Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Thakur Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court quashed the rejection of a joint venture's tender bids due to improper application of tender conditions, holding that authorized signing and apostilled foreign documents suffice for compliance.
Association of Management of Homoeopathic Medical Colleges of Maharashtra v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that private homeopathic colleges were entitled to admit students on vacant seats based on CCH-prescribed eligibility during transitional years 2013-14 and 2014-15, quashing objections to such admissions and directing recognition of students' academic credentials.
Association of Management of Homoeopathic Medical Colleges of Maharashtra v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that private homeopathic colleges could admit students to BHMS courses based on eligibility prescribed by the Central Council for Homeopathy without mandating CET/NEET-UG admission during the transitional years 2013-14 and 2014-15, quashing objections and regularizing admissions of 93 students.
Karan Arora and Ors. v. State of Delhi NCT and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC following a mutual divorce and amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be unjust.
Himanshu Yadav & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 308, 452, and 34 IPC based on a genuine compromise between the parties, affirming the Court's power to end criminal proceedings where continuation would be unfair or an abuse of process.
Mohd Danish v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for regular bail in a case involving serious allegations of sexual assault, blackmail, and digital exploitation supported by forensic evidence, holding that such matters require trial and bail is not warranted at this stage.
Sachin Tomar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 506 and 509 IPC based on a voluntary settlement between the parties, reaffirming the court's power to quash proceedings to promote peace and avoid futile litigation.
Umesh Chand Tyagi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recovery of excess GPF payments made due to employer’s bona fide mistake without employee fault is impermissible after retirement and quashed the recovery, directing refund with interest.
Sonia v. Sita Ram
The High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(b) CPC without a finding of undervaluation and correct valuation, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to the trial court's order.
J M Traders v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to defective service of notice and lack of personal hearing, directing fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
IE Venture Fund I v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi 4 & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that non-claim of carry forward loss in subsequent years does not preclude settlement of a dispute relating to reduction of loss under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
National Research Development Corporation & Anr. v. M/S ARDEE HI-TECH PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator, holding the arbitration notice valid and within limitation, applying Section 14 of the Limitation Act liberally, and directing appointment of an independent arbitrator in line with Supreme Court precedents on impartiality.
Rajender Prasad v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute, leaving merits and limitation issues to arbitration.
JM Traders v. Union of India
Delhi High Court set aside GST adjudication order passed without personal hearing and directed fresh hearing, leaving validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court.
MMR Electricals v. Sales Tax Officer Class II, Ward106, Zone 4, Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a sales tax demand order, holding that the petitioner had opportunity to be heard and must pursue remedy by filing an appeal under the CGST Act.
Charu Overseas Pvt. Ltd. v. Pr. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax
Delhi High Court set aside GST adjudication orders and remanded for fresh hearing, leaving validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
M/S FRESH FEEL APPARELS v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST demand order and directed the petitioner to file an appeal, leaving the validity of the impugned notification pending before the Supreme Court.
M/s Shivam Plastic v. M/s Subhash Manufacturing House
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to set aside an ex parte decree in a commercial suit due to mitigating circumstances of the defendant's father's illness, subject to deposit of decretal amount and undertaking, restoring the matter for trial.
AXIS FINANCE LIMITED v. SHIWENDRA KUMAR YADAV
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between Axis Finance Limited and Shiwendra Kumar Yadav.
Axis Finance Limited v. Ritesh P Akhande
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of the arbitration agreement without delving into merits.