half the maximum sentence, affirming the constitutional right to speedy trial and liberty under Article 21.
Dheeraj Wadhawan v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Bombay High Court granted bail under Section 436-A CrPC to accused in a PMLA case after prolonged pre-trial detention exceeding half the maximum sentence, affirming the right to speedy trial under Article 21 despite rigours of PMLA.
Navi Mumbai Merchants Chambers v. Arjun Krishnarao Deshmukh
The Bombay High Court upheld the registration of a cooperative society under MOFA, ruling that only persons with enforceable agreements to sell hold 'taken flats' and that the promoter counts as a single member for registration purposes.
Avinash Seshrao Wankhede v. The Nashik Municipal Corporation
The Bombay High Court directed regularization and absorption of long-serving daily wage workers of Nashik Municipal Corporation, overruling refusals based on establishment expenditure and clarifying the scope of Uma Devi judgment in light of recent Supreme Court rulings.
Avinash Seshrao Wankhede v. The Nashik Municipal Corporation
The Bombay High Court directed regularization and absorption of long-serving daily wage workers of Nashik Municipal Corporation, quashing termination orders and mandating creation of posts by the State Government in line with Supreme Court precedents.
Neelkanth Heights Cooperative Housing Societies Association Ltd. v. Abhinav Real Estate Private Limited
The Bombay High Court held that a promoter cannot delay statutory conveyance obligations under MOFA by relying on phased development or contractual clauses, and directed issuance of a certificate of deemed conveyance to the cooperative housing society.
FIITJEE Ltd. v. Madhulika Singh
The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference under Article 227 in arbitral orders is limited to exceptional cases of perversity and dismissed the petition challenging the Arbitrator's refusal to exclude certain witnesses.
Jyotish Kumar Misra and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider writ petitions as representations for grant of notional pay scale benefits within twelve weeks, without expressing opinion on merits.
Vikram Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging Air Force service policy, holding that such service matters fall exclusively within the Armed Forces Tribunal's jurisdiction.
Anwar Kamal v. Subhan Ahmed
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order against the tenant, holding that the landlord proved bona fide need and better title, and the tenant failed to raise triable issues for leave to defend.
Sachin Nagpal v. Gopal Krishan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition challenging the dismissal of leave to defend in an eviction case, affirming the landlord's bona fide need and limited scope of revisional jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Amarchand v. Rakesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the landlord's bona fide requirement, rejecting the tenant's claim of alternate accommodation and limiting the scope of revisionary jurisdiction.
Shri Anil Arvind Bhai Vaiwala v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory 20% deposit condition for suspension of sentence under Section 138 NI Act is not absolute and appellate courts must consider exceptions even if not specifically pleaded.
Shri Anil Arvind Bhai Vaiwala v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory 20% deposit condition for suspension of sentence under Section 389 CrPC in Section 138 NI Act appeals is not absolute and appellate courts must consider exceptions even if not specifically pleaded.
Shri Anil Arvind Bhai Vaiwala v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory 20% deposit condition for suspension of sentence under Section 138 NI Act is not absolute and appellate courts must consider exceptions based on the appellant’s circumstances, setting aside orders that failed to do so.