Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sonia v. Sita Ram
The High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(b) CPC without a finding of undervaluation and correct valuation, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to the trial court's order.
J M Traders v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to defective service of notice and lack of personal hearing, directing fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
IE Venture Fund I v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi 4 & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that non-claim of carry forward loss in subsequent years does not preclude settlement of a dispute relating to reduction of loss under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
National Research Development Corporation & Anr. v. M/S ARDEE HI-TECH PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator, holding the arbitration notice valid and within limitation, applying Section 14 of the Limitation Act liberally, and directing appointment of an independent arbitrator in line with Supreme Court precedents on impartiality.
Rajender Prasad v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute, leaving merits and limitation issues to arbitration.
JM Traders v. Union of India
Delhi High Court set aside GST adjudication order passed without personal hearing and directed fresh hearing, leaving validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court.
MMR Electricals v. Sales Tax Officer Class II, Ward106, Zone 4, Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a sales tax demand order, holding that the petitioner had opportunity to be heard and must pursue remedy by filing an appeal under the CGST Act.
Charu Overseas Pvt. Ltd. v. Pr. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax
Delhi High Court set aside GST adjudication orders and remanded for fresh hearing, leaving validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
M/S FRESH FEEL APPARELS v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST demand order and directed the petitioner to file an appeal, leaving the validity of the impugned notification pending before the Supreme Court.
M/s Shivam Plastic v. M/s Subhash Manufacturing House
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to set aside an ex parte decree in a commercial suit due to mitigating circumstances of the defendant's father's illness, subject to deposit of decretal amount and undertaking, restoring the matter for trial.
AXIS FINANCE LIMITED v. SHIWENDRA KUMAR YADAV
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between Axis Finance Limited and Shiwendra Kumar Yadav.
Axis Finance Limited v. Ritesh P Akhande
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of the arbitration agreement without delving into merits.
Upadhyay v. National Council for Teacher Education
Delhi High Court held it has territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2) to entertain writ petition against NCTE's withdrawal of recognition due to substantial cause of action arising within Delhi, remanding matter for merits consideration.
M/S KAVISH ISPAT v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST adjudication orders and notifications extending time limits, directing the petitioner to file an appeal and leaving the validity of the notifications to the Supreme Court's pending decision.
Gurukirpa Enterprises v. Commissioner of DGST & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order for violation of natural justice and allowed the petitioner to file a reply and be heard, while leaving the validity of the impugned GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
M/S RELIANT FACILITY MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD. v. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for lack of personal hearing and directed fresh proceedings, while leaving the validity of extension notifications under judicial consideration by the Supreme Court.
Alaknanda Steel v. Commissioner of DGST & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford a personal hearing, granted the petitioner an opportunity to reply, and left the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A of the GST Act open pending Supreme Court adjudication.
G-TECHNOLOGIES v. COMMISSIONER OF DGST & ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for violation of natural justice and granted the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Sangeeta Goel v. Sales Tax Officer, Class II, Avato, Ward 23- Zone 2, Trade and Tax Department, N.C.T. of Delhi
Delhi High Court set aside GST demand and penalty orders passed without considering petitioner's reply or personal hearing, remanding for fresh adjudication while leaving validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court.
World Art Press v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order due to non-communication of the Show Cause Notice and directed fresh adjudication after personal hearing, while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.