Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ram Meher LR v. Mukesh
The High Court allowed the petitioner a final opportunity to present oral and written arguments in a long-pending civil suit, emphasizing the right to fair hearing especially when dependent on legal aid.
Radhika Julka v. Gaurav Julka
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a divorce petitioner's application for an admission-decree, holding that vague denials do not amount to constructive admission in matrimonial cruelty cases.
B M Tiwari v. Ramdin Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed belated filing of written statement and affidavit within the 120-day limit in a commercial suit, imposed costs for delay, and directed fresh hearing of amendment application.
Indravati and Ors. v. Mukesh and Ors.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to implead the deceased plaintiff's daughter in a suit for cancellation of deed, holding that she was neither a necessary nor proper party and could seek separate relief.
Peter A Fernandes v. O P Manchanda & Anr.
The High Court held that applications under Order VII Rule 10/11 CPC at the stage of final arguments are generally unnecessary and that personal appearance directions must be reasoned, disposing of the petition as not pressed.
Som Dutt Sharma v. Munni Lal
The Delhi High Court allowed tenants a final opportunity to complete cross-examination of their witness despite a five-year delay, imposing costs to deter further delay.
Manjeet Plastic Industries & Anr v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the technical disqualification of bidders in a government procurement process for failing to meet eligibility criteria, while directing refund of forfeited Bank Guarantee pending lawful proceedings.
Attal Plastics v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging technical disqualification from a government tender, holding that fresh documents post disqualification cannot be entertained and tender eligibility criteria must be strictly followed.
M/S NF INFRATECH SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld the technical and financial evaluation of bids in a government procurement tender, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to the qualification and ranking of successful bidders based on financial, technical, and Make in India compliance criteria.
Sujeet v. State Govt NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a murder and conspiracy case due to lack of prima facie evidence connecting him to the crime, emphasizing the need for verified evidence at the bail stage.
Shashank Singh v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Interim bail on medical grounds was denied as the accused's medical condition was stable and adequate treatment was available in jail despite the seriousness of the charges.
Delhi Development Authority v. M/S Naraindas R Israni
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, upholding the arbitrator's reasonable contract interpretations and factual findings on claims related to delay, damages, and interest.
Trodat GmbH & Anr. v. Addprint India Enterprises Pvt Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of permission to manufacture a self-inking stamp design, holding it did not infringe the registered designs of the appellants under the Designs Act, applying the informed user test and limiting appellate interference in interlocutory orders.
Idresh Ali v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the deemed acceptance provision of the CCS Pension Rules does not apply to CRPF personnel, directing the respondents to decide the petitioner’s voluntary retirement application within a fixed time while upholding the transfer order.
Mankind Pharma Limited v. Brinton Pharmaceuticals Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted injunction against the respondent's use of the deceptively similar mark ACNESCAR, holding it infringed the appellant's registered pharmaceutical trademark ACNESTAR.
MOHAMMED ASARUDEEN v. UNION OF INDIA
The Supreme Court held that witness protection under Section 44(2) of UAPA and Section 17(2) of the NIA Act requires individual recorded satisfaction and adherence to natural justice, setting aside blanket protection orders that denied the accused access to witness statements.
Vijay Kumar Padalia v. State of Uttarakhand
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the NGT's procedural dismissal, permitting amendment and fresh filing to ensure justice over technicalities in environmental litigation.
Commissioner of Service Tax-III, Mumbai v. M/s. Vodafone India Limited
The Supreme Court upheld that services provided to foreign clients with payment in convertible foreign exchange qualify as export of services exempt from service tax under the Export of Service Rules, 2005, dismissing Revenue's appeals.
DISTRICT APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY v. KAUSHIK BABULAL SHAH
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order directing the release of a sealed sonography machine after acquittal, holding that indefinite sealing is unjustified under the PC & PNDT Act and CrPC.
Tahir V. Isani v. Madan Waman Chodankar
The Supreme Court held that a purchaser from a third party not involved in the suit is not a transferee pendente lite under Order XXI Rule 102 CPC and can raise objections in execution proceedings.