Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Abhishek Kumar v. Neha Lal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the trial court's dismissal of applications under the Domestic Violence Act and Section 340 Cr.P.C., holding that the substantive dismissal of the main complaint precludes separate adjudication and affirming the respondent's reproductive rights under Article 21.
I. S. Juneja v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against the petitioner for sexual harassment, holding that the chargesheet was not barred by limitation but the allegations did not disclose an offence and prior departmental exoneration barred criminal prosecution.
Sanwar @ Akbar Malik v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a sexual assault case on verified medical grounds and dismissed the petition to cancel interim bail, emphasizing trial as the forum for testing allegations.
Ramesh v. The State (N.C.T of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from rape under Section 376 IPC to sexual assault under Section 9 POCSO, upholding kidnapping charges and emphasizing the necessity of penetration and corroborative medical evidence for rape convictions.
Amitoje India Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Classic Display Systems Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' interim injunction application in a patent infringement suit, holding that the defendant raised a credible challenge to the patent's validity based on prior art and prior user rights.
MAGMA HDI GIC LTD v. POONAM KUMARI & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's award computing loss of dependency based on Delhi minimum wages for a deceased employed in Delhi despite his Bihar residence, emphasizing acceptance of oral evidence in informal employment cases.
HUBEI JI SU KAN DIAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. v. LARK ENGINEERING COMPANY (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking rectification of the respondent's 'LARK' trademark in Class 42, holding that the respondent had bona fide use of the mark for computer hardware and software services associated with its machinery, protecting the registration from cancellation.
Nippon Steel Corporation v. The Controller of Patents
The Delhi High Court held that a signed employment agreement and declaration constitute valid proof of right under Section 7(2) of the Patents Act for filing a patent application involving a deceased inventor, setting aside the Controller's rejection.
Osaka University v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court set aside the patent controller's rejection of a nucleoside patent application for procedural infirmities and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with proper opportunity to the applicant.
U.S. GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL v. DEMING CERTIFICATION SERVICES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and exemplary damages to the USGBC against Deming Certification for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off, exercising its power under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to the defendant's failure to file a written statement.
Reckitt and Colman Overseas Health Limited v. Ind Swift Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the registration of 'DECA-NEUROPHEN' as deceptively similar to the prior registered mark 'NUROFEN', holding that respondent No. 1 was not an honest concurrent user under Section 12 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Amazon Seller Services Private Limited & Anr v. Amazonbuys.in & Ors.
Delhi High Court granted injunctions against fraudulent domain name registrations infringing trademarks, directing registrars to comply with court orders while balancing privacy laws and intermediary liabilities.
Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative v. Registrant of IFFCOFRANCHISE.COM & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed Domain Name Registrars, banks, and law enforcement agencies to implement systemic measures including injunctions, data disclosure, and beneficiary name verification to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud via fraudulent domain names.
Natraj Enterprises v. Commissioner of DGST and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against a GST adjudication order pending Supreme Court's decision on the validity of extension notifications, emphasizing the right to be heard and appellate remedies.
Ong Kok Thong v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court directed a personal hearing for the petitioner in the Customs appeal and disposed of the writ petition seeking implementation of an Order-in-Original permitting unconditional release of detained goods.
M/S PADAM KISHORE AND COMPANY v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order passed without hearing the petitioner, granting opportunity to file reply and personal hearing, while leaving the validity of GST extension notifications pending Supreme Court decision.
Sight and Sound India Private Limited v. The Commissioner of SGST & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order passed without proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving open the validity of GST notifications pending Supreme Court decision.
Globe Overseas Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of DGST and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication after the petitioner is afforded an opportunity to reply, while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Sight and Sound India Private Limited v. The Commissioner of SGST & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST tax demand order passed ex-parte due to lack of fair hearing and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Rahul Bhargava & Anr. v. M/S Neo Developers Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act is maintainable despite prior RERA remedies, emphasizing the distinct and protective nature of such reliefs to preserve arbitration's efficacy.