Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Expeditors International of Washington Inc
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tax department's appeals, holding that Freight Logistic Support services do not qualify as Fee for Technical Services under the Income Tax Act and India-US DTAA as they do not satisfy the 'make available' condition requiring transfer of specialized technical knowledge.
Anish Ahmed v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking directions to register FIR and disciplinary proceedings, holding that the FIR was already registered and the dispute over property ownership is a civil matter.
MR ABHISHEK SHARMA & ANR. v. ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the patent appeal for delay and lack of technical invention, holding that abstract theories without scientific basis are not patentable under the Patents Act.
New India Assurance Co. Ltd v. Shree Ram Polymer
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing insurance claim payment, holding that consent letters given under duress do not bar further claims and limiting court interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
TATA POWER SOLAR SYSTEMS LIMITED & ANR. v. WWW.TATAPOWERSOLARDEALERSHIP.CO.IN & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Tata Power Solar, restraining defendants from trademark infringement and passing off, suspending impugned domain names, and freezing related bank accounts.
Braj Mohan Goel & Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal filed beyond the limitation period due to inordinate delay without sufficient cause, emphasizing litigants' duty to be vigilant and rejecting poverty or counsel's negligence as grounds for condonation.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3 v. M/s Ridgeview Construction Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's quashing of reassessment proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that seized material must be incriminating and pertain to the relevant assessment years to justify reopening assessments.
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Nagarjuna Agrichem Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld arbitral awards in an insurance claim dispute, affirming arbitrability of quantum disputes under the policies and rejecting the insurer's challenge on jurisdiction and patent illegality grounds.
The State of NCT of Delhi v. Jitender Sahney
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a motor accident case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove rash and negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt.
CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. ANIL KUMAR & ANR.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, validating service of notice via email and WhatsApp, to adjudicate a loan repayment dispute under a valid arbitration clause.
Rajesh Gandhi v. Ajay Mittal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition as infructuous after possession was restored to the landlord in execution proceedings, affirming the limited scope of revision jurisdiction and the presumption of bona fide need for eviction.
Ujjawal Sharma v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a fatal road accident case, emphasizing the completion of investigation, disputed facts for trial, and allegations of police misconduct requiring separate inquiry.
M/S Mohan Brothers v. Mr. Mithilesh Pandey
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award of compensation for illegal termination, holding that the petitioner failed to prove voluntary abandonment or valid full and final settlement, and reaffirmed the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226.
EX-CT/WC Pardeshi Jitendra Singh v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of a CRPF personnel for unauthorized absence, holding that the departmental inquiry and punishment were lawful and not subject to judicial interference.
Sh. Subhash Chand v. Smt. Maya & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the husband's obligation to maintain his wife and children under Section 125 Cr.P.C., modifying the maintenance amount based on minimum wages due to lack of concrete income proof.
Rahul v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner who was found prima facie to have instigated and facilitated an armed attack causing grievous injury, necessitating custodial interrogation.
Ved Prakash Thakur v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal to stay auction proceedings and recognized the extended payment period under the DDA brochure, directing deposit of the balance amount with interest pending final adjudication.
Religare Finvest Limited v. Lakshmi Vilas Bank Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the State Bank of India's application for impleadment as a necessary party defendant in a suit challenging unauthorized liquidation of hypothecated fixed deposits, emphasizing the court's discretion under Order I Rule 10 CPC to ensure effective adjudication.
Bir Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition alleging violation of parking restrictions by directing the petitioner to submit a fresh representation for administrative disposal, emphasizing procedural fairness and exhaustion of remedies.
M/S AIMS RETAIL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Unlocking or activating mobile phones after manufacture constitutes 'taken into use' under customs law, disqualifying exporters from claiming duty drawback under Section 75 of the Customs Act, 1962.