Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Tanishka Steel v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax
Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders passed without proper notice and hearing due to procedural lapses, pending Supreme Court's decision on validity of extension notifications under Section 168A CGST Act.
M/S. JINENDER PAPER MART v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASSII/AVATO WARD 12, ZONE-2, DELHI AND ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte GST adjudication order due to denial of hearing caused by suspension of GST registration and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Fair Deal Cars Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner CGST, Delhi East Commissionerate & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to provide mandatory pre-consultation notice and personal hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.
M/S Reliant Facility Management Private Limited v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for denial of personal hearing and directed fresh proceedings, leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.
M/S SHIVANGI POLY PRODUCT v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Delhi High Court dismissed writ petition challenging GST show cause notice and order but granted time to file appeal, pending Supreme Court’s decision on validity of limitation extension notifications under GST Act.
M/S Garg India Plastics v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for denial of hearing and portal access, granting the petitioner opportunity to reply and be heard, while leaving the validity of the impugned notification to the Supreme Court.
M/S Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a rectification application against a GST demand order while leaving the validity of the impugned notification extending adjudication timelines open pending Supreme Court decision.
Shree Krishna Steel Traders v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court permits appeal against GST adjudication order while leaving the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A CGST Act to be decided by the Supreme Court.
Shivam Iron Store v. Union of India
Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST show cause notice and order, granted time to file appeal, and left validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court's decision.
Laxmi Plastic Products v. Commissioner of DGST & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the appellate authority to adjudicate the petitioner's appeal on merits without dismissal on limitation grounds, while leaving the validity of GST extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
DJ Associates v. Commissioner of DGST & Ors.
Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford hearing, granting petitioner opportunity to reply pending Supreme Court's decision on validity of related notifications.
Tek Xplore v. The Principal Commissioner State Tax Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with a tax adjudication order pending Supreme Court decisions on the validity of related notifications and statutory provisions, allowing the petitioner to pursue statutory appeals on merits.
M/S SHREE JAIN POLYMERS v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld adjudication orders where the petitioner had opportunity to be heard but allowed appeals to be filed without limitation bar pending Supreme Court’s decision on the validity of GST notifications extending limitation periods.
Union of India & Ors. v. Manish Sharma
The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination due to discrepancies between medical boards' findings and dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging it.
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v. Mr. Gurvinder Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and awarded damages against defendants manufacturing and selling counterfeit Calvin Klein goods, decreeing the suit without trial due to defendants' non-appearance and infringement of registered trademarks and copyrights.
ADM AGRO INDUSTRIES LATUR AND VIZAG PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), DELHI AND ANR
The Delhi High Court held that a reassessment notice under Section 148 issued beyond the extended limitation period, after considering statutory exclusions and Supreme Court directions, is invalid and quashed the impugned notice.
Tata Power Renewable Energy Limited v. DCM Textiles Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and not the merits of the dispute.
TATA CAPITAL LTD v. DINESH VASWANI
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator as per the loan agreement's arbitration clause.
Nirmal Kumar Singh v. The Securities and Exchange Board of India
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges against a Director under the SEBI Act for unauthorized CIS operations, holding that prima facie case exists and quashing at pre-trial stage is unwarranted without unimpeachable evidence.
M/S Mahesh Fabrinox Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a CGST order holding that no violation of natural justice occurred and the petitioner was involved in fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit through fabricated invoices.