Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
IMPRESARIO ENTERTAINMENT AND HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. v. M/S THE SHAKE SOCIAL
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions to the Plaintiff against the Defendant for trademark infringement and passing off, declaring the Plaintiff's marks as well-known under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Mohd Fahad v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court extended interim bail on humanitarian grounds with a strict surrender deadline and refused further extensions to prevent misuse.
Mankind Pharma Limited v. The Registrar of Trade Marks
The Delhi High Court allowed Mankind Pharma's appeal, holding that its prior use and reputation in the 'KIND' family of marks entitles it to registration of 'PETKIND' despite a prior identical application, as no likelihood of confusion arises under the Trade Marks Act.
Phonographic Performance Limited v. Pass Code Hospitality Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed continuation of interim license fee payments by the defendant to the plaintiff pending final adjudication, holding that the plaintiff’s competence to issue licenses without registration under Section 33 of the Copyright Act remains sub judice before the Supreme Court.
Living Media India Limited v. Zee Media Corporation Limited
The Court held that while the Plaintiff has no exclusivity over the word 'DUNIYADARI' alone, the Defendant is restrained from using a deceptively similar composite mark and trade dress for the same news programme to prevent infringement and passing off.
Badruddin v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to proclaimed offenders in a criminal case due to a bona fide settlement and cooperation with investigation, emphasizing that proclamation is not an absolute bar to bail.
Sabir Ali @ Sikku v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused under the NDPS Act due to lack of substantive incriminating evidence, holding that mere electronic records and telephonic connectivity do not justify continued incarceration.
Imran Khan v. The State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail granted where no direct incriminating evidence linked the accused to the contraband, and mere association with the main accused was insufficient to deny liberty.
Yash v. State Govt of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused in a familial property dispute case involving minor injuries, emphasizing protection of liberty where police do not intend arrest.
Sh. Sanket Behari Mittal v. Sh. Subhash Chand Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the landlord's revision petition upholding the dismissal of eviction petition for failure to prove bona fide requirement and non-availability of suitable alternative accommodation under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Hind Samrajya Party v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Election Symbols Order, 1968 and the Election Commission's power under Article 324 to regulate election symbols and political party recognition, dismissing the petition challenging discrimination against newly registered parties.
Jagmeet Chopra v. Basant Sawhney
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's modification of interim visitation rights, emphasizing the paramount welfare of the child over parental convenience amid ongoing disputes.
Pogadadabnda Revathi & Anr. v. The State of Telangana
The Supreme Court held that police custody cannot be granted to accused persons already on bail without first cancelling the bail order, setting aside orders granting police custody months after bail was granted.
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Anurudh & Anr
The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its bail jurisdiction by mandating medical age determination at investigation stage in POCSO cases, clarifying the proper legal framework for age determination and bail under the POCSO and Juvenile Justice Acts.
X v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s bail order in a serious POCSO case involving gang rape of a minor, emphasizing the gravity of offences, victim protection, and the need for fair trial.
M/S JINDAL EQUIPMENT LEASING CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
The Supreme Court held that substitution of shares in amalgamation, when held as stock-in-trade, constitutes taxable business income under Section 28 of the Income Tax Act, and the High Court did not exceed its jurisdiction in remanding the matter for determination of the nature of holding.
Rajeev Kumar Agarwal v. The State of Telangana
The Supreme Court held that cognizance of offences under Sections 448 and 451 of the Companies Act cannot be taken on a private complaint without compliance with Section 212(6), quashing such proceedings while allowing continuation of IPC offences.
Bharat Kantilal Dalal v. Surendra Kantilal Dalal and 32 Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a Civil Court has jurisdiction to entertain a Suit for administration of a deceased's estate even when probate proceedings are pending, rejecting the plea for dismissal of the Suit on grounds of exclusive probate jurisdiction.
Manjeet Singh T. Anand v. Nishant Enterprises HUF Thru. Its Karta & Anr.
The Bombay High Court held that as the Seat Court it has jurisdiction to execute an arbitral award against an HUF and that the Karta of a trading HUF is personally liable for unsatisfied debts, allowing interim relief including appointment of a Court Receiver.
Sh. Trilok Agarwal & Ors. v. Land Acquisition Collector (North)
The Delhi High Court directed the Land Acquisition Collector to make a reference to the Court of Additional District Judge for determination of compensation payable to petitioners for acquired land under Sections 30 and 31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.