Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M. SEETHARAMA @ SEETHARAMA GOWDA v. THE MANAGER FUTURE GENERAL INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim with Syme’s amputation, fixing income at Rs. 10,000 per month and awarding full medical expenses, increased pain and suffering, and loss of future income with future prospects.
Disha Kapoor v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC in a dowry harassment case due to contradictions and abuse of process.
Vandana v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction for forgery and cheating due to lack of expert evidence, failure to prove mens rea, and defective examination under section 313 CrPC, emphasizing that suspicion cannot replace proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Sunil v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of attempted murder, considering his custody period, conduct, and bail granted to co-accused, subject to stringent conditions.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INS CO LTD v. ROSHAN LAL & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that a driving license for light motor vehicles authorizes driving a three-wheeler, dismissing the insurer’s appeal and affirming liability to indemnify under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Mr. Priamvada; Mr. Ankit Sethi; Mr. Ritish Chauhan v. CS Ajay Antarkar and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition by a non-member challenging the ICSI Disciplinary Committee's exoneration of a member, holding that judicial review is limited to procedural fairness and no appeal lies to non-members under the Company Secretaries Act.
Cadence Design Systems - India - Pvt. Ltd. v. National Faceless Assessment Centre
The Delhi High Court set aside a penalty under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act imposed on deleted additions, holding that penalty cannot survive once the additions are quashed by the ITAT and accepted by the Revenue.
Sandeep Jain v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 82 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside GST demand and rectification orders passed without personal hearing due to inadequate notice, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.
Raghuvir Prasad Jain Proprietor Raghuvir Prasad Jain and Sons v. Commissioner of DGST
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST demand orders based on disputed notifications, directing adjudication of the statutory appeal and leaving the validity of the notifications to the Supreme Court's decision.
Saurav Beverages Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders passed without proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Saurav Beverages Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders passed without proper notice and hearing due to defective service via the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of the impugned notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
M/S CHANDGI RAM AND SONS v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS
Delhi High Court set aside appellate order rejecting GST appeal for delay and restored it for merits hearing, leaving validity of extension notifications pending Supreme Court decision.
Kolbros v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court restored the petitioner’s appeal against a GST demand order and allowed adjudication on merits without limitation bar, pending the Supreme Court’s decision on the validity of the impugned notification extending limitation periods under Section 168A of the GST Act.
M/S. BALAJI ENGINEERING WORKS v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to improper notice via the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of time-extension notifications pending Supreme Court review.
Monu & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the court's power to end criminal proceedings in the interest of justice.
Dinesh Dalal & Anr. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine settlement between estranged spouses, emphasizing the court's power to end criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes upon amicable compromise.
Mayank & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under the BNS, 2023 based on a genuine compromise between parties, applying the principles from Gian Singh v. State of Punjab.
Sarthak Jain & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Kuldeep Mourya and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce decree, emphasizing that continuing criminal proceedings would be futile and against public interest.
Saurav Beverages Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders passed ex-parte due to defective notice via portal, remanding for fresh adjudication with proper hearing, while leaving validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court ruling.