Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Captain Baliram Bhaskarrao Shinde v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court quashed an FIR under Section 304 Part II IPC against a retired army officer, holding his actions in self-defence lawful and the prosecution mala fide to cover police negligence.
Hashim Basheer v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that sentences in multiple Section 138 NI Act cases arising from the same loan transaction should run concurrently and ordered the petitioner's release after considering his prolonged imprisonment.
Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd v. Amul-Franchise.in & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Domain Name Registrars must verify registrant identities and cooperate with enforcement agencies to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud, granting injunctions against infringing domain names and directing banks to freeze fraudulent accounts.
Bajaj Finance Limited v. Registrant of www.bajaj-finserve.org & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that domain name registrars and banks must implement stringent measures including disclosure, suspension, and beneficiary verification to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud via fraudulent domain names.
Microsoft Corporation & Anr. v. PCPatchers Technology Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld interim injunctions against fraudulent domain name registrations infringing Microsoft's trademarks and issued comprehensive directions to domain registrars and authorities to curb trademark misuse online.
N’VYBE E COMMERCE v. MANASH LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte interim injunction in a trademark dispute, holding that prior use by the defendant requires notice and opportunity before granting such relief.
Ultratech Cement Limited v. www.ultratechcements.com & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that domain name registrars must verify registrant identities and comply with court orders to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud, directing systemic reforms involving banks, law enforcement, and government agencies.
JOCKEY INTERNATIONAL INC. v. WWW.JOCKEYFRANCHISE.COM & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that Domain Name Registrars and banks must implement robust verification and cooperation mechanisms to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud through fraudulent domain names, directing systemic reforms and enforcement measures.
Mukesh Paswan v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging dismissal from service after the respondents agreed to reinstate the petitioner subject to verification of credentials.
Kajaria Ceramics Limited v. GoDaddy.com LLC & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held domain name registrars liable for verifying registrant identities and issued comprehensive directions to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud involving fraudulent domain names, coordinating banks, telecom providers, and law enforcement agencies.
BURGER KING CORPORATION v. SWAPNIL PATIL & ORS.
Delhi High Court granted injunctions and issued directions to Domain Name Registrars, banks, and government agencies to curb fraudulent use of Burger King trademarks in domain names and associated cyber fraud.
State NCT of Delhi v. Subodh Kumar & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that credible testimony of a rape victim alone suffices for conviction without corroboration, set aside the acquittal, and convicted the accused under Section 376(2)(g) IPC.
Satender Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court affirmed convictions under Section 489C IPC for fake currency possession but modified sentences to the period already served, applying Supreme Court guidelines on release after substantial custody.
XIAOMI TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. WWW.XIAOMI-INDIA.XYZ & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that Domain Name Registrars must verify registrant identities and cooperate with trademark owners and law enforcement to prevent fraudulent use of domain names infringing registered trademarks, issuing comprehensive directions to multiple stakeholders to curb cyber fraud and protect intellectual property rights.
Mother Dairy Fruit & Vegetable Pvt. Ltd. v. Kumar Prahlad & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that domain name registrars must exercise due diligence to prevent trademark infringement via fraudulent domain registrations and directed systemic reforms involving banks, law enforcement, and regulators to combat cyber fraud.
HT MEDIA LTD v. POOJA SHARMA & ORS.
Delhi High Court directs comprehensive multi-stakeholder measures including Domain Name Registrars, banks, and law enforcement to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud via fraudulent domain names.
Emitec Gesellschaft Fur Emissionstechnologie MBH v. Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trademarks
The Delhi High Court set aside the patent refusal order for lack of inventive step due to procedural defects and remanded the matter for fresh consideration applying the established five-step test.
Dhruv Narayan Singh v. Arif Masood
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Respondent's application to reject the election petition at the threshold, holding that the petition discloses a cause of action and the disputed bank letters are prima facie genuine, requiring trial on merits.
TATA SKY LIMITED v. S G ENTERPREISES – TATA SKY SALES AND SERVICES AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that domain registrars and banks must implement robust verification and cooperation mechanisms to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud via fraudulent domain names, granting interim injunctions and issuing systemic directions to stakeholders.
Resham Priyadarshini v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against the refusal of a patent application, holding that the claims were sufficiently clear when read with dependent claims and specification, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of inventive step.