Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shantanu Bhopale v. The Union of India
The Bombay High Court dismissed the IIT aspirant's petitions challenging his JEE (Mains) score and debarment for unfair means, upholding the NTA's evaluation and denying relief.
Neelam Rajendra Nanaware v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of the appellant's discharge application under section 227 CrPC in a financial fraud case, holding that a prima facie case exists against her as Additional Director for misappropriation of investors' deposits under the MPID Act and IPC.
Pawan Khendelwal v. Shankar Mallick
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against dismissal of a complaint under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the complainant failed to prove outstanding liability corresponding to the cheque amount and the respondent successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 NI Act.
Rajeev Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 379 and 411 IPC based on a genuine amicable settlement between the parties, applying Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Supreme Court precedent.
Jai Shukla v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on a genuine settlement and mutual divorce, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process through Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Vishal Malik & Anr. v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR based on an amicable settlement between parties, reaffirming the court's power to prevent abuse of process and promote harmony.
Anil v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a theft-related case under IPC Sections 457, 380, and 511, emphasizing early trial stage and imposing strict bail conditions.
Naya Samaj Parents Association v. Apeejay School Sheikh Sarai
The Delhi High Court held that unaided private schools need not obtain prior DoE approval before increasing fees and dismissed parents' interim plea restraining the school from striking off students for non-payment of lawfully demanded fees.
Harsha Associates Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of Harsha Associates, upholding ITAT's addition of unsubstantiated bank liabilities to income, affirming that unsupported book liabilities can be treated as bogus credits under the Income Tax Act.
Ajay Kumar v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking CBI/SIT probe into police misconduct allegations arising from matrimonial disputes, holding that police inquiries were adequate and complaints baseless.
IDEMIA IDENTITY AND SECURITY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE - 25 DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that reopening an income tax assessment is barred by limitation if the escaped income for the relevant year is below ₹50 lakhs and recurring payments cannot be aggregated as a singular event under Section 149(1A).
IDEMIA IDENTITY AND SECURITY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE - 25 DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment beyond limitation is impermissible by aggregating escaped income over multiple years unless it relates to a single event, and set aside the notice issued to Idemia Identity and Security India Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2019-20.
Shri Manoj Sabharwal v. Shri Azad Ali
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s delayed writ challenging an order directing payment of unpaid wages under the Delhi Shops & Establishments Act, holding that failure to contest evidence and unexplained delay warranted dismissal.
Harshvardhan Metals Ltd & Anr. v. ISF Commodities (P) Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that MCX bye-laws cannot mandate deposit of the awarded amount before filing a statutory challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
East West Products Limited v. Vijani Exim EVT Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discretion in dismissing a summary judgment application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC due to absence of clear and unequivocal admission, requiring a full trial to resolve disputed claims.
CEPCO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. TEWARI RESTAURANT PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court lifted the corporate veil to hold directors personally liable for admitted rent arrears, converted an ordinary suit into a commercial suit, and passed decree for Rs. 2.47 Crores with interest against the defendants.
Shruti Manav Sharma & Anr. v. Sunaina Singh
The High Court held that applications pending before the court cannot be dismissed due to death of a party without impleadment of legal representatives and directed the trial court to hear the applications afresh after impleadment.
Capital Impex Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 4(2), Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a notice under Section 148 issued beyond the prescribed limitation period post-search conducted after 01.04.2021 is invalid, setting aside the reopening of assessment for AY 2014-15.
Sanjay Kumar Jain v. Rajan Kumar Jain & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause in a partnership deed survives dissolution and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes relating to the dissolved partnership.
GMTD BSNL Hisar Haryana v. Suresh Kumar Security Agency
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award awarding interest on delayed payments under a security services contract, affirming limited judicial interference under the Arbitration Act.