Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Kartar Singh v. State (NCT) Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a theft case, observing that his identity was not conclusively established and material witnesses had been examined, subject to stringent conditions.
Narender v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim bail on medical grounds to a petitioner suffering from serious spinal injuries, emphasizing the need for specialized treatment outside custody under strict conditions.
Arjun Sarkar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner in an NDPS case, holding that contraband quantities recovered from co-accused can be aggregated under Section 29 to invoke the statutory bail bar under Section 37 for conspiracy involving commercial quantity.
Pradip Barman v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail, holding that quantities of narcotics recovered from co-accused can be combined under conspiracy to attract the bail prohibition for commercial quantity offences under the NDPS Act.
People Educational Society v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging non-release of grant-in-aid by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs for lack of territorial jurisdiction, applying the doctrine of forum conveniens.
Ved Kumari @ Vaijanti Mala v. Bharat Bhushan and Ors.
The High Court held that a suit for partition and rendition of accounts relating to different properties is not barred by a prior settlement concerning other properties and set aside the dismissal of the suit without notice.
Sandeep Kumar Srivastava and Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that empanelment of advocates as government counsel is discretionary and no legal right exists to claim inclusion, dismissing the petition challenging omission from the empanelled counsel list.
Barun Kumar v. M S Groupe Seb India Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's rejection of leave to defend in a cheque bounce recovery suit, emphasizing that leave to defend is the rule and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of the defendant's jurisdictional and other objections.
M/S VVA DEVELOPERS PVT LTD v. VINOD TYAGI
Filing vakalatnamas by advocates for adverse parties does not constitute wilful disobedience of court process or civil contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
MBL Infrastructure Limited v. Department of Trade and Taxes Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed continuation of GST adjudication proceedings with opportunity for the petitioner, while leaving the question of validity of extension notifications under Section 168A GST Act open pending Supreme Court decision.
Vaibhav Jindal v. Sales Tax Officer & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed fair adjudication with opportunity to reply and personal hearing in GST show cause proceedings pending Supreme Court's decision on the validity of time-extension notifications under Section 168A CGST Act.
Rupali Jain v. Sales Tax Officer Avato & Ors.
Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand order due to defective notice and remanded for fresh hearing, leaving validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court.
Singla Enterprises v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to denial of opportunity to be heard caused by inaccessible portal notices, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Kiran Goel v. Sales Tax Officer/ Avato & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST adjudication orders due to denial of fair hearing caused by non-notification of Show Cause Notices on the GST portal, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of the impugned notification to the Supreme Court.
Axis Finance Limited v. Hitesh Bipinbhai Patel
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into merits or frivolity of claims.
Climax Enterprises Private Limited v. Super Aays Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that orders of the NCLT under the IBC are appealable exclusively before the NCLAT, and High Courts should not entertain writ petitions challenging such orders, especially when the petitioner fails to appear and claim violation of natural justice.
Major Anish Muralidhar v. Sub Mahendra Lal Shrivastava
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing retrospective and most beneficial pay fixation for army personnel promoted between 2006 and 2008, emphasizing the duty of pay authorities to ensure equitable pay irrespective of delayed or non-exercise of option.
Landcraft Developers Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central
The Delhi High Court held that assessment proceedings under Section 153C are barred by limitation if not completed within twelve months from the end of the financial year in which the AO receives seized documents relating to the assessee under Section 153B.
Landcraft Developers Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 27 Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that assessment proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act are barred by limitation if not completed within twelve months from the end of the financial year in which seized documents are handed over to the Assessing Officer.
Puja Agarwal v. Pravesh Narula
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing amendment of the plaint to include trademark infringement claims during the pendency of a copyright infringement suit, emphasizing liberal amendment rules to avoid multiplicity of litigation.