Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
K.S. Impex Ltd. v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to improper notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Salak Chand Proprietor of S K Associates v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders passed without proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending Supreme Court decision.
DEV ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER OF DGST
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST show cause notice and order, allowed filing of appeal beyond limitation due to pending Supreme Court adjudication on validity of extension notifications under Section 168A of the CGST Act.
M/S Divine Creations v. AVATO, Ward 07, Delhi State Goods and Services Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to denial of proper notice on the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of the extension notification pending before the Supreme Court.
Abdul Gaffar Prop. M/s Farhad Traders v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order passed without personal hearing, directing fresh consideration of the petitioner's reply, while leaving the validity of the impugned notification to the Supreme Court's pending decision.
N B Enterprises v. The Principal Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST adjudication orders due to procedural lapses in notice communication, remanding the matter for fresh hearing while leaving the validity of the impugned notification open pending Supreme Court decision.
Rahul Singhal Proprietor Shivalik Enterprises v. The Commissioner, Central Tax, (Delhi West) Engg. India Ltd. & Ors.
Delhi High Court set aside order denying Input Tax Credit and directed fresh adjudication with personal hearing, leaving validity of GST notifications pending Supreme Court decision.
VR Surat Private Limited v. Amit Sinha
The Delhi High Court held that the seat of arbitration at New Delhi confers jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, limiting judicial scrutiny to prima facie existence of the arbitration agreement.
Tata Capital Limited v. Sumo Life Care Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving merits and frivolity of claims to the arbitral tribunal.
Sanofi India Limited v. Union of India
Delhi High Court quashed criminal complaint against Sanofi India Limited and its Managing Director for filing beyond limitation, rejecting other grounds including right to retesting and vicarious liability.
M/S CLOUD ENTERPRISES v. CDS INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes under the contract.
Suhavni Devi v. Union of India
The High Court allowed compensation to the appellant for death of her son in an accidental fall from a moving train, holding him a bona fide passenger and the incident an untoward incident under the Railways Act.
Government of NCT Delhi v. Priya Kaim
The Delhi High Court held that courts cannot determine equivalence of educational qualifications or compel employers to relax prescribed eligibility criteria in recruitment, setting aside the Tribunal's order allowing a candidate's appointment.
M/S LANDMARK LABELS AND ACCESSORIES LLP v. M/S WYN APPARELS & ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of an exclusive jurisdiction clause conferring jurisdiction on Haryana courts and dismissed the appeal challenging the return of plaint for lack of jurisdiction.
Ahmad v. Amita Singh
The Delhi High Court held that CrPC, not BNSS, governs pending defamation proceedings initiated before BNSS commencement, dismissing petitions challenging summoning without BNSS notice.
Abdul Gaffar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order due to invalid service of notice on an inaccessible portal tab and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of the impugned notification pending before the Supreme Court.
M/S A.S. Builders v. Union of India & Anr.
Delhi High Court allowed procedural relief to petitioner against GST demand orders while leaving the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A of the GST Act open pending Supreme Court decision.
Abdul Gaffar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications to the Supreme Court.
M/S PRIME INTERGLOBE PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST adjudication orders due to ineffective notice via a less visible portal tab, remanding the matter for fresh hearing while leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.
Cristoo Arora v. Union of India and Anr
Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand order for lack of opportunity to reply, granting petitioner time to file reply and appear for hearing, while leaving validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court.