Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
TRODAT GMBH & ANR. v. ADDPRINT INDIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed the defendant to manufacture and market a proposed alternate stamp design, holding it does not prima facie infringe the plaintiffs' registered designs under the Designs Act, while permitting plaintiffs to challenge the new design at trial.
Kanta Devi & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a compensation claim under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, holding that absence of a valid railway ticket on the deceased negated his status as a bonafide passenger entitled to compensation.
Bimla Devi v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of probate of a duly executed Will excluding natural heirs, holding that absence of suspicious circumstances and proper attestation validate the Will under the Indian Succession Act.
Shri Bijay Singh & Anr. v. Union of India
The High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's order rejecting compensation, holding that the claimants failed to prove the deceased was a bona fide passenger who died due to an untoward incident on the train.
Mohini Devi & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation, holding that the claimants failed to prove the deceased was a bonafide passenger involved in a railway accident.
Anoop Sharma v. Bhushan Kumar Narula & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the nullification of society elections, holding that voting rights depend on payment of maintenance charges and that the appeal became infructuous following directions for fresh elections.
Chander Shekhar & Anr v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a passenger traveling with a valid railway ticket who dies due to accidental fall from a moving train is entitled to statutory compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, overruling the Railway Claims Tribunal's denial based on ticket validity and negligence.
Siddharth Jain v. Nitin Jain
The Delhi High Court held that the father of the parties is not a necessary party to a recovery suit between brothers and refused to allow his impleadment under Order I Rule 10 CPC.
Ram Meher LR v. Mukesh
The High Court allowed the petitioner a final opportunity to present oral and written arguments in a long-pending civil suit, emphasizing the right to fair hearing especially when dependent on legal aid.
Radhika Julka v. Gaurav Julka
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a divorce petitioner's application for an admission-decree, holding that vague denials do not amount to constructive admission in matrimonial cruelty cases.
B M Tiwari v. Ramdin Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed belated filing of written statement and affidavit within the 120-day limit in a commercial suit, imposed costs for delay, and directed fresh hearing of amendment application.
Indravati and Ors. v. Mukesh and Ors.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to implead the deceased plaintiff's daughter in a suit for cancellation of deed, holding that she was neither a necessary nor proper party and could seek separate relief.
Peter A Fernandes v. O P Manchanda & Anr.
The High Court held that applications under Order VII Rule 10/11 CPC at the stage of final arguments are generally unnecessary and that personal appearance directions must be reasoned, disposing of the petition as not pressed.
Som Dutt Sharma v. Munni Lal
The Delhi High Court allowed tenants a final opportunity to complete cross-examination of their witness despite a five-year delay, imposing costs to deter further delay.
Manjeet Plastic Industries & Anr v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the technical disqualification of bidders in a government procurement process for failing to meet eligibility criteria, while directing refund of forfeited Bank Guarantee pending lawful proceedings.
Attal Plastics v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging technical disqualification from a government tender, holding that fresh documents post disqualification cannot be entertained and tender eligibility criteria must be strictly followed.
M/S NF INFRATECH SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld the technical and financial evaluation of bids in a government procurement tender, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to the qualification and ranking of successful bidders based on financial, technical, and Make in India compliance criteria.
Sujeet v. State Govt NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a murder and conspiracy case due to lack of prima facie evidence connecting him to the crime, emphasizing the need for verified evidence at the bail stage.
Shashank Singh v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Interim bail on medical grounds was denied as the accused's medical condition was stable and adequate treatment was available in jail despite the seriousness of the charges.
Delhi Development Authority v. M/S Naraindas R Israni
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, upholding the arbitrator's reasonable contract interpretations and factual findings on claims related to delay, damages, and interest.