Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rajender Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi; Bhagirath v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for robbery under Section 397 IPC, ruling that any knife used to cause terror qualifies as a deadly weapon and that identification and recovery evidence sufficiently proved the appellants' guilt.
Ram Singh & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a video interview of a rape complainant is not illegal under Section 327(3) CrPC and can be used to confront the witness, setting aside the trial court's order rejecting its use.
Ram Kishore Sharma v. State
The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration to the petitioner as the sole Class-II heir of an intestate deceased, subject to procedural compliance.
Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld DDA's revised land allotment rates and allowed a limited extension for payment with interest, dismissing appellants' claims for lower rates and interest waiver on larger plots.
CIT DELHI-IV v. HUGHES COMMUNICATION INDIA LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of income tax additions relating to stock impairment and sales tax adjustments, affirming the accepted accounting principle of valuing stock at the lower of cost or net realizable value.
Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals by granting appellants time to pay the balance premium with interest for 300 sq. meter plots allotted by DDA and directed consideration of NOC requests for mortgage.
Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that appellants must pay the revised land premium with interest for larger plots allotted by DDA and dismissed their claims for allotment at earlier lower rates, granting limited extension for payment and directions on NOC issuance.
Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals granting limited time to pay revised land premium with interest for plots allotted by DDA, rejecting claims for lower rates and directing consideration of mortgage NOC applications.
Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld DDA's revised plot allotment rates and interest charges, granting appellants limited time to pay dues and directing consideration of mortgage NOC requests.
Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court allowed appellants three months to pay revised land premium with interest for 300 sq. meter plots allotted by DDA, rejecting claims for lower rates and directing consideration of mortgage NOC requests.
Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld DDA's revised land rates and interest charges for allotment of 300 sq. meter plots, granting appellants limited time to pay and directing consideration of mortgage requests as per policy.
Om Prakash v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals by granting time to pay revised land premium with interest for larger plots allotted by DDA, rejecting claims for allotment at earlier lower rates or waiver of interest.
Upendernath Bhardwaj v. Yogender Nath Bhardwaj & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn on the appellant's request, advising amendment of the plaint for better case establishment, without commenting on merits.
M/S RELIANCE CAPITAL LTD v. RAJ GANGWANI & ORS
The Delhi High Court allowed the decree-holder to withdraw execution petitions after partial payment and loan revival, vacating the attachment order.
Mohd. Parviz Sonij v. Respondent
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking compensation for electrocution injuries, holding that disputed factual issues preclude adjudication under Article 226 and such claims must be pursued in appropriate civil proceedings.
Vivek Kochher & Anr. v. KYK Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn on the appellants' request, leaving the question of law open for trial.
DFSIGN DIALOGUES INDIA PVT LTD v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition with the condition that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner pending the decision of a third Judge resolving a difference of opinion between Division Bench Judges.
Nina Khanna v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act cannot be quashed at the initial stage merely on the ground that cheques were issued as security when the issue is disputed and must be decided by the trial court.
Sh. Baldev Saran Gumber & Ors. v. Indian Road Construction Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
Employees of a sick PSU who accepted voluntary retirement benefits cannot claim pay revision, and financial incapacity of the employer bars such claims, leading to dismissal of the writ petition.
Har Pyari v. Geeta Mishra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal holding that sufficient opportunities were given to the appellant to lead evidence, and no substantial question of law arose to interfere with concurrent findings of fact.