Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S VVA DEVELOPERS PVT LTD v. VINOD TYAGI
Filing vakalatnamas by advocates for adverse parties does not constitute wilful disobedience of court process or civil contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
MBL Infrastructure Limited v. Department of Trade and Taxes Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed continuation of GST adjudication proceedings with opportunity for the petitioner, while leaving the question of validity of extension notifications under Section 168A GST Act open pending Supreme Court decision.
Vaibhav Jindal v. Sales Tax Officer & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed fair adjudication with opportunity to reply and personal hearing in GST show cause proceedings pending Supreme Court's decision on the validity of time-extension notifications under Section 168A CGST Act.
Rupali Jain v. Sales Tax Officer Avato & Ors.
Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand order due to defective notice and remanded for fresh hearing, leaving validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court.
Singla Enterprises v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to denial of opportunity to be heard caused by inaccessible portal notices, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Kiran Goel v. Sales Tax Officer/ Avato & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST adjudication orders due to denial of fair hearing caused by non-notification of Show Cause Notices on the GST portal, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of the impugned notification to the Supreme Court.
Axis Finance Limited v. Hitesh Bipinbhai Patel
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into merits or frivolity of claims.
Climax Enterprises Private Limited v. Super Aays Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that orders of the NCLT under the IBC are appealable exclusively before the NCLAT, and High Courts should not entertain writ petitions challenging such orders, especially when the petitioner fails to appear and claim violation of natural justice.
Major Anish Muralidhar v. Sub Mahendra Lal Shrivastava
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing retrospective and most beneficial pay fixation for army personnel promoted between 2006 and 2008, emphasizing the duty of pay authorities to ensure equitable pay irrespective of delayed or non-exercise of option.
Landcraft Developers Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central
The Delhi High Court held that assessment proceedings under Section 153C are barred by limitation if not completed within twelve months from the end of the financial year in which the AO receives seized documents relating to the assessee under Section 153B.
Landcraft Developers Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 27 Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that assessment proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act are barred by limitation if not completed within twelve months from the end of the financial year in which seized documents are handed over to the Assessing Officer.
Puja Agarwal v. Pravesh Narula
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing amendment of the plaint to include trademark infringement claims during the pendency of a copyright infringement suit, emphasizing liberal amendment rules to avoid multiplicity of litigation.
American Express Banking Corporation (India Branch) v. Assistant Director of Income Tax, Circle 1(1), International Taxation, New Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the ITAT’s remand directing the Transfer Pricing Officer to reconsider intra group services adjustments after proper examination of the assessee’s transfer pricing analysis and satisfaction of statutory conditions under the Income Tax Act.
The Foundry Visionmongers Limited v. Singarajan VFX Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and awarded damages against defendants for unauthorized use of the plaintiff's copyrighted NUKE software, relying on infringement logs and absence of defense.
MS Shanti Swaroop Nikhil Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of GST notifications, leaving the issue open pending the Supreme Court's decision, and emphasized procedural fairness in tax adjudication.
Neelgiri Poly Plast v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax and Others
Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST adjudication order due to defective service of Show Cause Notice and granted opportunity for fresh hearing, leaving validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court.
DHL Express India Private Limited v. Goods and Services Tax Council & Ors.
Delhi High Court set aside ex parte GST adjudication order, granted petitioner opportunity to be heard, and left validity of extension notifications pending Supreme Court decision.
Regent Continental v. Nakul Associates
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal granting conditional leave to defend in a summary suit, emphasizing that denial of leave is an exception and must be based on absence of any triable issue or frivolous defence.
M/S AAYS EXIM v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging GST limitation extension notifications, allowing appeals on merits pending Supreme Court's final verdict on notification validity.
Procter and Gamble Home Products Private Limited v. Goods and Services Tax Council & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte GST adjudication order and directed a fresh hearing, while leaving the validity of contested GST notifications to be decided by the Supreme Court.