Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Microsoft Corporation and Anr. v. Mr. S.K. Das and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Microsoft Corporation for unauthorized hard disk loading of its copyrighted software by the defendants, affirming protection of software under Indian copyright law.
Sharat Kumar Dutta v. State
The Delhi High Court granted letters of administration with the Will annexed to the petitioner after validating the registered Will and finding no objections from heirs under the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
Shivalik Bimetal Controls Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
The Delhi High Court held that a reopening notice under section 148 issued beyond four years is invalid unless the assessee failed to disclose material facts, and set aside the notice issued for assessment year 2005-06.
P.D. Gupta & Anr. v. ECE Industries Ltd.
The High Court of Delhi allowed the petition CRL.M.C.1444/2012 in terms of its judgment in a related petition CRL.M.C.1443/2012 involving the same parties.
P.D. Gupta & Anr. v. ECE Industries Ltd.
The Delhi High Court quashed complaints under Section 138 NI Act against former directors relying on uncontroverted Form 32 filings showing resignation prior to cheque dishonour, preventing abuse of court process.
Lodhi Property Company Ltd v. Rajbir Singh & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a cheque dishonour complaint for non-appearance, restoring the case under its inherent powers subject to costs.
Council for Advancement of People’s Action & Rural Technology v. Shri Ramesh Chander
The Delhi High Court held that a daily wager is not entitled to equal pay with regular employees but termination without compliance with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act is illegal and void.
Bhim Singh Bajeli v. P.O. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal
The Delhi High Court held that while the Industrial Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to award interest under Section 33C(2), the High Court can direct interest payment under its writ jurisdiction in cases of delayed payment of industrial awards.
Babu Ram Aggarwal & Anr. v. Krishan Kumar Bhatnagar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance due to lack of valid written consent from co-owners and improper service of summons, emphasizing strict compliance with evidentiary and procedural requirements.
Ram Chander v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a police officer for extortion and unauthorized entry despite procedural lapses, emphasizing substantive evidence and directing consideration of compassionate allowance for long service.
Anant Prasad & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that members of the Delhi Home Guards are volunteers without entitlement to regularization or permanent employment, and termination upon completion of tenure is lawful without invoking termination procedures.
Sanjay Sharma v. Ajay Sharma and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a party who benefits from an interim order must make restitution or compensate the other party if the suit is withdrawn or the interim order is reversed, and allowed defendant's claim for damages at the agreed rate following plaintiff's withdrawal of partition suit.
HIJKIJM CI IAND JAIN v. MC13
The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of allotment without proper communication and hearing is arbitrary but directed reconsideration of allotment at current rates if the petitioner is eligible and plots are available.
K M Aggarwal v. C M Jain
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint and summons after the parties amicably settled the dispute with payment of Rs. 5 lakhs as full and final settlement.
Sahib Singh v. Arvinder Kaur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a valid adoption under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 cannot be cancelled or reverted, dismissing the appellant's claim to reversion and denying interim relief in a partition suit.
Rajesh Goel v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 354, and 506 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's disinterest in pursuing the case.
Sudama Devi v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking direction for a fair investigation, holding that the FIR and investigation must be based on the eyewitness's initial statement and that the petitioner failed to justify implicating additional accused persons.
Rama Construction Company v. IWS NCC Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed arbitration petitions as withdrawn after the parties amicably settled their dispute through a recorded settlement agreement.
Shobha Devi & Ors. v. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the review petition holding that the insurance company is liable to pay compensation where the deceased was traveling as owner of goods in a three-wheeler with seating capacity of two, despite incorrect seating capacity stated in the insurance policy.
LODHI PROPERTY COMPANY LTD v. RAJBIR SINGH & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal under Section 482 CrPC to set aside dismissal of a cheque dishonour complaint for non-appearance, restoring the complaint subject to costs.